“Note that the previous mention of "risk" was about "sharing" it, which is the purpose of insurance.”
Yeah, that’s one interpretation.
#
“To "eliminate" risk would remove the need for insurance.”
Implants, baby.
#
“But the fact that it is impossible to eliminate risk is no reason not to decrease it.”
I’m thinkin’ you have a lower tolerance for risk than me.
##
“This type person justifies assault weapons”
Nope. I advocate for self-direction and -responsibility. You’d rob folks of that just to ‘feel safe’.
#
“enemies of America”
Me? Quite the opposite. I want a ‘free’ America where elected folks are seen as employees, where individuals can take on risk (reaping the benefits or suffering the consequences), and where where the majority understands that the pursuit of ‘safety’ is an exercise in diminishing returns.
You, you’re the enemy, not of America but of the individual. You’d see us all outfitted with one of Young’s fictional implants if you could.
Admit it, you big communitarian.
#
“Too many adults are still children”
Agreed. Such folks will gladly trade off their (and others) real autonomy for the ghost whispers of *‘safety’. Folks like you, tw.
*’course, that not really what it’s about...
