The Cellar  

Go Back   The Cellar > Main > Current Events

Current Events Help understand the world by talking about things happening in it

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-07-2007, 04:50 AM   #1
Cyclefrance
Pump my ride!
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Deep countryside of Surrey , England
Posts: 1,890
Failed procedures = friendly fire = loss of life

Sad sequence of events - right up to the coroner's inquest

The inquest covered the friendly fire incident when a British patrol vehicle was fired upon by a US-manned tank-buster aircarft. Result one dead British soldier.

The coroner had requested footage and audio frrom an on-board recording of the event made in the tank-buster. He eventually got it but as it was 'classified information' he was not allowed to disclose the details to the inquest.

The coroner walked out of the proceedings in disgust and then a UK newspaper - The Sun - somehow obtained a copy of the video and published its details. The ausio has been widely heard on British news programmes as a result - plus the US have confirmed that the video is now de-classified

Overall, a sorry mess. The crew were clearly extremely distraught as soon as they discovered that they had fired on a British vehicle, but two lapses in procedures caused this event - first they were advised by ground intelligence that there were no friendly vehicles in the area where this vehicle had been spotted, second the crew of the tank-buster fired on the vehicle without obtaining the necessary clearance to do so.

That the crew had believed this to be a rocket-launching vehicle from its colouration goes some way to understanding why they may have gone for a 'fire first, ask questions later' approach, perhaps as a protective measure (fearing a rocket assault upon their aircraft), but perhaps of equal concern is the reluctance and instransigence of the authorities therefater, in their refusal to de-classify the video - until embarassed into the act of having to do so. Let's face it, exposure of ones faults is generally the best catalyst to ensuring they are remedied.

Let's hope for the improvements on the ground, in the air and in the bureacracy that this sorry tale demands take place.
__________________
Always sufficient hills - never sufficient gears
Cyclefrance is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-07-2007, 05:59 AM   #2
Beestie
-◊|≡·∙■·∙≡|◊-
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Parts unknown.
Posts: 4,081
God, can we please just get the hell out of there.

50 years from now, history will show that we accomplished nothing.
__________________
Beestie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-07-2007, 06:38 AM   #3
Griff
still says videotape
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Posts: 26,813
That was a terrible turn of events. We lost another local soldier about two weeks ago. I think they buried him yesterday. I really don't think the politicians understand what they commit to when they make war.
__________________
If you would only recognize that life is hard, things would be so much easier for you.
- Louis D. Brandeis
Griff is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-07-2007, 08:06 AM   #4
tw
Read? I only know how to write.
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 11,933
Quote:
Originally Posted by Beestie View Post
God, can we please just get the hell out of there.

50 years from now, history will show that we accomplished nothing.
One president saw the same thing happening and got us out. The president: Clinton. The country: Somalia. Now all those Somalian terrorists are here coming to get us because we did not stop them there.

Its interesting to here the same story told by US and UK press. US press tends to forget those A-10 pilots did not get permission to fire. The UK reports tend to forget the A-10 pilots asked four times whether the tanks were friendly.

And both sides don't discuss another yet resolved question: two pilots new to combat and apparently lost; not where they thought they were.
tw is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-07-2007, 03:40 PM   #5
jaguar
whig
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Posts: 5,075
hm. good to see the same folks still round here.

I think most of the Somalian 'terrorists' are currently enjoying a light sprinkling of Ethiopian munitions while hiding in the marshes because the US pulled out. They beat the warlords after a decade then effectively got told to get fucked by the rest of the population when the Ethiopians came knocking because they were irritating tightwads who didn't quite appreciate the colour local life. TO be specific they didn't like qat. The locals really, really liked qat. Qat won.
__________________
Good friends, good books and a sleepy conscience: this is the ideal life.
- Twain

Last edited by jaguar; 02-07-2007 at 03:46 PM.
jaguar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-07-2007, 05:52 PM   #6
Ronald Cherrycoke
Master Locutor
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 153
Friendly fire happens in every war...and will continue until we come up with magic bombs and bullets that only kill the enemy.






Operation Cobra 25-29 July 1944

The date for the attack was originally set for July 18. However, poor weather delayed the attack several times, and Montgomery had told Bradley that he need not rush the operation. The date was eventually finalized for July 24. However, poor weather on that day forced Leigh-Mallory to postpone for 24 hours. Some heavy bombers from the Eighth Air Force did not get the recall order and proceeded with their mission. About 335 B-17s, some hindered by poor visibility, dropped 685 tons of bombs. Some of the bombs fell on US positions, despite the planning done to prevent just such an occurrence. Bradley had specifically requested that the aircraft approach the target area by flying parallel to the front in order to minimize the risk of friendly fire. Although he believed the air commanders had committed to the parallel route, in fact only the fighter-bombers of the 9th Tactical Air Force approached the target parallel to the front. The bomber units had made no such agreement and approached perpendicular to the front line. The 'short' bomb drops thus fell on the very units that were expected to lead the assault.

Over 100 US soldiers were killed and approximately 500 were wounded. One unit, 1st Battalion, 120th Infantry Regiment, from the 30th Infantry Division, suffered 25 soldiers killed and 131 wounded. Perhaps the most notable soldier to die was General Lesley J. McNair.

Last edited by Ronald Cherrycoke; 02-07-2007 at 05:57 PM.
Ronald Cherrycoke is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-08-2007, 09:10 AM   #7
Cyclefrance
Pump my ride!
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Deep countryside of Surrey , England
Posts: 1,890
Human habit of repeating previous errors - the knowldge that could prevent this all too often dies with the relevant generation.

Additional info:

- the incident actually dates back to 2003 - it's just happened to have taken 3 years to get to the inquest stage

- the tank-buster crew were subjected to investigation but no blame was attached to their actions and the ruling was that correct procedures had been followed

- the US administration denied initially that no such recording of the event ever existed - I'm not sure how it came about that the existence of a tape eventually became known

- the individual who fired on the British vehicle has advanced through the ranks since the incident - it was reported on BBC news last night that he is now a colonel - The Sun newspaper today names Col Gus Kohntopp as the pilot who fired the shots.
__________________
Always sufficient hills - never sufficient gears
Cyclefrance is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-08-2007, 05:47 PM   #8
footfootfoot
To shreds, you say?
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: in the house and on the street-how many, many feet we meet!
Posts: 18,449
Quote:
Originally Posted by Griff View Post
That was a terrible turn of events. We lost another local soldier about two weeks ago. I think they buried him yesterday. I really don't think the politicians understand what they commit to when they make war.
Pass the bong over here. Are you really saying that politicians get as far in their careers as they do without knowing exactly how to lie to themselves and anyone within earshot about what they do?

The scary thing is that they know exactly what "collateral damage" is and they have body guards to run interference from enraged parents of dead children.

The alarming absence of children of politicians on the front lines would lend credence to my theory.
__________________
The internet is a hateful stew of vomit you can never take completely seriously. - Her Fobs
footfootfoot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-08-2007, 06:05 PM   #9
Ronald Cherrycoke
Master Locutor
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 153
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cyclefrance View Post
Human habit of repeating previous errors - the knowldge that could prevent this all too often dies with the relevant generation.

Additional info:

- the incident actually dates back to 2003 - it's just happened to have taken 3 years to get to the inquest stage

- the tank-buster crew were subjected to investigation but no blame was attached to their actions and the ruling was that correct procedures had been followed

- the US administration denied initially that no such recording of the event ever existed - I'm not sure how it came about that the existence of a tape eventually became known

- the individual who fired on the British vehicle has advanced through the ranks since the incident - it was reported on BBC news last night that he is now a colonel - The Sun newspaper today names Col Gus Kohntopp as the pilot who fired the shots.

Human habit of repeating previous errors - the knowldge that could prevent this all too often dies with the relevant generation.


In some professions there will always be a chance of an accident regardless of safeguards...the military happens to be one.



- the individual who fired on the British vehicle has advanced through the ranks since the incident - it was reported on BBC news last night that he is now a colonel - The Sun newspaper today names Col Gus Kohntopp as the pilot who fired the shots.


So what... if it was an accident and he was not to blame or court marshaled...why shouldn`t he be promoted. If you don`t get promoted in the military you might as well leave.
Ronald Cherrycoke is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-08-2007, 09:37 PM   #10
Ronald Cherrycoke
Master Locutor
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 153
'Friendly fire' a tragic part of modern war

Last Updated: 12:01am BST 01/04/2003




The harrowing interview with the commander of the Household Cavalry Scimitar reconnaissance vehicle, telling of how his patrol was shot up by a US A10 tankbuster aircraft, was a grisly echo of the killing of nine British soldiers in the 1991 Gulf war by a similar aircraft.

It is an appallingly tragic fact of this war that the same number of British soldiers have been killed by their own side as by the Iraqis.

So far five of the 25 British servicemen have been killed in friendly fire incidents, three of those by US forces. Another 15 have died in accidents.


America's most senior military official has apologised for two US friendly fire incidents which killed three British soldiers. General Richard Myers, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, said he would make it his "quest" to ensure it did not happen again.

Two RAF pilots were killed 10 days ago when their GR4 Tornado was shot down near the Kuwaiti border by a Patriot missile, while on Friday Lance Corporal of Horse Matty Hull died when a US A10 tankbuster aircraft fired on two armoured vehicles.

In the sanitised language of warfare, such friendly fire killings are known as fratricide or "blue-on-blue" - a reference to the colour used to mark friendly troops on maps.

But no matter what term is used, such deaths have been, and can be expected to remain, a constant feature of war, a product of the unimaginable stress and confusion that defines the battlefield.

A 1993 study conducted by the Pentagon of medical records from World War II, Korea, Vietnam, and the Gulf War, concluded that nearly 15 per cent of US casualties were the result of fratricide.

The gruesome and bitter fighting of the First World War saw countless episodes of troops firing on their own side.

Typical of these was the experience of the Australian 50th Infantry Battalion in April 1918 during the second battle of Villers-Bretonneux.

Despite heavy enemy fire, the Australians advanced steadily towards the German trenches under cover of the darkness. As they neared the German position, several shots were fired at them from close in front, someone yelled "Bomb the b*******," grenades were thrown, and a rush of the trench was made.

The trench proved to be occupied not by Germans, but by remnants of the Devon and Worcester Battalions.

One of the worst episodes in the Second World War was the invasion by 35,000 US and Canadian troops of Kiska, an Aleutian island, in August 1943.

The allies believed the island to be held in strength by the Japanese. The assault was complicated by dense fog. Bitter fighting continued through the night, and 28 men died and 50 were wounded.

It was only later discovered there were no Japanese on the island at all.

In the 1950-53 Korean War the 1st Argyll and Sutherland Highlanders where ordered to seize a key hill. They succeeded - but then an American ground attack aircraft arrived and dropped napalm on them.

The lucky ones were the 17 who died instantly. Another 76 suffered horrific burns in the inferno.

Mistakes in war are the consequence of what the great Prussian military thinker, Carl von Clausewitz, called "friction", which he identifies as "the only concept that more or less corresponds to the factors that distinguish real war from war on paper".

As he observes, "everything in war is simple, but the simplest thing is difficult. The difficulties accumulate, and end by producing a kind of friction that is inconceivable. This tremendous friction . . . is everywhere in contact with chance, and brings about effects that cannot be measured, just because they are largely due to chance."




http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main...1/nbrit101.xml
Ronald Cherrycoke is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-09-2007, 03:42 AM   #11
DanaC
We have to go back, Kate!
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Yorkshire
Posts: 25,964
Hiya jaguar! long time no see

This whole incident is tragic and has been handled appallingly. I feel sorry though for the two soldiers at the centre of this. They must feel terrible.
DanaC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-09-2007, 03:44 AM   #12
DanaC
We have to go back, Kate!
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Yorkshire
Posts: 25,964
Quote:
Typical of these was the experience of the Australian 50th Infantry Battalion in April 1918 during the second battle of Villers-Bretonneux.

Despite heavy enemy fire, the Australians advanced steadily towards the German trenches under cover of the darkness. As they neared the German position, several shots were fired at them from close in front, someone yelled "Bomb the b*******," grenades were thrown, and a rush of the trench was made.

The trench proved to be occupied not by Germans, but by remnants of the Devon and Worcester Battalions.
There are also numerous accounts of British mustard gas being used which blew back in the wind and gassed our own troops in their trenches.
DanaC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-09-2007, 04:13 AM   #13
Sundae
polaroid of perfection
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: West Yorkshire
Posts: 24,185
Quote:
Originally Posted by DanaC View Post
This whole incident is tragic and has been handled appallingly. I feel sorry though for the two soldiers at the centre of this. They must feel terrible.
Did you see the man interviewed in the pilot's home town on ITV last night?

I'm paraphrasing here but he said something along the lines of the pilot was a hero, America needed more heroes like him and so did the world. America was trying to stamp out terrorism and our whole little country and all of Europe too needed to stop sucking our thumbs like we did in World War 2. America didn't need our help as they knew we couldn't communicate, move and shoot at the same time, but they needed our cooperation.....

It was deeply unpleasant to watch, but what annoyed me was the fact that ITV chose to broadcast it. I doubt they could have found a more divisive clip to show if they'd scripted it themselves. Why they feel people goaded into a knee-jerk us-and-them reaction (both the man interviewed and those watching) will help the matter I don't know.
__________________
Life's hard you know, so strike a pose on a Cadillac
Sundae is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-09-2007, 07:55 AM   #14
Cyclefrance
Pump my ride!
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Deep countryside of Surrey , England
Posts: 1,890
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ronald Cherrycoke View Post

Human habit of repeating previous errors - the knowldge that could prevent this all too often dies with the relevant generation.


In some professions there will always be a chance of an accident regardless of safeguards...the military happens to be one.



- the individual who fired on the British vehicle has advanced through the ranks since the incident - it was reported on BBC news last night that he is now a colonel - The Sun newspaper today names Col Gus Kohntopp as the pilot who fired the shots.


So what... if it was an accident and he was not to blame or court marshaled...why shouldn`t he be promoted. If you don`t get promoted in the military you might as well leave.
...and it looks as though he may be leading a squadron or two in Iraq again as his unit looks set to be called up again as a part of Bush's next big push. Should be no problem there as he is known to follow procedures and, of course, there won't be any cockpit record anyway....

I think the point that this brings out is that the media always dig deeper than is necessary - opinions can be influenced by what comes out. Just shows how much better it is to be honest and open at the outset (and to actually strive to learn from mistakes rather than what we have here - procedures that have faults being accepted as satisfactory - so nothing is done to change them). In this particular case, with the media looking to 'right the wrong' both living victims of the events have now been needlessly exposed to information that may not be pertinent - that's the widow as well as the pilot.
__________________
Always sufficient hills - never sufficient gears
Cyclefrance is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-09-2007, 10:22 AM   #15
tw
Read? I only know how to write.
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 11,933
Ronald Cherrycoke posts that because failure had happened, then failures must always happen. Same reasoning from Townsend and Richardo to run Chrysler into near bankruptcy. Same reason used by Roger Smith to claim failures are acceptable as he destroy American jobs and lives.

When GM managers went to Japan, they see assmebly lines without 25% of the products pulled aside for rework. Another Cherrycoke type claims Japan must be hiding their product failures? No. To that GM executive, failure was acceptable. Sound familiar, Ronald? It was a mindset common among WWI military commanders who would sacrifice millions to machine guns rather than admit the military commander was defective.

But again, Ronald Cherrycoke is demonstrating for all how a brown shirt thinks. It is normal and acceptable to have blue on blue? Failure is acceptable. It explains his contempt for the American soldier - as well as soldiers of NATO allies.

Clearly failure happened. The problem is not that failure happened. The problem is that a Ronald Cherrycoke mentality exists to hide the failure rather than address it and fix it. Blue on blue occurs do to human failures. The first step to avoiding it is to acknowledge it was completely avoidable. Ronald Cherrycoke, instead, assumes all failures are situation normal - SNAFU. That attitude is contemptable - explains why he also so hates the troops.

Ronald - this is the part where you learn about the world. Learn about why failure is not an option. Start by learning Deming and why failures are traceable only to those who all but want failures.
tw is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:29 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.