quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Originally posted by ladysycamore
Oh, but he was a member of the armed services: he couldn't possibly be a threat to national security. He was just..."troubled". How about we just single out that Arab or Sikh Indian instead? It's MUCH easier, donchaknow.
Quote:
Originally posted by dhamsaic
NO.
He was <b>REPEATEDLY</b> called a terrorist.
|
Not as much at the time of the crime, but more recently. He certainly wasn't treated like the terroists that are now housed in Cuba.
Quote:
|
You're twisting facts here to add to your argument - that's called "spin", and that's okay.
|
Mmm...no. I was merely making a slight joke with my McVeigh reference, which you did not pick up on...and that's ok too.