Thread: Oil Peak
View Single Post
Old 02-11-2004, 08:01 PM   #19
Troubleshooter
The urban Jane Goodall
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Florida
Posts: 3,012
Quote:
Originally posted by Happy Monkey
All of those wrong predictions seemed to share at least one of two features. Either

a) We've found more of the nonrenewable resource, or
b) The rate of increase has gone down recently.

Both of these share one aspect - they put off the danger until later. There isn't an infinite amount of oil, or enough room for infinite people. Efforts in limiting oil use or population growth may be early, but it is not wasted.

In addition, recent improvements in the rates are often due to efforts on our part, such as for endangered species, environmental pollution, and (as mentioned) population growth. If current efforts are abandoned because old predictions did not pan out, then the problems could easily rise back to the rates from the time of the prediction.
I agree. My point was that things have yet to turn out as bad as any of the predictions say they will.

Make no mistake, we need to get our shit together yesterday on non-renewables. Wind, solar, hydrogen IC engines, underwater turbines, bio-diesel, etc. are a necessity, but I've had my fill of the Green Nazis.
__________________
I have gained this from philosophy: that I do without being commanded what others do only from fear of the law. - Aristotle
Troubleshooter is offline   Reply With Quote