The Cellar  

Go Back   The Cellar > Main > Politics

Politics Where we learn not to think less of others who don't share our views

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-09-2002, 04:16 PM   #1
Nic Name
retired
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 1,930
Actual Innocence & Death Penalty

There's been some discussion recently on another thread, about the death penalty and actual innocence.

For those interested in pursuing research, or discussion, I'm happy to share these resources from my own research.

An Open Letter to the President
http://www.federalmoratorium.org/Law...oPresident.htm
Convicted by Juries, Exonerated by Science
http://www.ncjrs.org/txtfiles/dnaevid.txt
Convicted by Juries, Exonerated by Science – Commentaries
http://www.criminallawyers.ca/newsle...6/06CONVIC.HTM
Factors Leading to Wrongful Convictions
http://www.chartoftheday.com/20000726b.htm

DEATH PENALTY

Case Against the Death Penalty
http://ethics.acusd.edu/Bedeau.html
Death Penalty Links
http://www.clarkprosecutor.org/html/links/dplinks.htm
Death Penalty News from Amnesty.org
http://web.amnesty.org/ai.nsf/Index/...UNTRIES\CANADA
Death Penalty Representation Project
http://www.deathpenaltyattorney.com/form.html
Death Row’s Living Alumni
http://www.crimelynx.com/commentarydeathrow1.html
Public Opinion Polls
http://www.deathpenaltyinfo.org/Polls.html
Stop the Execution of the Innocent
http://www.aclu.org/action/dpinnocence107.html

DNA – SCIENCE & THE LAW

About DNA Evidence
http://law.about.com/cs/dnaevidence1/
DNA Evidence Banking
http://canada.justice.gc.ca/en/cons/...e/banking.html
DNA Files .Org
http://www.dnafiles.org/home.html
DNA Forensics Conference – Spring 2000
http://www.healthtech.com/conference/00fdx/
DNA Guide
http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/nij/pubs-sum/BC000657.htm
DNA in the Dock
http://www.unesco.org/courier/2000_04/uk/ethique.htm
DNA Search Warrants
http://www.victimsofviolence.on.ca/dna.htm
DNA Tells All – Doesn’t It?
http://whyfiles.org/014forensic/genetic_foren.html
Establishing a DNA Database
http://www.sgc.gc.ca/epub/pol/e199611/e199611.htm
Forensic DNA Analysis
http://www.parl.gc.ca/information/li...bs/bp443-e.htm
Genomics Newswire
http://www.genomicsnews.com/public/profiling.cfm
How DNA Evidence Works
http://www.howstuffworks.com/dna-evidence.htm
International DNA Database
http://www.bc.edu/bc_org/avp/law/lws...4_2/05_TXT.htm
National Commission on the Future of DNA Evidence
http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/nij/dnamtgtrans6/welcome.html
Picturing DNA
http://www.geneart.org/genome-toc.htm
The DNA Revolution
http://www.crimelibrary.com/forensics/dna/index.htm

INNOCENCE PROJECT WEBSITES

California Innocence Project
http://www.cwsl.edu/icda/i_Innocence.html
Innocence Project – Cardozo
http://www.cardozo.yu.edu/innocence_project/
Innocence Project – Michigan
http://www.sado.org/cdn/cooley.htm
Innocence Project – Osgoode Hall
http://www.yorku.ca/dmartin/Innocence/innocenc.htm
Innocence Project Northwest
http://www.ipnw.org/
North Carolina Center on Actual Innocence
http://ncinnocencecenter.law.duke.edu/
Remington Center Innocence Project
http://www.law.wisc.edu/FJR/innocence/index.htm
U Missouri-KC Innocence Project
http://www.umkc.edu/umkc/catalog/htmlc/law/c656c.html

INTERVIEWS

Angels of Justice – Salon
http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2000/03/17/scheck/
Barry Scheck on Frontline
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontl...ws/scheck.html
Peter Neufeld – A Passion for Justice
http://globetrotter.berkeley.edu/peo...feld-con0.html
Rubin Carter – Penthouse 1975
http://www.geocities.com/SunsetStrip...interview.html
Senate Judiciary Committee Testimony of Barry Scheck
http://www.criminaljustice.org/publi...3?OpenDocument

LATEST NEWS

DNA in the News
http://www.ndaa.org/apri/DNA/index.html
DNA Warrants
http://www.cnn.com/2001/LAW/08/09/dn....ap/index.html
New Book on Truscott Case
http://www.newswire.ca/releases/Octo.../09/c4570.html
Timing Running Out to Close Loopholes
http://www.newswire.ca/releases/Sept.../08/c5893.html
USA Time to Stop Executing Juvenile Offenders
http://web.amnesty.org/ai.nsf/Index/...=COUNTRIES\USA
Victim’s Family Joins Wrongly Convicted Staples In Suit Against Police
http://www.hamilton-justice.com/june5newsconf.htm

NEWS & ARTICLES

69th Person Set Free By Innocence Project
http://www.channel2000.com/news/stor...21-202006.html
A Canadian Tragedy
http://cbc.ca/news/indepth/canadian_tragedy/
A Rally for Justice and Accountability
http://www.lakecityreporter.com/news.../010302n3.html
Actual Innocence – case studies
http://www.wsws.org/articles/2000/se...-s14_prn.shtml
Barry Scheck, DNA Pioneer
http://archive.abcnews.go.com/sections/us/scheck1031/
Death Row Inmates, Lifers to get DNA aid
http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/new..._20000501.html
DNA Databanks giving police powerful weapon: the instant hit
http://anon.razorwire.com/nytimes-le...-database.html
DNA Evidence Is Setting Felons Free
http://www.africana.com/DailyArticle...x_20000605.htm
DNA Testing: The Next Big Crime-busting Breakthrough
http://www.city-journal.org/html/10_1_dna_testing.html
DNA Tests Not Likely After An Execution
http://www.geocities.com/icacpstudent/franksmith.html
Ex-boxer Now Fights For Justice
http://detnews.com/2001/metro/0103/15/c09d-199719.htm
Expanding file of DNA riles Britain
http://www.csmonitor.com/durable/2000/09/07/p1s3.htm
Fear, Loathing and DNA
http://shadow.autono.net/sin001/dna.htm
Inmate Calls on Innocence Project
http://www.lvrj.com/lvrj_home/2001/M.../16021493.html
Innocence Project begins in New England
http://www.s-t.com/daily/08-00/08-19-00/a03sr021.htm
Innocence Project credited with expanding awareness of DNA
http://www.cnn.com/2000/LAW/12/22/in....project.crim/
Making Amends for Jailing the Innocent
http://www.csmonitor.com/durable/199...p1s4-csm.shtml
New DNA tests are seen as key to Virginia Case
http://www.talkleft.com/dnava.html
Prison work fuels professor’s passion for justice
http://umns.umc.org/01/feb/068.htm
Reasonable Doubts: Is the US executing innocent people?
http://www.quixote.org/ej/grip/reaso...ubt/index.html
San Diego first to offer inmates free DNA tests
http://www.cnn.com/2000/LAW/07/27/dna.testing/
Scheck taking a turn for the state
http://63.147.65.175/news/jon16.htm
Texas inmates confession slips through the cracks
http://www.talkleft.com/texfall.html
The Guy Paul Morin Story
http://www.razberry.com/raz/laframbo...in/gpmorin.htm
The Innocence Project seeks to free innocent prisoners
http://www.browndailyherald.com/stories.cfm?S=0&ID=1881
The Ordeal of Guy Paul Morin: Canada copes with systematic injustice
http://www.nacdl.org/CHAMPION/ARTICLES/98aug01.htm
The Wrong Man
http://www.uwyo.edu/pols/online/sche...WrongMan1.html
The Wrong Man .pdf file
http://eyewitnessconsortium.utep.edu/berlow.pdf
Tipping the scale at Wenatchee
http://www.wenworld.com/News/features/innocence.html
U. Missouri KC Plans Fight For Inmates
http://www.studentadvantage.lycos.co...132595,00.html
UH Law Students Confront Convictions
http://www.dallasnews.com/texas_sout...ence_15te.html
Unlocking the cells
http://www.reason.com/0001/fe.rb.unlocking.html
When innocence isn’t good enough
http://www.truthinjustice.org/clarencepageed.htm
Worried police refuse to give DNA samples
http://www.lineone.net/express/00/07...s/n0240-d.html
Wrongfully Convicted – CBC News Online
http://cbc.ca/news/indepth/facts/wrong_convicted.html

ORGANISATIONS

American Civil Liberties Union
http://www.aclu.org/death-penalty/
Association in Defence of the Wrongly Convicted
http://www.aidwyc.org/
Centurion Ministries
http://www.nacdl.org/public.nsf/free...s?opendocument
Citizens for a Moratorium on Federal Executions
http://www.federalmoratorium.org/index.shtml
Citizens United for Alternatives to the Death Penalty
http://www.cuadp.org/
Criminal Lawyers Association of Ontario
http://www.criminallawyers.ca/
National Association of Criminal Defence Lawyers
http://www.nacdl.org/public.nsf/Free...e?OpenDocument
National Institute of Justice
http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/nij/welcome.html
New York State Defenders Association
http://www.nysda.org/Hot_Topics/DNA/dna.html

RECOMMENDED READING

A Mother’s Story – Joyce Milgaard
http://chapters.indigo.ca/item.asp?C...FA0BA4FED52717
Actual Innocence – Scheck, Neufeld, Dwyer
http://chapters.indigo.ca/item.asp?C...C638BBCB311917
DNA in the Courtroom
http://www.genelex.com/paternitytest...rnitybook.html
Hurricane: The Miraculous Journey of Rubin Carter
http://chapters.indigo.ca/item.asp?C...F866DEDCFC3017
In Spite of Innocence – Radelet
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/AS...281567-6927340
Lazarus and the Hurricane
http://chapters.indigo.ca/item.asp?C...F866DEDCFC3017
REDRUM the Innocent – Makin
http://chapters.indigo.ca/item.asp?C...E4EBB9C8943617
The 16th Round: From Number 1 Contender to Number 42472
http://chapters.indigo.ca/item.asp?C...F866DEDCFC3017
When Justice Fails: The David Milgaard Story
http://chapters.indigo.ca/item.asp?C...075D3F085A3817

RELATED WEBSITES

CSIS Seminar to Explore Ramifications of DNA Forensics
http://www.csis.org/press/ma_2001_0502.htm
CUADP.org
http://www.cuadp.org/about.html
Death Penalty Information Center
http://www.deathpenaltyinfo.org/
Dr. Edmund Higgins
http://www.dredmundhiggins.com/
Rutgers.edu
http://law-crime.rutgers.edu/inno-links.html
Truth in Justice
http://www.truthinjustice.org/

SONGS

Hurricane – Bob Dylan
http://www.sing365.com/music/lyric.n...25696900386AA4
Wheat Kings – Tragically Hip, for David Milgaard
http://www.azlyrics.com/lyrics/tragi...heatkings.html

TELEVISION & FILM

Justice Denied: The Hurricane Carter Story
http://www.wsws.org/articles/1999/ju...-j17_prn.shtml
Milgaard
http://www.telefilm.gc.ca/en/prod/tv/tv99/029.htm
The Hurricane
http://www.wsws.org/articles/2000/ja...-j18_prn.shtml

WHO’S WHO

Barry Scheck
http://www.roycecarlton.com/speakers/scheck_bio.html
National Law Journal recognizes Scheck & Neufeld
http://www.nlj.com/power/05.html
Rubin “Hurricane” Carter
http://www.speakers.ca/carter.html



INNOCENCE PROTECTION ACT OF 2001

SECTION-BY-SECTION SUMMARY by NACDL

The Innocence Protection Act of 2001 is a carefully crafted package of criminal justice reforms aimed at reducing the risk that innocent persons may be executed. Most urgently, the bill would afford greater access to DNA testing by convicted offenders; and help States improve the quality of legal representation in capital cases.

Source: http://www.nacdl.org/public.nsf/news...6?opendocument

Last edited by Nic Name; 05-09-2002 at 05:23 PM.
Nic Name is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-09-2002, 04:18 PM   #2
Nic Name
retired
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 1,930
Actual Innocence

Excerpt from ACTUAL INNOCENCE, by Barry Scheck, Peter Neufeld, Jim Dwyer

APPENDIX I

A Short List of Reforms to Protect the Innocent

DNA TESTING

Pass statutes on the state and federal level modeled after legislation in New York and Illinois that allow post conviction DNA testing if it could establish a reasonable probability that inmate was wrongfully convicted. Until these laws are passed, follow the 1999 Justice Department report for Post Conviction DNA Testing Recommendations for Handling Requests. DNA testing should be done within seven to fourteen days of a crime to make sure innocent suspects are not incarcerated and to improve the chances of catching the guilty. Do DNA tests on unsolved crimes, including more than 100,000 untested rape kits.

MISTAKEN EYEWITNESS IDENTIFICATION

Implement the recommendations from the 1999 National Institute of Justice report Eyewitness Evidence: A Guide for Law Enforcement.

These measures all can be implemented by changes in police policies, legislation is not necessary.
* All lineups, photo spreads, and other identification processes should be videotaped.
* An independent, trained identification examiner should run the lineups and photo spreads. The examiner should not know the suspect - avoiding the possibility of hints or reactions that would steer the witness.
* Witnesses should be always instructed prior to viewing that the actual perpetrator may not be in the lineup or photo spread.
* Lineups and photo spreads should use the sequential presentation method rather that the simultaneous presentation method. With the sequential procedure, witnesses must decide on each person before seeing the next one. This prevents relative judgments and makes witnesses "dig deeper" to make the determination, and studies show such sequential presentations are more reliable.
* Show-ups should be used only in rare occasions, such as when the person was detained near the scene of the crime and the witness can be shown the suspect within sixty minutes (or less) of the offense. Beyond this, proper lineups or photo spreads (using fillers) should be conducted.
* The witness should be asked to rate his or her certainty at the time of the identification.
* Police and prosecutors should be trained about the risks of providing corroborating details that may disguise doubts a witness may hold.

FALSE CONFESSIONS

One simple rule: Videotape, or at least audiotape, all interrogations so there is an objective record. Alaska has such legislation, and it has long been the rule in the United Kingdom.

JAILHOUSE SNITCHES AND INFORMANTS

Following the lead of Canada's Guy Paul Morin Commission recommendations, jurisdictions should set up a high-level screening committee of prosecutors to vet the jailhouse snitch/informant's testimony and all the attendant circumstances before permitting it to be used at trial. There are fourteen factors that must be considered, including:
* Can the statement be confirmed by extrinsic evidence, i.e., not by another snitch?
* Does it contain details or leads to the discovery of evidence known only to the perpetrator?
* Does the statement contain details that could reasonably be accessed by the in-custody informer, other that through inculpatory statements by the accused - e.g., press accounts or legal pleadings:
* What is the snitch/informer's general character - e.g., criminal record or other disreputable or dishonest conduct known to the authorities?
* Is the snitch/informer a recidivist snitch/informer? Trial judges should presume that a jailhouse informant's testimony is unreliable and require the prosecutor to overcome that presumption before a jury can hear the evidence. All deals with snitch/informants must be in writing and all communications between the snitch and the police or prosecutor should be videotaped or audiotaped.

FORENSIC FRAUD

Forensic scientists should formally agree, as standard practice, that crime laboratories function as an independent third force within the criminal justice system, unbeholden to prosecutors or defense lawyers, operated by professionals who will not misrepresent or slant data for either side. Crime laboratory budgets should be independent from the police, and police officials should not be able to exercise supervisory responsibility over the scientists. Complete discovery of underlying data from forensic tests should be provided in criminal cases. Reports from forensic tests should be comprehensible explanations of the work performed, not conclusory assertions, and must describe all potentially exculpatory inferences that could be drawn from the results. There should be whistle-blower protection for forensic scientists in government who question the reliability of work, and experienced ombudspersons who can be called in to mediate disputes between scientists. State and local governments should establish an independent inspector general- type lawyer who is authorized to investigate allegations of misconduct in crime laboratories the same way that Michael Bromwich investigated the FBI laboratory. First-rate postgraduate forensic science programs should be established in leading American universities; they are desperately needed, and there are plenty of jobs in the field for highly qualified personnel. Law schools and medical schools should become active sponsors of these programs.

JUNK SCIENCE, SLOPPY SCIENCE

The underlying scientific basis for many forensic tests must be objectively re-evaluated under the standards enunciated in recent Supreme Court decisions designed to keep junk science out of court. Microscopic hair-comparison evidence should be abandoned. Instead, mitochondrial DNA testing of hairs should be conducted in any hair evaluation involving a matter of importance. Like medical labs, all the disciplines in crime labs should be subjected to regulatory oversight and should meet standards of professional organizations. States should create agencies modeled after New York's Forensic Science Review Commission - an independent panel composed of scientists, prosecutors, defense counsel, crime lab directors, police, and judges - that have real authority to provide effective regulation of laboratories. All crime laboratories must be accredited. This is not a panacea but a good first step. Accreditation should involve rigorous quality-control and quality- assurance review, periodic inspection, and spot checking of technicians' data. Laboratories must submit to a rigorous proficiency-testing program, including blind proficiency testing, in which samples would be sent in and analyzed as thought they were part of an ordinary case. Labs should be rated on their ability to come up with valid results. In courts, the scientists should provide, as a matter of course, information about "controls" and whether they failed; and what the error rate is for a procedure. Defense lawyers should have all material scientific evidence independently scrutinized, if not re-tested, by a competent expert. Public defenders and court-appointed lawyers must have funds to retain qualified independent experts. Every public defender's office should have at least one lawyer who acts as a full time forensic science specialist, helping other lawyers on their cases.

BAD PROSECUTORS, BAD COPS

Create specialized, blue ribbon disciplinary committees to deal exclusively with misconduct by criminal defense attorneys and prosecutors. Enhance federal involvement in prosecution of misconduct by state police officers.

BAD DEFENSE LAWYERS

Fees for court-appointed lawyers must be raised to a level that will attract competent lawyers to take cases. Public defender salaries should be the same as prosecutors in each jurisdiction to ensure adequate pay levels. Public defender caseloads should not exceed the generally accepted standards of the National Legal Aid and Defenders Association. Ethical complaints should be filed with the state bar when lawyers are forced to proceed with too many cases. To ensure high-quality defense services for the poor, there must be performance standards enforced in every jurisdiction - standards that apply both to defender organizations and to individual court-appointed counsel. The standards serve three purposes: education a skeptical public about what it takes to provided capable lawyers, promoting an understanding of why greater funding is essential, and providing notice to the lawyers themselves of what is expected. Federal money to assist defense services should be roughly comparable to prosecutorial funding.

COMPENSATION AND VICTIMS

Victim services experts should be assigned to assist victims whose mistaken identification testimony turns out to have convicted an innocent defendant. Each state should pass no-fault compensation statures to provide decent relief to those who can prove they were wrongly convicted by clear and convincing evidence. New York's no-fault stature, which permits recovery for past and future pain and suffering and lost wages, should be the model.

THE DEATH PENALTY

At the very least, follow the American Bar Association recommendations that call for a moratorium on the death penalty and other affirmative reforms, including adequate compensation and resources for death penalty counsel.

INNOCENCE COMMISSIONS

From state and federal institutions modeled after the Criminal Case Review Commission in the United Kingdom to investigate wrongful convictions. Require the official collection and reporting of data on cases where newly discovered evidence of innocence is the basis for overturning a conviction. Create and fund Innocence Projects at law schools that will represent clients in DNA and non-DNA cases. Fund teaching and research on wrongful convictions, causes, and remedies.

AN INNOCENCE NETWORK AT LAW SCHOOLS

Last edited by Nic Name; 05-09-2002 at 05:16 PM.
Nic Name is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-09-2002, 04:19 PM   #3
Nic Name
retired
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 1,930
Barry Scheck has gone on the road to promote The Innocence Project nationally.

At the "National Conference on Wrongful Conviction and the Death Penalty" held in November at Northwestern Law School, Professor Scheck invoked Judge Learned Hand, who in 1923 wrote, "Our procedure has always been haunted by the ghost of the innocent man convicted. It is an unreal dream." He called upon colleagues from law schools around the country to establish an "Innocence Network."

According to Scheck, the conference, which he helped to organize, is the first step in building a network of faculty members who will take on wrongful conviction cases and/or teach courses that explore the causes and remedies for this vexing problem.

"It is our experience that law schools are the last, best hope for those who have viable claims of wrongful conviction. . . These cases are often complex, and they require idealism, energy, and creative lawyering-qualities found in abundance among faculty, students, and administrations at law schools," wrote Scheck in a letter of invitation to law professors throughout the country.

"Moreover," he continued, "when even one wrongful conviction is corrected on the grounds of actual innocence, the impact of that case in the jurisdiction where it occurred, and the lessons it teaches about all aspects of the system, are usually profound for all involved."

According to Scheck, "we have learned through our work that so much more could be accomplished if law schools throughout the country made a concerted and organized effort to focus on the problem of actual innocence from both a scholarly and hands-on perspective."

Source: http://www.cardozo.net/life/fall1998/faculty.briefs/
Nic Name is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-10-2002, 09:23 AM   #4
russotto
Professor
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 1,788
Actual innocence is not sufficient grounds to overturn a conviction. Sad but true.
russotto is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-10-2002, 10:49 AM   #5
BrianR
Cleverly disguised as a responsible adult
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 3,338
Angry I'm getting angry

Just why is it that everybody seems to be worried that death penalty cases were "fairly tried", that the convicted really were guilty, that some shred of doubt might remain that the accused could have been innocent?

Where is this sentiment for all those who are jailed (some for life) who might be innocent? I was jailed and I was innocent. Where was my personal bleeding heart law project searching for DNA samples? Who was there to file motions ad nauseum to delay my trial? Why was there no moratorium on jail sentences to spare me the indignity of strip searches and sleeping with one eye open? And what about my lost wages? And my good name? I'll be forever branded as a felon because my name is now in NCIC and I can't get it removed. Who is going to sue to correct that? Where's my compensation for bills that weren't paid?

I'm really getting sick of people telling me that just because there is no possibility of parole from death is sufficient grounds to revisit the case time and again over decades until a stay is granted by some left-wing extremist governor who "just isn't sure"... as if he were on the jury who had to weigh the evidence and convict the creep and sentence him. The governor's job is to sign the warrant and schedule the execution, not review the case to make sure no stone was missed.

Sure, it's possible that once in a great while an innocent man (or woman) will be tried, convicted and executed wrongly and I deplore that state of affairs. I think that I'd rather see my tax money go to paying for a good attorney for these cases than for, say, the Tennessee Valley Authority or the Rural Electrification Project. But let's face it... more killers are taken off death row for procedural errors than for innocence.

I swear, I need to come up with a whole page of links to information resources that show how an executed killer doesn't kill again, for sure. No more inmates stabbed with a plastic shard, no guards strangled and beaten to death for not allowing illegal conduct to go on. And how the executed criminals really were guilty and how DNA evidence discovered after the fact proved their guilt all the more. And studies showing how much money might be saved by ridding society of people who refuse to live by the rules and endanger the rest of us by their own actions.

And I need to go to the grocery store so I can have breakfast. I hate it when I wake up and find that my milk is now gone and I get leftover Tuna Helper to eat instead of my favorite breakfast cereal.
Also, I got up on the wrong side of the bed this morning.
__________________
Never be afraid to tell the world who you are. -- Anonymous
BrianR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-10-2002, 01:20 PM   #6
Undertoad
Radical Centrist
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Cottage of Prussia
Posts: 31,423
So, because it happened to you and you were innocent and nobody came to your defense -- that means people in similar circumstances, who are going to be killed, should get the same lack of concern?
Undertoad is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-10-2002, 07:15 PM   #7
Nic Name
retired
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 1,930
He's a man of his convictions and he has served time for every one of them.
Nic Name is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-11-2002, 11:57 AM   #8
BrianR
Cleverly disguised as a responsible adult
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 3,338
to clarify

I was not convicted (yet).

But I still have to live with the stigma of arrest and the charges which keep me from owning a gun.
I've tested this, so I know well what the rest of the world thinks of me. Or at least the government.

I was and will always be innocent of the charges and I wonder why they were even brought when the physical evidence shows this clearly. If I ever get around to developing my film I can even post it to here so you can judge for yourselves. I'll even post a pic of Mikie, Junior, known as Junior for short. He's my Pit/Lab mutt and kind of cute even at six months although he WAS cuter at eight weeks.

In the meantime I stand by my opinions on the death penalty.

Brian
__________________
Never be afraid to tell the world who you are. -- Anonymous
BrianR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-11-2002, 12:44 PM   #9
Nic Name
retired
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 1,930
It is possible to be in favor of the death penalty and still support the Innocence Project and the Innocence Protection Act of 2001. Of course, experience with such civil liberties causes may change one's views of the death penaly as it is applied, in fact.

Hopefully, someday there will be legislation and procedures in effect that reduce considerably the number of people, actually innocent, who get actually convicted and even actually executed for something they didn't do.

Few of us have personal experience of the profound sense of injustice of wrongful accusation. Some here do. This sense, no doubt, increases with wrongful conviction, particularly when the sentence is either life in prison, or worse, death. As some know, and even some of us could experience: conviction is not proof of guilt. Everyone wrongly convicted deserves the empathy and help of others who are free and able.

With or without the death penalty, emancipation of the actually innocent but wrongly convicted should be as important an objective of a civilized society as conviction and punishment of the guilty.

When there is irrefutable scientific proof of actual innocence, and the wrongly convicted is scheduled to be irrevocably executed pursuant to death penalty statutes intended for the actually guilty, there is a greater sense of urgency and priority to help with the limited resources available for post-conviction review.
Nic Name is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-13-2002, 03:30 PM   #10
russotto
Professor
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 1,788
Hmm. I've been arrested and have bought guns since.
russotto is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-14-2002, 05:29 PM   #11
Nic Name
retired
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 1,930
Innocence Project Official Website

http://www.innocenceproject.org/index.php
Nic Name is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:45 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.