The Cellar  

Go Back   The Cellar > Main > Current Events
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Current Events Help understand the world by talking about things happening in it

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-10-2008, 06:06 PM   #1
deadbeater
Sir Post-A-Lot
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 439
Hey, if you want to start legalizing marijuana and other drugs, the dealers being successfully sued for slipping in some bad weed is a start.
deadbeater is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-10-2008, 08:22 PM   #2
Elspode
When Do I Get Virtual Unreality?
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Raytown, Missouri
Posts: 12,719
Quote:
Originally Posted by deadbeater View Post
Hey, if you want to start legalizing marijuana and other drugs, the dealers being successfully sued for slipping in some bad weed is a start.
Yeah. Make the lawyers see dollar signs, and that shit'll be legal faster than you can say "I'm a tweaker..."
__________________
"To those of you who are wearing ties, I think my dad would appreciate it if you took them off." - Robert Moog
Elspode is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-10-2008, 06:56 PM   #3
Aliantha
trying hard to be a better person
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Posts: 16,493
I don't think they ignored the more serious crimes with regard to Al Capone. The fact is, they couldn't get any 'supportable' evidence even though they knew what was going on.

People kept dying.
__________________
Kind words are the music of the world. F. W. Faber
Aliantha is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-11-2008, 10:32 PM   #4
Clodfobble
UNDER CONDITIONAL MITIGATION
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 20,012
Quote:
Originally Posted by tw
By not naming his provider, the dealer is a 'prime contractor' and therefore fully responsible for integrity (safety) of the product. This dealer sold dangerous product and is 100% guilty for selling a defective product.

That 100% guilt upon the dealer is completely independent of another irresponsible action by the user.
But is it a "defect" when crystal meth gives the user a heart attack, or just a known risk? Gun manufacturers are not responsible when the buyers accidentally shoot themselves, why is this drug dealer automatically responsible for the fact that drugs are inherently dangerous?
Clodfobble is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-11-2008, 10:49 PM   #5
piercehawkeye45
Franklin Pierce
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 3,695
Double Standard?

Guns can be seen as both good and bad while I don't know a single person that can point out a positive effect of crystal meth. There is no other motive to selling crystal meth besides getting money off other people's addictions. While I don't give the dealer 100% of the responsiblity, the dealer deserves a lot. As tw stated, it shouldn't go "the woman gets 40% of the responsibility and the dealer has 60%", both parties are 90-100% responsible for what happened unless there was some sort of sneaky coercion by the dealer.

Also, heart attacks could be a realistic side effect of pure crystal meth.

Quote:
Overdosing can lead to convulsions, respiratory and circulatory collapse, coma and death.
http://menshealth.about.com/cs/stds/...tal_meth_2.htm

I'm assuming heart attack can fall under that.


If it was defective crystal meth, then it is still the dealers fault but it still should be wary that these could be avoided by legalized and regulated drug use.
__________________
I like my perspectives like I like my baseball caps: one size fits all.
piercehawkeye45 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-11-2008, 11:15 PM   #6
Clodfobble
UNDER CONDITIONAL MITIGATION
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 20,012
Quote:
Originally Posted by piercehawkeye45
As tw stated, it shouldn't go "the woman gets 40% of the responsibility and the dealer has 60%", both parties are 90-100% responsible for what happened unless there was some sort of sneaky coercion by the dealer.
Yes, in criminal cases, more than one person can be 100% guilty. But in civil cases, it's not the same. The victim does not "get" anything in the punishment of the criminal, only society does. But assigning a dollar value that is direct restitution for the victim implies that the guilt can be measured. If she's 100% responsible for taking it, then giving her money for taking it doesn't make sense. She's only 100% responsible in a criminal court, where they can both receive appropriate punishment for their individual actions. As it is, he is being punished and she is being rewarded.
Clodfobble is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-11-2008, 11:42 PM   #7
piercehawkeye45
Franklin Pierce
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 3,695
Yes, I agree that is fucked up.
__________________
I like my perspectives like I like my baseball caps: one size fits all.
piercehawkeye45 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-12-2008, 02:58 AM   #8
regular.joe
Старый сержант
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: NC, dreaming of large Russian women.
Posts: 1,464
What clear and utter bullshit. No one, NO ONE, taking a mind altering substance bought on the street is a victim.

It's way too simple. Both parties are 100% responsible for their actions.

The dealer, breaking the law selling illegal drugs. Is responsible for selling illegal drugs.


The woman breaking the law buying the illegal drugs. Is responsible for putting the drugs into her body. Period.

I'm tired of this PC bullshit trying to make a genderless world full of victims with no responsibility for our own actions.
__________________
Birth, wealth, and position are valueless during wartime. Man is only judged by his character --Soldier's Testament.

Death, like birth, is a secret of Nature. - Marcus Aurelius.
regular.joe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-27-2008, 05:41 PM   #9
classicman
barely disguised asshole, keeper of all that is holy.
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 23,401
Apparently she won the suit! Does this open the floodgates for every junkie who isn't happy with his "count" or the quality of the drugs bought?
__________________
"like strapping a pillow on a bull in a china shop" Bullitt
classicman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-27-2008, 07:25 PM   #10
deadbeater
Sir Post-A-Lot
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 439
That will make the dealers make sure that what they sell is pure, not horse manure.
deadbeater is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-27-2008, 10:26 PM   #11
xoxoxoBruce
The future is unwritten
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 71,105
Speaking of horse manure...
__________________
The descent of man ~ Nixon, Friedman, Reagan, Trump.
xoxoxoBruce is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:13 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.