Since maggieL is soo busy trying to be patronising she cna't acutally read what i wrote ill repeat.
Quote:
|
often its mutual to both parties
|
Just bceause both benifit doesn't mean its not exploitation.
I tired to DISATTACH morality for it MaggieL, try getting off your goddamn perch miles above where you are so busy preaching from up on high you seem to be incapable of reading what i wrote, and shit stupid shit about my age is jsut the silliest thing i've ever seen, pretty sad too. I run a business, active in multiple political groups, co-cordinating a Youth Forum next year, attend protest rallies by groups such as Greenpeace, and pay my dues to them, and tax, don't treat my like a fucking 5 year old becasue you don't like what i say, and please don't tell me you're still better of that gun control thing. Amazing how everyone here, even Dham however much we disagree can take what i say on the level - except for you, considering your seemsly minority groups background (gay and lesban stuff etc) i would have thought you'd be more open minded.
Doesn't mean you're not expliting, people just don't like the connotations - Griff is a good example, it still stands, this is merely an arguement over langage. SUre i buy my food but i'd argue the guy selling it is making money, more than he needs by selling people food that he bougth for less - how immoral is that?
You provide a service or product people need/want then you are exploiting that desire.