|
V
"I don't remember any demand from Ibby to ignore anything."
He demands to be called 'she'. To do so I have ignore the fact that he is 'he'.
#
Stop asserting I fixate on 'cock'. The mention of 'cock' (as sexual characteristic extending out from genes) is not the crux of my position.
If 'you' need to fixate on 'cock', please do.
#
'He' denotes a state of being, in this case a state of being dictated by a specific chromosome.
You wish to conflate all manner of shifty, cultural, notions about maleness into my position.
Stop it.
In this thread I'm only addressing the foundation for 'he' and she', for real and not-real.
#
"how can you support this statement?"
It's an assumption based on his self-description as 'transgender woman' meaning he, at one time, had male physical characteristics (characteristics extending directly from a specific chromosome pattern) and that he altered or diminished those characteristics (but not the source of those characteristics).
__________________
like the other guy sez: 'not really back, blah-blah-blah...'
|