|
Philosophy Religions, schools of thought, matters of importance and navel-gazing |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
01-09-2008, 01:27 AM | #16 |
trying hard to be a better person
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Posts: 16,493
|
one persons version of morality is almost always different to anothers. There has been a lengthy discussion about that very subject not so long ago in this forum.
__________________
Kind words are the music of the world. F. W. Faber |
01-09-2008, 01:31 AM | #17 |
Only looks like a disaster tourist
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: above 7,000 feet
Posts: 7,208
|
Without a clear definition of "virtuous," anything we say here will have little meaning. Would anyone care to attempt to define what they mean by virtuous? The more I read here, the less I'm sure that you are all talking about the same thing.
|
01-09-2008, 08:10 AM | #18 |
Старый сержант
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: NC, dreaming of large Russian women.
Posts: 1,464
|
It does not matter so much for me what all these philosophers and thinkers have to say on the issue. At one time I did. I wanted to be a philosopher. I found that studying philosophers work, and then calling myself a philosopher, was like studying artists work, and then calling myself an artist. It did not improve my stick figure drawings at all.
It's good to look at their work. At the end of the day, or my life, it's my work that has the most impact on me. Perhaps more importantly on the people around me. Some people are motivated by self, are not virtuous by nature. They may behave in a way that appears virtuous, it is only to reach a selfish end. In my opinion this is not virtue. Just because it appears virtuous to the outside observer. Virtue: 1. conforming to moral and ethical principles; morally excellent; upright: Lead a virtuous life. Moral: 1. of, pertaining to, or concerned with the principles or rules of right conduct or the distinction between right and wrong; ethical: moral attitudes. 2. expressing or conveying truths or counsel as to right conduct, as a speaker or a literary work; moralizing: a moral novel. 3. founded on the fundamental principles of right conduct rather than on legalities, enactment, or custom: moral obligations. 4. capable of conforming to the rules of right conduct: a moral being. 5. conforming to the rules of right conduct (opposed to immoral): a moral man. Ethical: 1. pertaining to or dealing with morals or the principles of morality; pertaining to right and wrong in conduct. Do these work for definitions?
__________________
Birth, wealth, and position are valueless during wartime. Man is only judged by his character --Soldier's Testament. Death, like birth, is a secret of Nature. - Marcus Aurelius. |
01-09-2008, 08:42 AM | #19 |
Only looks like a disaster tourist
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: above 7,000 feet
Posts: 7,208
|
These definitions, when run through the grinder, all come down to right conduct. That's where, for me, the problem lies, because we are all free to choose what we mean by right conduct.
What's virtuous to the fox might not be virtuous to the hen. |
01-09-2008, 11:46 AM | #20 |
Hopeful
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Sammamish, WA
Posts: 232
|
[quote=Aliantha;422731]one persons version of morality is almost always different to anothers. QUOTE]
Agreed. That's what makes us so interesting. But in society todsay, there are many people who, going back to a previous post, are unscrupulous. Those in power and those who are not. And, they get places by walking over those of us who are virtuous. |
01-09-2008, 01:05 PM | #21 |
Franklin Pierce
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 3,695
|
Eh, I said why we favor virtue, not answered why should we be.
We should be virtuous because it is best for society and the greater good. |
01-09-2008, 05:41 PM | #22 |
Looking forward to open mic night.
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: New Mexico
Posts: 5,148
|
For the greater good vs For the good of the whole?
lol!!! The definition of selfishness was changed in the 50's. Doing for one's self didn't used to be at the exclusion of others by definition. It was actually a positive until "spin" came around to say "selfish bad"- "altruism good". Now everyone comes down on selfishness like it's a terrible quality...but in the larger picture it is a good quality to have as a virtue in varying degrees. (Doing for one's self is not always that black and white, and at the exclusion of all others) This is one of the few points that I agree with Ayn Rand. @Regular. G'day. Back to the salt mines for me.
__________________
Show me a sane man, and I will cure him for you.- Carl Jung |
01-09-2008, 06:04 PM | #23 | |
Makes some feel uncomfortable
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 10,346
|
Quote:
__________________
"I'm certainly free, nay compelled, to spread the gospel of Spex. " - xoxoxoBruce |
|
01-10-2008, 11:21 AM | #24 | |
Goon Squad Leader
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Seattle
Posts: 27,063
|
Thank you smoothmoniker for asking such a stimulating question.
Quote:
I don't know the answers to any of these questions. I think the answers will NOT be pat, hard edged, easily quantifiable, whatever they turn out to be. I think that circumstances and context and perspectiv matter a great deal, sometimes even as much as the action itself. I don't know if it's easier, or clearer, but my thoughts on the matter run along this line. Is an action *effective*? Effective at what? Effective at progressing toward or achieving some goal. What goal? Is that goal compatible with my other goals? With the goals of others? Is it important? How important is it relative to the other aspects of my life? All these questions bear on my actions, and how virtuous they are. I'm sorry I've sidestepped entirely your question of why be virtuous with what is virtuous.
__________________
Be Just and Fear Not. |
|
01-10-2008, 02:32 PM | #25 | ||
Kinda New Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 1
|
Quote:
This makes more sense if you understand what Ayn Rand held to be major virtues. It's certainly not things like helping others, sacrificing, being humble, etc. She wrote that: Quote:
http://www.aynrand.org/site/PageServ...ism_essentials |
||
01-22-2008, 12:53 PM | #26 |
Snooty Borg
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 81
|
Each person will almost certainly have a different view of what "virtuous" means, but their opinion will reflect what they view to be desirable behavior. If that person behaves differently than their concience or reason dictates they would likely experience some level of emotional discomfort. Thus, satisfying this desire will prevent as much dissatisfaction as possible and make their impact on the world positive in their eyes.
|
01-22-2008, 01:26 PM | #27 |
We have to go back, Kate!
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Yorkshire
Posts: 25,964
|
*throws a water balloon at Phage and runs away*
|
01-25-2008, 12:18 AM | #28 |
Sir Post-A-Lot
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 439
|
You want to ask why be virtuous? Ok, I ask why not be the ultimate jerk? Let's lift up every skirt and fondle under the shirt of women that passes us by. Let's walk right in front of cars that have the green light (could be fatal on some streets). Let's go into a grocery store and house some snacks, paying optional. Oh, yeah! Let's go out just to drink. It seems to work for some.
Last edited by deadbeater; 01-25-2008 at 12:23 AM. |
01-25-2008, 09:08 AM | #29 |
...
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 8,360
|
I've struggled with this thread a bit because I resist the notion that virtue is imposed from outside, from a god, peer pressure, or other societal constructs. Like most things in my life, I give a big FU to other people's notions of how to behave.
When I act virtuously, it's because I want to live with myself and the consequences of my own actions.
__________________
"Guard your honor. Let your reputation fall where it will. And outlive the bastards!" |
01-25-2008, 09:34 AM | #30 |
Your Bartender
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Philly Burbs, PA
Posts: 7,651
|
What about when you don't? No matter how much you resist peer pressure, can you ever completely discard its influences? Aren't those who rebel against society's constructs affected by the existence of those constructs just as much as those who conform to them?
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|