The Cellar - View Single Post

DanaC · 12-15-2006, 11:45 AM

9-10? Jesus. I was assuming the kids were maybe 13-14 when i read the article. Still wouldn't make it right....but 9-10? They're just babies.

12-15-2006, 11:45 AM	#10
DanaC We have to go back, Kate! Join Date: Apr 2004 Location: Yorkshire Posts: 25,964	9-10? Jesus. I was assuming the kids were maybe 13-14 when i read the article. Still wouldn't make it right....but 9-10? They're just babies.