Quote:
Originally Posted by henry quirk
In the sense that there is no absolute or universal morality to consult or rely on.
That is: I have a 'morality' that is idiosyncratic to me, based on my valuing of this or that, but that's just 'me'. I’m not arrogant enough to assume my way is the right way for any one else, or that my way has a root any place other than in 'me'.
#
"...collapse the numerous posts and thoughts..."
I did no such thing...I barely commented on any one's post (except for Dana's and JB's), beyond saying you lot are on target.
|
According to what measure? Whose target? Who made you lord high arbiter of what is or is not factually correct about morality?
All you've put forward is some airy-fairy pseudo-philosphical ramblings about how all morality is essentially a construct in our own minds. Well, whoop de frikken do. Hold the front page. Ain't nobody ever had that thought before. Your understanding of morality is just that. Your understanding. It is not for you to measure how correct the rest of us are.