Quote:
Originally posted by xoxoxoBruce
Wonderbat, the problem is marriage is intrinsic to so many of our laws. It would mean a major revamping of the law library.
|
...or an amendment, maybe? But seriously...
In this day and age, you'd think we could just do a Find and Replace, 'civil union' for 'marriage'. OK, in actual real seriousness, yeah, I do realize it's not really that simple, but it seems like a concept that could at least be worked with. And nobody's still said whether they're philosophically/religiously opposed to it...
And Billy, I'm not sure who you were asking about marrying if we were gay... I guess if I were, and I wanted to marry my partner, then I might have run off to a city where they are marrying gays and done it. I know a few people in real life who did, in San Francisco on Valentine's Day.
Don't the religious right realize they could stop gay sex simply by allowing gay marriage?! OK, with that terrible throwback to 1950s (attempted) humor, I conclude this scattershot post.