|
Image of the Day Images that will blow your mind - every day. [Blog] [RSS] [XML] |
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
12-28-2016, 09:31 PM | #1 | ||
The future is unwritten
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 71,105
|
Dec 29th, 2016: I See Stars
Damn, they must have taken some pictures from telescopes, or the Space Station, and photoshopped some mountains on them.
.......NOPE! Quote:
Quote:
With an absence of light pollution the view was amazing, greater than I'd see anywhere else. I suppose I could have seen a lot of stars in the wilds of Alaska but there was too much light pollution from the Aurora Borealis. A lot more pictures at the link
__________________
The descent of man ~ Nixon, Friedman, Reagan, Trump. |
||
12-29-2016, 07:37 AM | #2 |
Banned
Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 660
|
I call minor shenanigans! I've been reading Astronomy Image of the Day for years, plus surfing their entire archive back into the late 1990s when .gif images built dot-by-dot by detail-crazed coders were the big thing in images, which is why I can say I've seen enough sky pics to call shenanigans.
The mountains are real, and the lighting is accurate for late-night long exposure photos. The skies are real...but everything is the wrong size. And color--nebulae only go that kind of vivid pink/red when filters are applied to identify elements (usually hydrogen, sulfur, and oxygen). The one with the dirty orange-ish splotch, that's what most nebulae look like without filtering. Not all, but most. And I'm pretty sure the Andromeda Galaxy is not that visually large from anywhere on Earth. Maybe someone who's not half dead from some viral crapola in the wake of too many antibiotics can do an archive search on APOD to see if I'm right about that. |
12-29-2016, 08:00 AM | #3 |
™
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 27,717
|
Andromeda galaxy "angular diameter is 178x63 arc-minutes.". And the moon is roughly 30 arc-minutes. So this looks twice as thick as the moon and six times as wide.
If a telephoto lens was used and it was close to the horizon, the sizes could work. But I am also sceptical. Camera sensors have come a long way, but they can't capture that much light without a long exposure. And a long exposure would require tracking the stars, so the mountain would get motion blur. |
12-29-2016, 11:09 AM | #4 |
The future is unwritten
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 71,105
|
I screwed up that link, it should be.
__________________
The descent of man ~ Nixon, Friedman, Reagan, Trump. |
12-29-2016, 02:40 PM | #5 |
The Un-Tuckian
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: South Central...KY that is
Posts: 39,517
|
Nice pics.
Photoshoppery abounds, but, nice pics.
__________________
These statements have not been evaluated by the FDA, EPA, FBI, DEA, CDC, or FDIC. These statements are not intended to diagnose, cause, treat, cure, or prevent any disease. If you feel you have been harmed/offended by, or, disagree with any of the above statements or images, please feel free to fuck right off. |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|