[Aliantha]

I don't see why changing the make up of an immunisation is like saying there was something wrong with the first one. There is only progress. All businesses change the make up of their product. Modify, improve etc. If people were to argue that drug companies were selling a faulty product just because they made improvements to it, then pretty much every other business on the planet should be sued too.

It's just not a valid argument, and any lawyer worth half his salt would put that one to bed pretty smartly.

eta: I say that because at this stage, there is no proven scientific link between autism and vaccination (regardless of whether it is a fact or not), so there can be no argument in a court of law about this issue. With regard to the other associated risks, consumers have been warned at every vaccination point about the risks, so that is not arguable either.