The Cellar  

Go Back   The Cellar > Main > Current Events
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Current Events Help understand the world by talking about things happening in it

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 04-22-2013, 09:49 AM   #31
footfootfoot
To shreds, you say?
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: in the house and on the street-how many, many feet we meet!
Posts: 18,449
Agreed. Lamp puts it much more insightfully than my cynical, sarcastic reply.

I need to work on my sincerity.
__________________
The internet is a hateful stew of vomit you can never take completely seriously. - Her Fobs
footfootfoot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-22-2013, 10:06 AM   #32
glatt
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 27,717
Segregation is already happening along race. I'm not sure it's a bad thing though. There was one black kid in my son's Cub Scout den. Only child of a single mom. He was treated well in that den, but always had more problems than many of the other boys staying focused and on task, so he was often singled out for "hey, pay attention" type reminders. He wasn't the only one getting those reminders, but he got them consistently. He seemed to mostly have a good time though.

When it came time to join a Boy Scout troop, he found an all black one on the south side of town. At first I was almost offended, like he thought the troops in his neighborhood weren't good enough for him, but then I figured it was probably really good for him to be getting a whole bunch of positive male role models he could identify with. It would be good for him to see people who looks like him succeeding at all the stuff scouts are supposed to learn.

I think it's very similar to the idea of an all woman's college where a woman can go and learn without being distracted or feeling like they need to compete with the men in the classroom. It's not for everybody, but it can be a good fit for some.
glatt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-22-2013, 12:17 PM   #33
Lamplighter
Person who doesn't update the user title
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Bottom lands of the Missoula floods
Posts: 6,402
But all that was an example of just one specific boy, and not BSA policy.
Yet it is a sad example of my meanings above along the lines of
intentional or unintentional consequences which "...drive them out... "

I'm sorry to disagree, but separate but equal is not.

In the 1980's, BSA received $ from United Way of Multnomah County (OR), and very influential on $ grants.
We, as competing social service non-profit organizations, challenged UWMC
on this funding of BSA with their policy of discrimination towards gays.
BSA threatened to withdraw and take with them their funding resources.
Today, BSA does not receive $ from UWMC and time has shown that fund-raising
has not been negatively affected for remaining social service organizations.

It is not ironic that BSA's "Learning for Life" program
does not have such discriminatory policies. As so often is true, follow the $.

The issues are complex, but BSA will have to reconsider policies
if it wishes to maintain it's exceptional reputation across the US.
Lamplighter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-22-2013, 12:34 PM   #34
xoxoxoBruce
The future is unwritten
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 71,105
Assuming it had an "exceptional reputation across the US". I've often heard Boy Scout as derogatory term.
__________________
The descent of man ~ Nixon, Friedman, Reagan, Trump.
xoxoxoBruce is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-22-2013, 12:39 PM   #35
Lamplighter
Person who doesn't update the user title
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Bottom lands of the Missoula floods
Posts: 6,402
Sorry, I didn't mean it that way at all.
I believe BSA has a well-deserved GOOD reputation.
Lamplighter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-22-2013, 01:01 PM   #36
footfootfoot
To shreds, you say?
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: in the house and on the street-how many, many feet we meet!
Posts: 18,449
Quote:
Originally Posted by xoxoxoBruce View Post
Assuming it had an "exceptional reputation across the US". I've often heard Boy Scout as derogatory term.
I think you've even used it as a derogatory term
__________________
The internet is a hateful stew of vomit you can never take completely seriously. - Her Fobs
footfootfoot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-22-2013, 01:03 PM   #37
glatt
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 27,717
Quote:
Originally Posted by xoxoxoBruce View Post
I've often heard Boy Scout as derogatory term.
Absolutely. Just like "goody two shoes" is a derogatory term. And I think it's something to aspire to, to be called that.
glatt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-22-2013, 01:47 PM   #38
xoxoxoBruce
The future is unwritten
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 71,105
Oh, so now you're casting aspersions on amputees. Well I never...
__________________
The descent of man ~ Nixon, Friedman, Reagan, Trump.
xoxoxoBruce is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-22-2013, 02:05 PM   #39
footfootfoot
To shreds, you say?
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: in the house and on the street-how many, many feet we meet!
Posts: 18,449
Thanks Bruce. All this time I thought Glatt liked me.
__________________
The internet is a hateful stew of vomit you can never take completely seriously. - Her Fobs
footfootfoot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-23-2013, 11:20 AM   #40
BigV
Goon Squad Leader
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Seattle
Posts: 27,063
I got the survey, I indicated that the policy of considering a participant's sexuality in any way was a ridiculous waste of time, adults or children.

I also indicated on the survey that regardless of the outcome of their decision, I'd continue to ignore the sexuality of my fellow scouts--not my fucking business--and carry on with my scouting regardless. I believe this will happen in many places.

It is a STUPID policy, especially given that many of our youngest leaders are themselves recently matriculated/graduated/aged-out scouts. So now it's "ok" to be a gay scout and get your Eagle. Then when the scout turns eighteen, goodbye, BECAUSE HE'S GAY. Whereas a straight scout in the same situation can be recruited as a junior scoutmaster... What bullshit.

I have no idea how such a policy can even be enforced? How is it determined? How is it measured? How? I don't remember any question like that on my application. glatt's right, it is a baby step in the right direction and the ultimate result will be to repeal the policy prohibition against sexual orientation being a factor at all for adult membership.

...

I searched and found this from the BSA Membership Standards Resolution. Sounds like DADT, and we all know how effective and useful and what a positive effect *that* policy had on another highly regimented organization.

Quote:
While the BSA does not proactively inquire about sexual orientation of employees, volunteers, or members, we do not grant membership to individuals who are open or avowed homosexuals or who engage in behavior that would become a distraction to the mission of the BSA.
__________________
Be Just and Fear Not.
BigV is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-23-2013, 11:43 AM   #41
Lamplighter
Person who doesn't update the user title
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Bottom lands of the Missoula floods
Posts: 6,402
From V's link above...

Quote:
...No youth may be denied membership in the Boy Scouts of America
on the basis of sexual orientation or preference alone.
Might this wording remove not 1, but 2 of the 3 G's of the BSA discriminations (gays, girls, and godless)

... another unintended consequence ?

Lamplighter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-23-2013, 12:45 PM   #42
BigV
Goon Squad Leader
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Seattle
Posts: 27,063
nope. still have to be a boy to be a boy scout.

that's not the case for the venturing program, which is co-ed.
__________________
Be Just and Fear Not.
BigV is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-23-2013, 01:10 PM   #43
Lamplighter
Person who doesn't update the user title
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Bottom lands of the Missoula floods
Posts: 6,402
"co-ed"... as are the Learning for Life and Career Awareness Explorling programs.

Again, unfortunately, follow the $
What I am trying to say is that this whole business of homophobia in the BSA
is not an absolute (religious) value, it is being bought for the organization's ($) profit.

As such, it's not worth maintaining in order for BSA to continue providing
the community service and good works that come from scouting.
It is harming the reputation of BSA and sending a wrong message about being gay,
and therein excluding potentially valuable members and leaders unnecessarily.
Lamplighter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-23-2013, 01:15 PM   #44
glatt
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 27,717
Quote:
Originally Posted by BigV View Post
I got the survey
Which one?

I got two. Lots of similar questions between the two, but one asked specifically about forcing a straight scout to sleep in a tent with a gay scout, and the other didn't.
glatt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-23-2013, 02:42 PM   #45
xoxoxoBruce
The future is unwritten
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 71,105
Yeah, but then you get boys wearing dresses.



But seriously, folks, this video by Todd Bieber, Eagle Scout and film maker, is perspective from someone who's been there, done that.

__________________
The descent of man ~ Nixon, Friedman, Reagan, Trump.
xoxoxoBruce is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:47 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.