Quote:
Originally Posted by Happy Monkey
Yes, I got "the point" that you werent talking about the gay, divorced, insurance issue. That's why I said my argument was equally relevant to the birth control issue.
If the First Amendment doesn't block a state from requiring employers to cover birth control, then it doesn't block the Federal Government from requiring employers to cover birth control.
And several states already require non-church employers, including Catholic-run hospitals and universities, to cover birth control, exactly as the proposed Federal rule will do.
|
Again you fail.
It is not about what the states regulate.
It is about what Obama wants to regulate to the states from the Federal pulpit.