Quote:
Originally Posted by Undertoad
I'll just say this then. Given the facts you know, and the evidence she could not produce, do you believe her case would have survived a real criminal trial?
(Not that it wouldn't open with statute of limitations - which is in place because of specifically these sorts of problems - i.e., cases lose all their potential evidence pro AND con - and human memory is ridiculously flawed over time.)
The anti-Kav side needed her not to go through actual trial conditions, which would have displayed more clearly to the world that there was no criminal case to be made.
The pro-Kav side needed to appear somewhat considerate and not put a potential victim through the kind of grilling a real trial would include.
All this is just part of what made it a perfect storm so that both sides could be seen as angelic from the POV of their constituencies
Both sides got roughly what they wanted although they certainly won't admit that
And so did the public actually - eating this shit up not realizing it's turd sandwiches. We love it, we want it, it's on all channels
|
I don’t think she can prove it without Kav’s friend rolling over. An extended look at him may have shown a pattern of behavior inconsistent with sitting on the SC.
I do blame Feinstein, both sides played a game which ignored the good of the country in favor of party. My perspective is that of someone who found Dr. Ford more credible.