Quote:
Originally Posted by TheMercenary
No, I would argue that prolonged occupation is not the same as a simple "Right to assemble". At some point, against the letter of the law, the initial assembly becomes a form of protest and is no longer an exercise of the Right to assemble but an act of civil disobedience.
|
It was always a form of protest AND an assembly. What's the point of assembling for redress of grievances if it is not in protest of those grievances?