Quote:
Originally Posted by Happy Monkey
C is the real answer, but you may have to use A and B because lots of people will see C as socialist and therefore evil.
|
Which is my point. Congressman are all for grandstanding when the real cost is neglibile and the only effect is limited, like the Terri Shaivo case. However, no amount of stories from friends and family will really have an affect unless it happens to be
their friends or family.
Real policy change is made in dollars and cents. In charts on lost productivity, social services expenditures, etc. In making an argument for expenditures, the best argument is savings in cost. It is not a moral argument but a practical one.
And gun violence, while only a tiny percentage of the issue, is the most visible and the most visceral. And the rise in violent incidents might actually be an indicator of a rise in issues overall. Because congressman believe that voters will be more willing to pay for protection than for social good, the argument is easier to make.
Unfortunately, they may be right.
__________________
Exercise your rights and remember your obligations - VOTE!
I have always believed that hope is that stubborn thing inside us that insists, despite all the evidence to the contrary, that something better awaits us so long as we have the courage to keep reaching, to keep working, to keep fighting. --
Barack Hussein Obama