The Cellar  

Go Back   The Cellar > Main > Politics

Politics Where we learn not to think less of others who don't share our views

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 06-10-2013, 08:46 AM   #31
Undertoad
Radical Centrist
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Cottage of Prussia
Posts: 31,423
Watching that guy's interview made me cringe a little. And then I read this Slate article which kind of firmed up why:

If the NSA Trusted Edward Snowden With Our Data, Why Should We Trust the NSA?

Quote:
Edward Snowden sounds like a thoughtful, patriotic young man, and I’m sure glad he blew the whistle on the NSA’s surveillance programs. But the more I learned about him this afternoon, the angrier I became. Wait, him? The NSA trusted its most sensitive documents to this guy? And now, after it has just proven itself so inept at handling its own information, the agency still wants us to believe that it can securely hold on to all of our data? Oy vey!

According to the Guardian, Snowden is a 29-year-old high-school dropout who trained for the Army Special Forces before an injury forced him to leave the military. His IT credentials are apparently limited to a few “computer” classes he took at a community college in order to get his high-school equivalency degree—courses that he did not complete. His first job at the NSA was as a security guard. Then, amazingly, he moved up the ranks of the United States’ national security infrastructure: The CIA gave him a job in IT security. He was given diplomatic cover in Geneva. He was hired by Booz Allen Hamilton, the government contractor, which paid him $200,000 a year to work on the NSA’s computer systems.
He believes this has so much seriousness that he is now an enemy of the state, on the lam, hiding out... and giving interviews to major media, where is announces where he is. He's in a country with rule of law and an extradition treaty with the US. Not too bright.

The other curious thing I noticed about PRISM is that it was funded for $20 Million. After a certain amount of zeroes, a number isn't fathomable, but this isn't enough zeroes. The last Powerball winner got many times that in cash. $20M isn't enough to house half a floor in a minor building in DC, and when you overpay them ($200K!! That little fucker!) it doesn't even fill a room. That's six cents for every American, so what are we supposed to be royally freaking out about?
Undertoad is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-10-2013, 11:34 AM   #32
Lamplighter
Person who doesn't update the user title
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Bottom lands of the Missoula floods
Posts: 6,402
It appears that NSA is obtaining phone records from all ISP's,
but I have not seen anything that says they are also getting data
from the land-line companies, such as Century Link.

Obama says the data they are getting is only the same
information that is on your month billing statement.

I think I know why NSA is not getting data from Century Link...
it's because their monthly statements are completely indecipherable.
Lamplighter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-10-2013, 01:36 PM   #33
piercehawkeye45
Franklin Pierce
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 3,695
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lamplighter View Post
I think I know why NSA is not getting data from Century Link...it's because their monthly statements are completely indecipherable.
What are land-lines?
__________________
I like my perspectives like I like my baseball caps: one size fits all.
piercehawkeye45 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-10-2013, 03:28 PM   #34
tw
Read? I only know how to write.
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 11,933
Every few decades we go through this again. The Eagle and the Snowman. A real story that was even summarized in a movie. And how this nation's previous and most advanced spy hardware was compromised.

Apparently not many people are watching PBS Frontline every week (or was it CBS 60 Minutes?). NSA secret buildings are popping up all over the countryside. These revelations should not be shocking. They only confirm what previous reports have been noting.

Again, they even showed a picture of the building, with floors that the elevator does not stop at, in San Franciso. None of these recent revelations should be that shocking.

Metadata means they get data from circuit switched technology companies. And packet addresses from packet switched technology companies. Not the tones in that circuit switched connection. And not data in those packets.

What changed things? It is now possible to store, search, and retrieve those tones or data bits. The law is playing catchup.

Last edited by tw; 06-10-2013 at 03:34 PM.
tw is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-10-2013, 08:16 PM   #35
xoxoxoBruce
The future is unwritten
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 71,105
Quote:
Snowden provided information to the Washington Post and the Guardian, which also posted a video interview with him. In it, he describes himself as appalled by the government he served:

The N.S.A. has built an infrastructure that allows it to intercept almost everything. With this capability, the vast majority of human communications are automatically ingested without targeting. If I wanted to see your e-mails or your wife’s phone, all I have to do is use intercepts. I can get your e-mails, passwords, phone records, credit cards.

I don’t want to live in a society that does these sort of things… I do not want to live in a world where everything I do and say is recorded. That is not something I am willing to support or live under.


What, one wonders, did Snowden think the N.S.A. did? Any marginally attentive citizen, much less N.S.A. employee or contractor, knows that the entire mission of the agency is to intercept electronic communications. Perhaps he thought that the N.S.A. operated only outside the United States; in that case, he hadn’t been paying very close attention. In any event, Snowden decided that he does not “want to live in a society” that intercepts private communications. His latter-day conversion is dubious.
More
__________________
The descent of man ~ Nixon, Friedman, Reagan, Trump.
xoxoxoBruce is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-11-2013, 06:10 AM   #36
DanaC
We have to go back, Kate!
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Yorkshire
Posts: 25,964
There are questions now being asked over here about the way in which our security agencies have used information gained from America's PRISM programme. There are suggestions that we've been using information on UK nationals.

The government is denying any illegality but refusing to give any detail on the 197 requests for information made through the PRISM prgramme.

Awesome quote from Daily Show last night: 'I think you're misunderstanding the perceived problem here, Mr President. No one is saying that you broke any laws. We're just saying it's a little bit weird that you didn't have to'
__________________
Quote:
There's only so much punishment a man can take in pursuit of punani. - Sundae
http://sites.google.com/site/danispoetry/
DanaC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-11-2013, 01:19 PM   #37
Lamplighter
Person who doesn't update the user title
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Bottom lands of the Missoula floods
Posts: 6,402
Shades of Sexabon...

The Hill
Jonathan Easley
1/11/13

Sen. Wyden presses Clapper for ‘straight answers’ on NSA
Quote:
Sen. Ron Wyden (D-Ore.) on Tuesday called for public hearings to investigate
the scope of the National Security Agency’s electronic surveillance of Americans,
questioning if Director of National Intelligence James Clapper
had provided “straight answers” to lawmakers about the programs.

The Oregon senator pointed to Clapper’s testimony during a March 12 hearing,
where Wyden asked if the NSA collects “any type of data at all on millions of Americans.”
Quote:
“No, sir,” Clapper had responded. “There are cases where they could
inadvertently perhaps collect [intelligence on Americans], but not wittingly.”
<snip>
Quote:
“When NSA Director Alexander failed to clarify previous public statements about domestic surveillance,
it was necessary to put the question to the Director of National Intelligence,” he [Wyden] said.

“So that he would be prepared to answer,
I sent the question to Director Clapper’s office a day in advance.
After the hearing was over my staff and I gave his office
a chance to amend his answer,” he continued.
Clapper tried to clarify the remarks while speaking to MSNBC’s Andrea Mitchell on Monday,
arguing that he meant to convey that the NSA doesn’t “voyeuristically pore through U.S. citizens' emails.”
Lamplighter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-11-2013, 01:59 PM   #38
glatt
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 27,717
Was that testimony given to a closed session of either the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence (HPSCI) or the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence (SSCI)? Or was it a public hearing?

I would hope that the NSA wouldn't give out top secret information during public hearings. That would be fairly stupid.

edit: I see that the article explains this. Wyden knew the answer already because he's on the Senate intelligence committee. He just wanted to put Clapper on the record disavowing a program they both knew existed.

Quote:
The exchange put Clapper in a difficult position. Wyden, a senior member of the Senate Intelligence Committee, had been briefed on the NSA program, but publicly led Clapper in a line of questioning that would either require him to disavow knowledge of the program, or to answer truthfully, breaking the law by revealing classified information.
I'm no fan of the NSA data collection, but that's a pretty slimy move.
glatt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-11-2013, 11:47 PM   #39
Lamplighter
Person who doesn't update the user title
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Bottom lands of the Missoula floods
Posts: 6,402
Thumbs up

Slimmy ? I don't think so.

This question was being asked publically for the first time
...atfter PRISM had become public knowledge.

Wyden had previously pursued this in closed sessions, (2012)
and was not being given a straight answer by Clapper.
That is one of the reasons Wyden voted against renewing the Patriot Act.

At least that's the way I've understood these events.
Lamplighter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-12-2013, 05:43 AM   #40
tw
Read? I only know how to write.
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 11,933
All these problems (fears) are directly traceable to what we discussed when the Patriot Act was being enacted and discussed here. Many problems are created by something (if I remember) called article 215. With all the big dic thinking being touted then, well, find the discussion. Honesty and perspective had gone out the door. Then we so gleefully massacred 5000 Americans for no useful purpose in Mission Accomplished.

Never forget the lessons of history. Our younger participant will see it again sometimes after 2040.
tw is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-12-2013, 10:51 PM   #41
sexobon
I love it when a plan comes together.
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 9,793
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lamplighter View Post
Shades of Sexabon...
And I make 'em look GOOD.

I just subscribed to PRISM ONLINE for $49.95 and now have access to everyone's metadata for a year. I'm tickled pink 'cause I never metadata I didn't like.
sexobon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-12-2013, 10:57 PM   #42
orthodoc
Not Suspicious, Merely Canadian
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 3,774
Say again?

Where did you find this PRISM ONLINE for $49.95?
__________________
The greatness of a nation and its moral progress can be judged by the way its animals are treated. - Ghandi
orthodoc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-15-2013, 10:23 AM   #43
Lamplighter
Person who doesn't update the user title
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Bottom lands of the Missoula floods
Posts: 6,402
I found fascinating this article about the way Snowden leaked
the information about PRISM to the Guardian and Washington Post:
(I've deliberately left out some of the details in the article.)

NY Times
NOAM COHEN
June 14, 2013

Player in Leaks Case, Out From Behind Camera
<snip>
Last week, Ms. Poitras, 49, emerged as the pivotal connection between the former
government contractor Edward J. Snowden and writers for The Guardian and The Washington Post
who published his leaked documents about government surveillance.
She also got a byline on two of the papers’ resulting articles.
But she has a much longer history as a filmmaker trying to show on screen
how the world has changed since the Sept. 11 attacks.
<snip>
Mr. Snowden first contacted her in January, she said, telling her that he had read
about her regular border scrutiny and saw it as “an indicator that I was a person who was ‘selected,’*”
that is, someone who would be familiar with what it is to be watched by the government.
“He knew it was a subject that would resonate with me.”
(He had also seen a short film about domestic surveillance,
“The Program,” she made for The New York Times.)

Ms. Poitras, who won a MacArthur “genius” grant last year and
was nominated for an Oscar for “My Country,” was already
living and working outside the country.
After six years of being questioned at the border
— “upwards of 40 times, probably more, I lost count” —
and having her laptop seized, her notes copied, she relocated to Europe.

But in addition to her tense relations with her government, there was another,
more practical reason Mr. Snowden connected with her, she said.
Because of her experience reporting on national security matters, Ms. Poitras said,
she had the technical ability to hold an encrypted online conversation
with Mr. Snowden from the start, which he insisted on.

“The number of journalists who know how to use it is very small,” she said.
“You wouldn’t have been able to communicate with Snowden without encryption.”
<snip>
Lamplighter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-17-2013, 05:59 AM   #44
Griff
still says videotape
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Posts: 26,813
Woz is not feeling the love for post Patriot Act Merica.
http://news.cnet.com/8301-17852_3-57...ca/?tag=reddit
__________________
If you would only recognize that life is hard, things would be so much easier for you.
- Louis D. Brandeis
Griff is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-22-2013, 07:39 AM   #45
ZenGum
Doctor Wtf
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Badelaide, Baustralia
Posts: 12,861
Turns out the British are doing the same metadata collection, on all internet traffic that passes through Britain.

Quote:
The spy agency's programs, appropriately called Mastering the Internet and Global Telecoms Exploitation, tap transatlantic fiber-optic cables that "carry the world's phone calls and internet traffic" by attaching "intercept probes" where the cables meet British soil before "carrying data to western Europe from telephone exchanges and internet servers in North America."

The sheer scale of the program trumps any other that has yet to come to light. As the report notes, the GCHQ "produces larger amounts of metadata than NSA."
http://www.commondreams.org/headline/2013/06/21-7
__________________
Shut up and hug. MoreThanPretty, Nov 5, 2008.
Just because I'm nominally polite, does not make me a pussy. Sundae Girl.
ZenGum is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
securitycouncilmonitored


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:13 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.