Quote:
Originally Posted by xoxoxoBruce
No, what he is saying is, it doesn't matter what the law is if it can't be enforced.
|
But he said,
Quote:
|
What I'm sayin' is, I don’t care what Law says -- enforceable or not ...
|
IOW he does not care what the law says because anarchist beliefs make laws irrelevant. An anarchist principles says personal rights based in personal beliefs supersede laws. That and the resulting contempt for laws is completely irrelevant to this discussion.
Topic is patent law and what patent laws says about intellectual property (ie genes) rights. What happens if genes can be patented? Genes in a crop are protected no matter who breeds more sees from that hybrid seed. Or is it the resulting seed that is patented; not the genes?
If I understand it correctly, should you grow crops from that seed and not sell those crops or resulting seeds, then it is legal?