View Single Post
Old 11-22-2015, 04:07 PM   #3
Lamplighter
Person who doesn't update the user title
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Bottom lands of the Missoula floods
Posts: 6,402
More video, or less?
Sheriff calls for policing the police despite 'chilling effect' concerns

StarTribune - Juliet Linderman - 10/29/15
Quote:

By February, Baltimore will equip with a body camera every officer
who comes into regular contact with the public, a program that rolled out Monday
with a pilot effort in which 155 officers will wear body cameras for 54 days.
But only some of the officers taking part in the test volunteered for it;
the rest were selected by their supervisors.

Roberts said every officer has a different view.
"It's objective, and in many cases they will exonerate an officer
against false accusation and that's a big plus," he said.

"Downside is interpretation. Who is interpreting it?
Are they doing so in an emotional manner or an objective manner?
The bottom line is: there's no consensus."...
Such body-camera programs should establish and publicize a longer view.

When an LE officer is doing his/her job properly, there is no downside.
Objective exoneration of the officer should be the ultimate goal.

Otherwise, a jury will become the interpreter.
Lamplighter is offline   Reply With Quote