Quote:
Originally Posted by classicman
This is somewhat misleading. It depends upon the interpretation of the deal as I posted earlier.
Gee really???
|
Obviously it will be up to interpretations, but in the courts.
The point is that a civil contract can not nullify a law.
If the banks knew about a "gap" they can not "knowlingly" a file false document.
The bank is still responsible (culpable ?) even if the Buyer signed the document,
because the bank is the party creating the contract and knowingly filiing the false document.
Again, it's whether someone's glass is half full or half empty.
I'm quit happy to see such events unfolding... as opposed to what ?