|
The part of your ARGUMENT that is missing in order to make sense ....
Your argument posits that the "lack of people" kept the test numbers low. I contend that the lack of leadership kept (almost) all of the people from being tested because they were being told, "you have, what? fifteen people, and in a couple of days that will be close to zero". That is the lack of leadership I speak of. That is what I'm talking about.
If we'd had more/better leadership, telling us truthful, pertinent, factual information, information he had or should have had (Fucking Burr had it, shared it, acted on it), more people would have been motivated to get tested. But no.
This is what I meant by you/your argument sensed/misidentified. I'm not attacking you.
__________________
Be Just and Fear Not.
|