Hang on - a living, breathing, thinking person who is not capable of living outside an institution should be penalised for having to do so?
I don't think he should have sued, because that doesn't help anyone (as he cannot spend the money himself, evidently) but whistle-blowing in this case is justified. But my understanding is that in America, whistles blown = lawsuits.
But hey, if he's so worthess just threaten to kill him.
I'm sure the furore raised by the Right to Live groups will fund him for the rest of his natural life.
__________________
Life's hard you know, so strike a pose on a Cadillac
|