01-14-2012, 05:54 PM | #2912 | ||
erika
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: "the high up north"
Posts: 6,127
|
Quote:
Quote:
I have been convinced both by living in a single-payer country and by the reams of economic and statistical evidence that a free-market system of health care, where your means and your means alone determine your health care, aside from any emotional or moral argument for universal coverage, introduces huge costs to the system when the uninsured require care, huge costs to the public when people get sick, languish, malinger, spread contagion, and otherwise suffer for lack of health care, and huge costs to healthy people as health care providers need more money from patients (thus from insurance companies (who then accordingly raise their rates)), to pay for the ones who aren't insured. On top of the drawbacks to public health and to those WITH insurance or wealth, it is in the best interest of insurance companies to deny coverage in as many cases as possible - since profit is king, finding (legal if not legitimate) reasons not to pay policyholders is an advantage. With a single-payer system, where the government underwrites your insurance policy (which can be supplemented by private policies, but not replaced by, like a public option), we again get a collective risk/responsibility equation - but one where the scale and power of the government, coupled with the fact that the program would need to at best only break even, means that the delivery, to you, of quality, fast, efficient, cheap health care would be the #1 priority of both your insurer AND your doctor. Costs for the uninsured would also fall dramatically - I was not covered under Taiwan's single-payer system, as a foreigner, but for even relatively major things like root canals or ER visits, we would often pay out of pocket and find that it would literally not be worth submitting the claim to our insurance, once deductibles and processing and international mail were dealt with. of course, obamacare isn't single-payer, or even public-option - it's only an individual mandate, the conservative (well, conservative until obama went for it and the right jumped ship) alternative to single-payer. I personally think that an individual mandate is a good thing for public health, but a better thing - too much so - for insurance companies, and leaves itself open to abuse. It might be better than things were, but it's just a teeny baby step, and one that leaves us more at the mercy of corporate health-care. ...and there is nothing else in obamacare to hate. Is there? Because the death panels are a lie. the end of "preexisting condition" denial is almost universally liked - if you have an argument against it please, by all means, out with it, but I can't possibly think of one. I agree with you that it's flawed and doesn't do enough to reign in costs, but is the solution just to dissolve it entirely? If you think it doesn't do enough, wouldn't you support MORE regulation, a STRONGER obamacare?
__________________
not really back, you didn't see me, i was never here shhhhhh |
||
01-14-2012, 06:54 PM | #2913 |
Person who doesn't update the user title
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Bottom lands of the Missoula floods
Posts: 6,402
|
A very good discussion, Ibram.
|
01-15-2012, 06:17 AM | #2914 | ||||
“Hypocrisy: prejudice with a halo”
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Savannah, Georgia
Posts: 21,393
|
Sure there is, plenty.
http://www.cato.org/pubs/wtpapers/BadMedicineWP.pdf Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
Anyone but the this most fuked up President in History in 2012! Last edited by TheMercenary; 01-15-2012 at 06:27 AM. |
||||
01-15-2012, 08:25 AM | #2915 |
Radical Centrist
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Cottage of Prussia
Posts: 31,423
|
Ibs, just to be the devil's advocate:
When you are no longer covered by your parents, and the hardware store doesn't cover you, what will happen? A) You'll be covered under Medicare and while you won't get routine maintenance, the govt plan will pay the expenses if you get hit by a bus B) You'll personally buy the lowest possible level of insurance out of your own pocket; if you don't or can't, you'll pay penalties and fines, and you'll remain uninsured C) You'll be put into a pool of uncovered individuals and your "premiums" will be paid by taxpayers |
01-15-2012, 11:36 AM | #2916 |
erika
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: "the high up north"
Posts: 6,127
|
Well, in VERMONT, the health care exchanges that Vermont was embracing before obamacare and the planned single-payer system already signed into law here put me in a pretty good position health-care wise. It'll be a few years before the exchanges are running but it'll be a few years before my Tricare coverage lapses.
__________________
not really back, you didn't see me, i was never here shhhhhh |
01-15-2012, 11:55 AM | #2917 | |
erika
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: "the high up north"
Posts: 6,127
|
Except that wasn't even what the 'death panels' supposedly were. The bullshit started with the provision that the elderly be given access to end-of-life counselling to help them plan for their future care.
Quote:
Start over with WHAT? what goals would your program have, merc? Honestly, i've seen you railing against both the insurance industry and against obamacare. I assume that to indicate that you think something about the system needs to change. Do you think Obamacare too weak to stop the broken insurance companies and fix our broken health care system, or too strong and heavy-handed to do so? if it's too strong, what provisions go too far? if it's too weak, what would you add to it?
__________________
not really back, you didn't see me, i was never here shhhhhh |
|
01-15-2012, 11:55 AM | #2918 | |
Radical Centrist
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Cottage of Prussia
Posts: 31,423
|
Quote:
|
|
01-15-2012, 12:24 PM | #2919 | |
Person who doesn't update the user title
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Bottom lands of the Missoula floods
Posts: 6,402
|
Quote:
|
|
01-15-2012, 12:30 PM | #2920 | ||
Person who doesn't update the user title
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Bottom lands of the Missoula floods
Posts: 6,402
|
Quote:
Here is a clip from Merc's link to the Cato Institute Up to the age of 26, children can be added to their parents insurance. After 26, they would be considered adults for health insurance purposes. Essentially, a single male would be paying (only) $695 per year, but even that amount would be offset if the person's income were less than 133% of the poverty rate (~$14,000) http://www.cato.org/pubs/wtpapers/BadMedicineWP.pdf Bad Medicine A Guide to the Real Costs and Consequences of the New Health Care Law (Updated and Revised for 2011) Michael D Tanner CATO Institute 2011 Page 3 Quote:
|
||
01-15-2012, 12:35 PM | #2921 |
Radical Centrist
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Cottage of Prussia
Posts: 31,423
|
Yes, it was multiple choice, not essay, and the answer was "B".
|
01-15-2012, 02:45 PM | #2922 |
UNDER CONDITIONAL MITIGATION
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 20,012
|
Unless, of course, it turns out next year that Ibram has lupus. Shitty lottery to win, but you can be sure after that that he will spend virtually anything on a good policy, because it will still be cheaper than his medical costs would be. Good thing he has that option now.
And he will be a walking, talking recommendation to his friends for buying good health coverage, not the cheapest they can get away with. He will say, "Hey, friend with a wife and baby. You see this shitty thing that happened to me out of nowhere? If it happens to you, your wife and baby will be living in a box on the street." And his friend might be smart enough to learn the lesson, and it might change his understanding of what he can and can't afford. |
01-15-2012, 05:17 PM | #2923 |
Doctor Wtf
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Badelaide, Baustralia
Posts: 12,861
|
Remember Ibram used to live in Taiwan.
In Taiwan they have universal health coverage - all in one system so none of this "pre-existing condition" nonsense. It is government run, thus eliminating the drive for profit. Governments are inefficient, right? Not this time. The administration costs have been whittled down to ONE PERCENT of the total bill. For comparison, in the USA, admin is 28% of the helath care budget. That's before we get to the malpractise insurance costs and the highly unlikely tests that docs have to do to cover themsleves.
__________________
Shut up and hug. MoreThanPretty, Nov 5, 2008. Just because I'm nominally polite, does not make me a pussy. Sundae Girl. |
01-15-2012, 10:12 PM | #2924 |
erika
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: "the high up north"
Posts: 6,127
|
Well, yes. A waiver has to be given to Vermont to let it opt out of Obamacare - a wavier the current administration has said they're going to give Vermont based on current information, as the VT healthcare bill would do more than Obamacare would. Obama has said, at least, that he doesn't plan to give waivers to states to implement less rather than more protection for its citizens. I'm all for having waivers to Obamacare for states that think it doesn't do enough - it's waiving it in states that want to do nothing instead that I have a problem with.
__________________
not really back, you didn't see me, i was never here shhhhhh |
01-16-2012, 05:14 AM | #2925 | |
We have to go back, Kate!
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Yorkshire
Posts: 25,964
|
Nicely put Ibica
__________________
Quote:
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 2 (0 members and 2 guests) | |
|
|