Quote:
|
Originally Posted by orthodoc
It's only the frauds and charlatans, like Andrew Wakefield and his ilk,
|
Yeah, I didn't take that bait the first time, and I'm not going to this time either. I understand you have a personal problem with some of my beliefs. That's fine. Fraud is not what I'm looking to discuss here, and you and tw are welcome to continue on without me, if you'd like.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by orthodoc
I have already pointed out that errors in research are identified and corrected with time.
|
This is how I know, by the way, that you've taken this whole thing personally, and aren't actually paying attention to a word I'm saying. I didn't need you to point out the fact that errors are identified and corrected over time--I considered that a given in the OP, and then specifically stated it in my second post, just in case someone happened to get the false idea that I was unaware of how the system of scientific review works. I made an implication about the existence of error correction in my third post, and then clearly stated it
again in my fourth post.
I'm sorry I offended you, ortho. And I'm sorry you hate Wakefield so very much, and by extension me. That's kind of not my problem.