Quote:
Originally Posted by DanaC
But even that isn't really the point. Surely the point is that Obama never said anything remotely like what he's accused in that cartoon of having said.
|
But is that even the point? I thought the point was that our society is so dumbed-down that a sitting president is regarded as having 'scored points' in a debate because he had better 'zingers' than the opponent. I mean, are we electing a stand-up comedian? Do we need to know if he can juggle, or make balloon animals?
To be fair, I was also insulted by the 'who would you rather have a beer with' analysis of GW Bush, but come on...
Now we're going with
who is snarkier?
Now 'cut downs' are Presidential?