no, no, no. I want to convey that as the entire meaning of the *comics*.
each one introduces a situation where something (sex) might happen then illustrates how the situation itself is not consent. You described them as
Quote:
Originally Posted by traceur
snip--
And yet if you look at the comics from bigV - the feminist "fight against entitlement" which it views as the core of traditionalism - that sense of entitlement comes from the other side of the exact same coin: You have done something good, now Life should fulfill it's promises to you (But she can't because she's too busy going to therapy since your gandparents named her Life).
--snip
|
Each of those comics illustrates a scenario taken straight out of "traditionalism" and points out why it's not consent.
We agree about sex without consent. I'm just not sure we agree on what constitutes consent and what does not constitute consent.