Quote:
Originally Posted by sexobon
In fact 'who' says everything about the credibility of what is presented over the internet.
|
Nonsense. Until the 'who' states underlying reasons why with perspective, he has no credibility. Only relevant are facts that must always have reasons why and with numbers. Otherwise that person has and earns no credibility.
The naive believe only what they were ordered to believe by their political biases. Not by concepts we were all taught even in school science. That is why propaganda and 'fake news' works. That is why so many foolishly think Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity, Bernie Sanders, and Laura Ingle are credible. They forget to learn what is necessary before anyone is credible.
If a statement does not provide perspective in those reasons why, then it is a lie. And the person has no earned credibility. Its always about those facts and numbers - not about a person.
Problem is that most adults do not know (have forgotten) how to do that. Or that it is always necessary. So outright lies from the zero credible are automatically believed.