![]() |
|
|||||||
| Current Events Help understand the world by talking about things happening in it |
| View Poll Results: Do you support saving the US auto companies with tax payer money? | |||
| I support saving any one or all of them. |
|
1 | 3.13% |
| I support assisting them for a limited time with a limited amount. |
|
11 | 34.38% |
| I don't support saving them. |
|
19 | 59.38% |
| I have another plan to save them from certain death (explain below) |
|
1 | 3.13% |
| Voters: 32. You may not vote on this poll | |||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#11 | |
|
changed his status to single
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Right behind you. No, the other side.
Posts: 10,308
|
Quote:
I grew up in a UAW family in a UAW town and I even worked in one of the UAW plants. My father and most of my extended family survive on what the UAW negotiated for them at contract time. Unions paved the way for employee rights we all enjoy today. The UAW is just as guilty as GM, Ford, and Chrylser management if we really look at their current problems. The Unions pushed contracts in the '70's and '80's that they knew were not sustainable - but they sure looked good at the time. That's all fine and there is plenty of blame to pass around but now the day of reckoning is upon us they want government bailouts? BS. No thanks. When JI Case, Case International, etc were circling the drain the company and the union went back to the drawing board. The UAW gave concessions (they gave up some benefits) in the name of keeping the company alive so they could at least keep the sustainable portion of their benefits. There was no government bailout. If the UAW can't figure something out with the big 3 then let them go to bankruptcy. The companies won't close their doors, they'll simply restructure. No government money for them, not a single penny IMO.
__________________
Getting knocked down is no sin, it's not getting back up that's the sin |
|
|
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|