I guess we just see this differently.
I think he makes some very interesting points that apply to both sides.
Perhaps I erred by posting it in this thread.
His "What if's" are pretty appealing to some who are not blinded by party affiliation.
Quote:
He was basically arguing the opposite, I think, of the lunchpail republican ideal - a "smaller",
economically conservative government that DOESN'T fight on behalf of or even defend working-class employment.
|
I disagree. Where do you get that from?
I also think that sometimes hosts, especially on Fox, sometimes (being kind) toe the line
or are basically told what to say. [cough]Koch Brothers[cough]
I get the impression that this is certainly not ^^that.^^
Of course, that's just my opinion. Take it for what you will.