I have a couple of naked bathtub pics of my boys, but I don't have them online anywhere. Just in the family album for all to see.
I think the art which was removed should have been perhaps a private exhibition rather than a public one.
It's pretty much guaranteed the price of the images will be 10 times higher than it was prior to the showing now though. Good or bad? I think I'll reserve my judgement on that. I think if you wanted to artistically show vulnerability, there are probably other ways to do so.
Just because I don't get it doesn't mean it's wrong though I suppose.