The Cellar  

Go Back   The Cellar > Main > Current Events

Current Events Help understand the world by talking about things happening in it

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-19-2014, 12:37 PM   #31
Big Sarge
Werepandas - lurking in your shadows
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: In the Deep South
Posts: 3,408
Pia Glenn is an actress and not a reporter. Her ex is Salman Rushdie says she is unstable.

A furious Rushdie told us yesterday, “The reason I broke up with Pia Glenn is that I came to feel that she’s an unstable person who carries around a large, radioactive bucket of stress wherever she goes. It was just exhausting to deal with.
“Her recent explosions . . . demonstrate that she is also an accomplished liar.
“It is hard even to list the untruths in her article. We never lived together — she lived at her father’s home in Freeport, LI. We never agreed to have children together. Our relationship lasted five and a half months, so it’s hard to see how I ‘stole a year’ of her life.
“What most distresses me, however, is her statement that I am still ‘obsessed’ with my ex-wife, Padma Lakshmi. When my marriage to Padma ended I was saddened and hurt, that’s true, but that was two and a half years ago, and, like any adult, I have accepted the world as it is.
“As any of my friends can attest, I long ago turned the page and moved on. It’s absurd of Ms. Glenn to say otherwise. I wish Padma nothing but the best, particularly now that she is expecting, and have written to her to congratulate her. End of story.”
To make matters worse, Rushdie said Glenn had besieged him with calls, forcing him to hang up. He said, “She is plainly confused, and desperate for attention. I’m sorry for her and I hope she gets well soon.”
Rushdie added in a statement: “She’s broke, unemployed . . . and obviously decided to sell me out.


Pia is also one of the famous panelists that made fun of Mitt Romney's grandson.

When the photo was put up, things started off light with Perry saying, “Everybody loves a baby picture, and this was one that really, a lot of people had emotions about this baby picture this year. This is the Romney family. And, of course, there on Governor Romney’s knee is his adopted grandson, who is an African-American, adopted African-American child, Kieran Romney.”
From there, the jokes came with panelist Pia Glenn singing, “One of these things is not like the others, one of these things just isn’t the same.” She joked after her song that “that little baby, front and center, would be the one.”
- See more at: http://madamenoire.com/336678/meliss....dg4HFNsz.dpuf


She really seems to lack credibility if you read some of tweets
__________________
Give a man a match, & he'll be warm for 20 seconds. But toss that man a white phosphorus grenade and he'll be warm for the rest of his life.
Big Sarge is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-19-2014, 04:27 PM   #32
DanaC
We have to go back, Kate!
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Yorkshire
Posts: 25,964
Interesting piece in the Guardian:


Quote:

It’s difficult to view citizens as partners when you’re looking at them through a Kevlar helmet and a riot shield – or when you have failed to build a culture of trust and then you add military equipment and tactics to a combustible mix of racial discrimination and little police accountability. This explosive combination makes policing significantly less effective, and dramatically less safe for everybody.

It’s no wonder so many cops – like some of those in Ferguson, Missouri – view their own community as the enemy when they spend their time geared for combat. It’s no wonder why they, in return, are viewed as an occupying force.

I was the city police chief during 1999’s so-called “Battle in Seattle,” the clash between anti-globalization protesters and my police officers. I realize now that the way we looked – and the way we behaved – provoked and exacerbated the violence. My decision to authorize the use of so-called “hard gear” (black uniforms with ballistic helmets and face shields, and the use of chemical agents) in our interactions with nonviolent, nonthreatening World Trade Organization demonstrators heightened tensions and put everyone – cops and citizens – at greater risk. The militarization of the WTO protests did untold damage to our efforts to build a positive, trusting partnership with our community.

Quote:

It may be too late to have prevented violence in Ferguson, but the community and others like it must come together now and make immediate changes to establish a baseline of behavior for law enforcement – to abide by today and to build upon for the future. The situation in Ferguson is no longer just about Michael Brown’s death: it’s about systemic racism and patterns of neglect, about leadership and the ability to influence angry, sometimes criminally motivated, individuals. Beyond the lifted curfews and long after the National Guard’s presence attempts to restore some semblance of peace, real accountability for everyone’s actions – cops and citizens – is imperative.

-snip-


Meanwhile, the police department needs to immediately begin a process of demilitarization and replace the military model with a community policing model. As part of that, they should adopt the “Memphis model” of crisis intervention – requiring every employee to undergo a week of intensive training in defusing and de-escalation techniques conducted by mental health and communications experts. And they need to prohibit Swat operations for anything other than school shootings, armed hostage situations and other immediate crises when negotiations fail and lives are at stake. So should every police department in America.

It’s clear that Ferguson’s police officers, politicians and community leaders haven’t yet really embraced a philosophy of “community policing”, and that they weren’t working in partnership to identify and solve crime, traffic and other community-police problems – not with a police force that is 93% white in a city that is two-thirds black, or with a trove of military garb waiting in the wings. Some in the Ferguson area, like Missouri State Highway Patrol Captain Ron Johnson, understand the basics. But you can’t reverse the effects of years of military-style policing in a few hours of walking among protesters.

Still, law enforcement officers in Ferguson – and in so many other places – need to start somewhere. They need to start here ... or else they’ll just keep failing in all the same ways
http://www.theguardian.com/commentis...ce-punish-cops
__________________
Quote:
There's only so much punishment a man can take in pursuit of punani. - Sundae
http://sites.google.com/site/danispoetry/
DanaC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-19-2014, 05:09 PM   #33
Big Sarge
Werepandas - lurking in your shadows
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: In the Deep South
Posts: 3,408
The community oriented policing has not worked well. NYC is using the broken window system and is having more success. I do agree with all of you that the police are becoming far too militarized and causes long term problems.

A little update on the officer - he suffered an orbital blowout fracture to his eye socket.
__________________
Give a man a match, & he'll be warm for 20 seconds. But toss that man a white phosphorus grenade and he'll be warm for the rest of his life.
Big Sarge is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-19-2014, 06:29 PM   #34
xoxoxoBruce
The future is unwritten
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 71,105
Quote:
Originally Posted by Big Sarge View Post
Pia Glenn is an actress and not a reporter.
So what? It's not breaking news, she wrote about one incident she observed/experienced, and the undercurrent of feelings by people who consider this a never ending story. I accept that you don't get it, and never will.
Quote:
Her ex is Salman Rushdie says she is unstable.
Your opinion of her is based on her ex badmouthing her? OMG
__________________
The descent of man ~ Nixon, Friedman, Reagan, Trump.
xoxoxoBruce is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-19-2014, 07:48 PM   #35
Clodfobble
UNDER CONDITIONAL MITIGATION
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 20,012
Sarge, I think a lot of people would agree that the actual incident is muddy, and maybe the cop was even right. Even if he wasn't, bad shootings happen all the time; it's unfortunate but not stunning. The *problem* is how Ferguson has handled the protests, turning them into riots when they didn't need to be.

I am a huge supporter of the "broken window" philosophy as well.
Clodfobble is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-20-2014, 09:27 AM   #36
Spexxvet
Makes some feel uncomfortable
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 10,346
Quote:
Originally Posted by Clodfobble View Post
The *problem* is how Ferguson has handled the protests, turning them into riots when they didn't need to be.
Considering that alternatives up 'til now haven't worked, what should the response have been? It's just a modern Boston Tea Party.

Here's an interesting piece -

In 2013, British police officers fired their weapons all of three times. No one died.

http://www.pri.org/stories/2014-08-1...ll-last-year-3
__________________
"I'm certainly free, nay compelled, to spread the gospel of Spex. " - xoxoxoBruce
Spexxvet is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-20-2014, 09:38 AM   #37
glatt
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 27,717
What's the "broken window" philosophy?
glatt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-20-2014, 09:57 AM   #38
Big Sarge
Werepandas - lurking in your shadows
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: In the Deep South
Posts: 3,408
Quote:
Originally Posted by Spexxvet View Post
Considering that alternatives up 'til now haven't worked, what should the response have been? It's just a modern Boston Tea Party.

Here's an interesting piece -

In 2013, British police officers fired their weapons all of three times. No one died.

http://www.pri.org/stories/2014-08-1...ll-last-year-3
Looks like the Brits need more target practice.

I took this from wiki rather tediously typing a response from my text books:

The broken windows theory was first introduced by social scientists James Q. Wilson and George L. Kelling, in an article titled "Broken Windows" which appeared in the March 1982 edition of The Atlantic Monthly.[1] The title comes from the following example:

Consider a building with a few broken windows. If the windows are not repaired, the tendency is for vandals to break a few more windows. Eventually, they may even break into the building, and if it's unoccupied, perhaps become squatters or light fires inside.

Or consider a pavement. Some litter accumulates. Soon, more litter accumulates. Eventually, people even start leaving bags of refuse from take-out restaurants there or even break into cars.

Before the introduction of this theory by Wilson and Kelling, Philip Zimbardo, a Stanford psychologist, arranged an experiment testing the broken-window theory in 1969. Zimbardo arranged for an automobile with no license plates and the hood up to be parked idle in a Bronx neighbourhood and a second automobile in the same condition to be set up in Palo Alto, California. The car in the Bronx was attacked within minutes of its abandonment. Zimbardo noted that the first "vandals" to arrive were a family – a father, mother and a young son – who removed the radiator and battery. Within twenty four hours of its abandonment, everything of value had been stripped from the vehicle. After that, the car's windows were smashed in, parts torn, upholstery ripped, and children were using the car as a playground. At the same time, the vehicle sitting idle in Palo Alto, California sat untouched for more than a week. Then Zimbardo himself went up to the vehicle and deliberately smashed it with a sledgehammer. Soon after, people joined in for the destruction. Zimbardo observed that majority of the adult "vandals" in both cases were primarily well dressed, clean-cut and respectable whites. It is believed that in a neighborhood such as the Bronx where the history of abandoned property and theft are more prevalent, vandalism occurs much more quickly as the community generally seems apathetic. Similar events can occur in any civilized community when communal barriers – the sense of mutual regard and obligations of civility – are lowered by actions that suggests apathy.[1][page needed]

The article received a great deal of attention and was very widely cited. A 1996 criminology and urban sociology book, Fixing Broken Windows: Restoring Order and Reducing Crime in Our Communities by George L. Kelling and Catharine Coles, is based on the article but develops the argument in greater detail. It discusses the theory in relation to crime and strategies to contain or eliminate crime from urban neighborhoods.[2]

A successful strategy for preventing vandalism, say the book's authors, is to fix the problems when they are small. Repair the broken windows within a short time, say, a day or a week, and the tendency is that vandals are much less likely to break more windows or do further damage. Clean up the sidewalk every day, and the tendency is for litter not to accumulate (or for the rate of littering to be much less). Problems do not escalate and thus respectable residents do not flee a neighborhood.

Although work done by the police is crucial towards crime prevention, Oscar Newman, in his 1972 book, Defensible Space, explained that the presence of the police authority is just not enough for a safe and crime-free city. People in the community also need to lend a hand towards crime prevention. The theory that Newman proposes is that people will take care of and protect their own spaces they feel they have an investment in, arguing that an area will eventually be safer if the people feel a sense of ownership and responsibility towards the area. The reason why broken windows and acts of vandalism are still prevalent is because communities simply do not seem to care about the damage. Regardless of how many times the windows have been repaired, the society still has to invest some of their time to keep it safe. The negligence of society towards any form of a "broken window" signifies a lack of concern for the community. Newman states this as a clear sign that the society has accepted this disorder, allowing for the unrepaired broken windows to display the vulnerability and lack of defense against the situation.[3] Malcolm Gladwell also relates this theory to the reality of NYC in his book The Tipping Point.[4]

The theory thus makes two major claims: that further petty crime and low-level anti-social behavior will be deterred, and that major crime will be prevented as a result. Criticism of the theory has tended to focus only on the latter claim.
__________________
Give a man a match, & he'll be warm for 20 seconds. But toss that man a white phosphorus grenade and he'll be warm for the rest of his life.
Big Sarge is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-20-2014, 10:05 AM   #39
glatt
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 27,717
I'd heard of that "broken window" theory before, but it has nothing to do with policing. It's about a society keeping the neighborhood in good repair.

Is there some sort of "broken window" theory for policing?
glatt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-20-2014, 10:35 AM   #40
Big Sarge
Werepandas - lurking in your shadows
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: In the Deep South
Posts: 3,408
yes, it means establishing a zero tolerance policy in the belief that by prosecuting people for minor crimes, it will deter them from committing major crimes in the future. it has shown success in many urban areas.

Here's a video prank that shows some people seem predisposed to prejudice

__________________
Give a man a match, & he'll be warm for 20 seconds. But toss that man a white phosphorus grenade and he'll be warm for the rest of his life.
Big Sarge is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-20-2014, 12:18 PM   #41
Big Sarge
Werepandas - lurking in your shadows
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: In the Deep South
Posts: 3,408
guys, i apologize for being so pig headed. some of you know my situation in Federal Court, 5th Circuit. I have to give a deposition in a little more than hour. i have transferred emotions
__________________
Give a man a match, & he'll be warm for 20 seconds. But toss that man a white phosphorus grenade and he'll be warm for the rest of his life.
Big Sarge is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-20-2014, 01:08 PM   #42
BigV
Goon Squad Leader
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Seattle
Posts: 27,063
Do what you gotta do, Sarge. Good luck, see you after.
__________________
Be Just and Fear Not.
BigV is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-20-2014, 01:29 PM   #43
DanaC
We have to go back, Kate!
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Yorkshire
Posts: 25,964
Sarge - no apologies necessary. Even without what you're going through - it is entirely natural for someone with your connections to the police to see this through that lens. You know what it is like to be in a position where the danger may come from anywhere and anyone and you have to react lightening fast.

Good luck with your deposition

Further to that point - I think this is one of the reasons very few British police support the idea of being routinely armed. If it becomes standard practice to carry a weapon - it's a short step for it to become standard practice to draw that weapon on approaching any potential situation - and that tends to lead to people being shot. That and the fact that if the police are routinely armed then it wuoldn;t be too long before the criminals were routinely armed. Right now, some are, but it's nowhere near as ubiquitous as it seems in the US.

Even so - even with only specialist response teams armed we still have fucks ups anc those fuck ups are usually black lads getting shot. Usually this is followed by an attempt to smear the reputation of the dead black boy (right down to operating surveillance on the grieving family and friends) and a closing of ranks - cue years of wrangling before any enquiry gets underway.

The riots a couple of years ago in the UK were sparked by the police shooting a black man who they thought was armed but who wasn't.
__________________
Quote:
There's only so much punishment a man can take in pursuit of punani. - Sundae
http://sites.google.com/site/danispoetry/
DanaC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-20-2014, 01:33 PM   #44
BigV
Goon Squad Leader
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Seattle
Posts: 27,063
I think the broken window policy of policing is stupid doomed to failure.

First of all, it can never actually happen, that there'll be a zero tolerance approach to crimes. There will **always** be crime, large and small, and the hope that by enforcing criminal prosecution of every crime, no matter how small, will prevent crimes in the future is an unprovable fantasy.

Let me ask you, those of you who support such an approach, give me an example of another zero-tolerance policy that has succeeded in the prevention of transgressions? What about zero-tolerance for weapons or drugs in schools? What about abstinence only policies for sexual behavior? Mandatory minimum sentencing in our courts? What about "broken-window-policing" in any location, anywhere? Where has it worked?

It hasn't. Because there *are* crimes/drugs/weapons/sexing/whatever happening, the enforcement will, almost by definition be selective. THAT'S the problem. Which transgressors are selected, and the justification that "we have a zero-tolerance policy against that" gives a official fig leaf for the enforcers, and can be blithely ignored when that is more convenient. It is inevitable, inescapable that the rules will be enforced selectively.

Imagine if it were not; is it even desirable to have everyone who is driving over the speed limit by any amount stopped? How is that even possible? Where will we get enough cops and prosecutors and jailers? How can that be sustained? And who the fuck wants that?

The worst part is that I, and I believe most others in my community, want police officers who are thoughtful, who exercise good judgement, who can and will choose among the range of responses they have to the infinite situations they face in my neighborhood and not just reflexively, mechanically "following orders".
__________________
Be Just and Fear Not.
BigV is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-20-2014, 02:31 PM   #45
BigV
Goon Squad Leader
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Seattle
Posts: 27,063
Quote:
Originally Posted by Clodfobble View Post
Sarge, I think a lot of people would agree that the actual incident is muddy, and maybe the cop was even right. Even if he wasn't, bad shootings happen all the time; it's unfortunate but not stunning. The *problem* is how Ferguson has handled the protests, turning them into riots when they didn't need to be.
--snip
Bullseye. Exactly right.
__________________
Be Just and Fear Not.
BigV is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:24 AM.


Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.