View Single Post
Old 03-20-2004, 01:48 PM   #44
jaguar
whig
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Posts: 5,075
The vast majority of health infrastructure is public, there are some private hospitals. Telstra is 51% owned by the government and owns the existing copper network, it must provide competitors access to this network to varying degrees in different ways. Optus, now owned by Singtel has a cable network in most major cities that it also provides phone services over. There are 4 major competing mobile networks.

Yes on the electoral power.

But don't, for one second point to the american model of privatization as the answer to these problems. I find your health system morally reprehensible at best and your mess of a utility system a joke. I've firsthand witnessed privatization and attempts there of in various countries over time and seen nothing but increased costs and declining services, often with little or no government saving and on occasion, increased governmental costs. Putting essential infrastructure in the hands of private enterprise neither has any real benefits for the consumer and gives companies little or no motivation to upgrade or improve infrastructure. It's a fundamentally flawed idea with little or no merit.
__________________
Good friends, good books and a sleepy conscience: this is the ideal life.
- Twain

Last edited by jaguar; 03-20-2004 at 01:51 PM.
jaguar is offline   Reply With Quote