The Cellar  

Go Back   The Cellar > Main > Politics

Politics Where we learn not to think less of others who don't share our views

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-09-2019, 04:28 PM   #31
Urbane Guerrilla
Person who doesn't update the user title
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Southern California
Posts: 6,338
Quote:
Originally Posted by xoxoxoBruce View Post
Poor tw believed his father was the smartest guy in the world so tw swallowed all the madmen bullshit the old man spouted.
That's why he's so delusional, poor boy.
This is the first I've heard of tw having... family. The very first.
__________________
Wanna stop school shootings? End Gun-Free Zones, of course.
Urbane Guerrilla is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-09-2019, 05:39 PM   #32
tw
Read? I only know how to write.
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 11,361
Quote:
Originally Posted by Urbane Guerrilla View Post
His hobby is mouthing off about how all things and all circumstances betray and offend tw.
Replies are always based in facts that expose / challenge emotions in so many conclusions. Cited repeatedly is how easily some only use emotions to know something. Saddam's WMDs are a classic example. Mission Accomplished, that resulted, was also based in lies justified by emotions. And the resulting disaster - ignoring phase four planning - was but another perfect example of the emotional - challenged by facts even defined by SzeTzu over 2500 years ago.

Even The Don was elected only because he lies and insults people. That appeals to the emotional.

We went through same with a book on strategic objectives in military strategy. You only read the first chapter and gave up. It was too complicated. And therefore did not realize, so well defined in that book, why America would have to return and fight that war all over again - resulting in most of the 5000 Americans uselessly killed there.

But that is too long for an emotional person who needs everything explained in a soundbyte - a 140 character post.

So you attack the messenger rather than address the topic. Learning reality from so many paragraphs is too hard. Better is to wait for the Central Committee to say what to believe. And that, sir, has always been why we will constantly disagree. I do not wait to be brainwashed by extremist talk show hosts.

Meanwhile, xoxoxBruce has finally attempted to answer one of the questions.
Quote:
The reason for it is because a CA tech Billionaire had a sister murdered by an ex-boyfriend who was arrested. A week later ...
The billionaire is a founder of Broadcom. If I remember (from so long ago), his name is Nicholos. His objective is to get a Constitutional Amendment at the Federal level by first getting it implemented in many states.

His objectives are admirable. But the laws (amendments) that he is promoting are too vague, too broad, and too easily used to subvert personal rights. At least that is the analysis by some who use reason to make conclusions. These concepts and principles have been too little discussed to justify and sudden legal change.

It is currently promoted using the same 'we don't need to learn' attitude that justified changing Daylight Savings Time.

The proposal has pros and cons. Both would be discussed by moderates. Unfortunately a citation by sexobon demonstrates a one sided opinion. It does not discuss both pros and cons. And is therefore best ignored as if written by an extremist.

What then follows are so many personal attacks that never answer the questions: Who is pushing all this? And why? What really is the objective? What really is the problem that must be solved?

One can only conclude that most have opinions but could not even answer those simple questions. And that was the purpose of those questions. Separate moderates (who learn facts before having opinions) from extremists (who make conclusions from and justify their attacks only using emotion).

Not surprising, so many cheapshots came from the usual suspects - who refused to answer any of those questions. Apparently because they could not.

Curious is why UG did not immediately join in the usual personal attacks. That is expected from people who only want to 'wreck shit'.

Since this is so long, I expect the usual disparaging comments devoid of any honest discussion. And find it curious that neither moderates nor progressives post in these discussions anymore.
tw is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-09-2019, 06:08 PM   #33
henry quirk
solitary reptile
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: too close to you
Posts: 1,937
I did my own research and posted what I did up-thread because of what I found.

I was cryptic, not uninformed.
__________________
cthulhu fhtagn
henry quirk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-09-2019, 06:25 PM   #34
sexobon
^it sings^
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 8,758
Quote:
Originally Posted by tw View Post
… Unfortunately a citation by sexobon demonstrates a one sided opinion. It does not discuss both pros and cons. And is therefore best ignored as if written by an extremist. ...
My citation comes from the ACLU. The PA. ACLU's position on the matter prevailed and the PA. Supreme Court ruled that Marsy’s Law votes won’t be counted.

The citation was also part of a linked article that gave background information for those willing to do their own research.

Sexobon cites winners. Tw cries with losers.
sexobon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-10-2019, 08:57 AM   #35
Griff
still says videotape
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Posts: 24,749
Quote:
Originally Posted by Griff View Post
So this is going to be on your ballot:

Shall the Pennsylvania Constitution be amended to grant certain rights to crime victims, including to be treated with fairness, respect and dignity; considering their safety in bail proceedings; timely notice and opportunity to take part in public proceedings; reasonable protection from the accused; right to refuse discovery requests made by the accused; restitution and return of property; proceedings free from delay; and to be informed of these rights, so they can enforce them?

This seems pretty broad to be messing with our PA Constitution.

We are having a national discussion about this stuff, see Brett Cavanaugh. I prefer we be more incremental, a fine adjustment versus a hammer blow.

Any thoughts?
So, we're all opposed glad we're so agreeable.
__________________
If you would only recognize that life is hard, things would be so much easier for you.
- Louis D. Brandeis
Griff is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-10-2019, 09:17 AM   #36
sexobon
^it sings^
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 8,758
Noted is that tw was the last to get on board and then only after a decision had been handed down. Everyone else called it right prior.
sexobon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-11-2019, 11:39 AM   #37
Luce
Weaponized Funk
 
Join Date: Nov 2019
Location: Arizona
Posts: 60
Quote:
Originally Posted by Griff View Post
right to refuse discovery requests made by the accused;

Wait. What?
Luce is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 11-11-2019, 05:21 PM   #38
Griff
still says videotape
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Posts: 24,749
IKR?
__________________
If you would only recognize that life is hard, things would be so much easier for you.
- Louis D. Brandeis
Griff is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-15-2019, 02:19 AM   #39
Urbane Guerrilla
Person who doesn't update the user title
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Southern California
Posts: 6,338
Quote:
Originally Posted by tw View Post
Curious is why UG did not immediately join in the usual personal attacks. That is expected from people who only want to 'wreck shit'.
It is simply accounted for: you do not have an accurate understanding of me, and you never will -- as an exertion of the emotional thinking you have always denied on the one hand yet always evidence on the other. You own the emotional thinking, and it is yours in perpetuity. You desperately want my character to be as low as your own. I'm not sorry to inform you that I have more self-respect than that.

You are completely summed up by your bitternesses and prejudices and idées fixes. None here think of you as anything but a piñata. You demand that the world offend and injure you. Sure enough... compliance happens, happened, will further happen.

You'll die alone. Having voted Democratic one last time.
__________________
Wanna stop school shootings? End Gun-Free Zones, of course.

Last edited by Urbane Guerrilla; 11-15-2019 at 02:24 AM.
Urbane Guerrilla is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-15-2019, 02:27 AM   #40
Urbane Guerrilla
Person who doesn't update the user title
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Southern California
Posts: 6,338
Quote:
Originally Posted by sexobon View Post
Noted is that tw was the last to get on board and then only after a decision had been handed down. Everyone else called it right prior.
Hell, I didn't hear a damn thing about it until I read it here.
__________________
Wanna stop school shootings? End Gun-Free Zones, of course.
Urbane Guerrilla is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-15-2019, 05:21 PM   #41
tw
Read? I only know how to write.
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 11,361
Quote:
Originally Posted by Urbane Guerrilla View Post
Hell, I didn't hear a damn thing about it until I read it here.
This movement started in CA. Did CA not have a Proposition for this amendment? CA is famous for its voter initiated laws.
tw is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:16 AM.


Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2019, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.