The Cellar  

Go Back   The Cellar > Main > Current Events

Current Events Help understand the world by talking about things happening in it

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 06-30-2011, 01:12 PM   #856
Fair&Balanced
Operations Operative
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 495
I agreed and acknowledged that using the word "every" was incorrect.

But I guess the chracterization of "bullshit" beyond that is in the eyes of the beholder.

Honestly, I am constantly amused at the over reaction by some on the right in so many discussions here.

But I guess thats life in the Cellar.
Fair&Balanced is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-30-2011, 02:32 PM   #857
tw
Read? I only know how to write.
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 11,933
I need not listen to talk radio. I simply read here what Limbaugh, Beck, and Hannity have told us to believe.

The entire substance of multiple hour talk shows can be learned in the one soundbyte posted here.

117 papers proved global warming does not exist. That was the entire claim. Nothing in those papers proved it. Does not matter. Extremists only memorize soundbytes. Interesting to hear what extremist talk show audiences remember most. Only one number remembered - 117.
tw is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-30-2011, 02:55 PM   #858
Pete Zicato
Turns out my CRS is a symptom of TMB.
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Chicago suburbs
Posts: 2,916
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fair&Balanced View Post
I agreed and acknowledged that using the word "every" was incorrect.
I have a suspicion that you'd even be incorrect to use "most".

The government has occasionally aided and abetted innovation. But that's because "A fool must now and then be right, by chance." (William Cowper)

All arguments of these sort are disagreements as to the role of government. Personally, I don't want to depend on government for innovation.
__________________


Talk nerdy to me.
Pete Zicato is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-30-2011, 04:24 PM   #859
Fair&Balanced
Operations Operative
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 495
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pete Zicato View Post
I have a suspicion that you'd even be incorrect to use "most".

The government has occasionally aided and abetted innovation. But that's because "A fool must now and then be right, by chance." (William Cowper)

All arguments of these sort are disagreements as to the role of government. Personally, I don't want to depend on government for innovation.
I would disagree. The government role in R&D has been more than occasionally aiding and abetting.

As I noted earlier, it started with the law in the 1860s that established land grant colleges in every state to focus in part on promoting industrialization. It grew in the earlier 20th century with the establishment of the National Bureau of Standards and the National Research Council. And from post WW II through the peak of the space age (1970s), the government spent more on R&D than the private sector.

My position is that because we are now investing less than the governments of other industrialized countries we are falling behind and will be buying future technologies, from next generation car batteries to clean energy technologies, from foreign companies.

I also think the idea of depending on government for innovation misses the point. Government funds the foundation (where the cost outweighs any short term direct benefits) so that the private sector can build on that foundation and innovate.

Without the foundation, innovation will not occur as rapidly. And that is how we fall behind other industrialized countries in a global economy.
Fair&Balanced is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-30-2011, 04:40 PM   #860
piercehawkeye45
Franklin Pierce
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 3,695
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pete Zicato View Post
All arguments of these sort are disagreements as to the role of government. Personally, I don't want to depend on government for innovation.
Pete, it isn't a public versus private sector competition when it comes to innovation. You cannot just generalized "alternative energy should be produced from the private (or public) sector due to (insert argument that backs up your claim)." That isn't how it works. Most of the large issues that science faces today are so complex and research is so expensive that the public and private sector must work together in order to solve them. Here is a simplified example of how innovation works nowadays:

Professor 1 gets government funding and comes up with some device that successfully manipulates flowing water into energy. This device is extremely expensive and would be extremely difficult to scale to size needed to actually power a grid. This device currently will not make money so the private companies stay away from it. Professor 2 gets more government funding and comes up with a way to scale the device into the size that can be used to power a grid. Company 1, who has been following the progress of the device all along, now begins to research a way to make the device cheaper and more efficient, with the help of professor 1 and 2. Now that this device is an economically viable option, it gets built and further research is done in both the public and private sectors to make the device even better.

Was this innovation a result of the public or private sector? The answer is neither. If it was solely up to the public or private sector this device would never be made (in a way that could be used). It was the combination of the two that allowed it to be successful.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fair&Balanced
I also think the idea of depending on government for innovation misses the point. Government funds the foundation (where the cost outweighs any short term direct benefits) so that the private sector can build on that foundation and innovate.

Without the foundation, innovation will not occur as rapidly. And that is how we fall behind other industrialized countries in a global economy.
Yup. Government funding gives institutions the chance to develop all sorts of different theories and technologies that companies sort through to find something that they can use.
__________________
I like my perspectives like I like my baseball caps: one size fits all.
piercehawkeye45 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-30-2011, 04:55 PM   #861
Fair&Balanced
Operations Operative
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 495
The American Academy for the Advancement of Sciences has a brief report on the subject.

http://www.aaas.org/spp/rd/presentat...rcanada908.pdf

Today, R&D funding is 1/3 government and 2/3 private, with the government spending in current dollars relatively flat for the last 30+ years. (see chart on page 5).

The report concludes: Current policy concerns
- Despite large industry investments in R&D, U.S. policymakers are concerned about the state of U.S. innovation and competitiveness.

- U.S. R&D/GDP ratio and other indicators are steady or declining, while other nations are growing (esp. Asian nations) -- (chart on page 7)

IMO, that is a bad trend for our long term economic competitiveness.
Fair&Balanced is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-30-2011, 06:02 PM   #862
infinite monkey
Person who doesn't update the user title
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 13,002
Hey ut sorry about earlier. I don't feel well and I'm grumpy.
infinite monkey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-01-2011, 06:02 AM   #863
sexobon
I love it when a plan comes together.
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 9,793
The ensemble is complete:

piercehawkeye45 ___ Snow White
tw _______________ Queen
Spexxvet _________ Huntsman
xoxoxoBruce _______ Prince

Coign _____________ Dopey
Fair&Balanced ______ Happy
TheMercenary ______ Doc
BigV ______________ Sneezy
Pete Zicato ________ Sleepy
Undertoad _________ Bashful

and introducing:

infinite monkey _____ Grumpy
sexobon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-01-2011, 10:04 AM   #864
Fair&Balanced
Operations Operative
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 495
Don't Worry, Be Happy
Fair&Balanced is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-02-2011, 07:09 AM   #865
TheMercenary
“Hypocrisy: prejudice with a halo”
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Savannah, Georgia
Posts: 21,393
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fair&Balanced View Post
The American Academy for the Advancement of Sciences has a brief report on the subject.

http://www.aaas.org/spp/rd/presentat...rcanada908.pdf

Today, R&D funding is 1/3 government and 2/3 private, with the government spending in current dollars relatively flat for the last 30+ years. (see chart on page 5).

The report concludes: Current policy concerns
- Despite large industry investments in R&D, U.S. policymakers are concerned about the state of U.S. innovation and competitiveness.

- U.S. R&D/GDP ratio and other indicators are steady or declining, while other nations are growing (esp. Asian nations) -- (chart on page 7)

IMO, that is a bad trend for our long term economic competitiveness.
Typical Progressive response. Tax, Spend, and throw money at it! That will solve all our problems!
__________________
Anyone but the this most fuked up President in History in 2012!
TheMercenary is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-02-2011, 07:30 AM   #866
Fair&Balanced
Operations Operative
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 495
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheMercenary View Post
Typical Progressive response. Tax, Spend, and throw money at it! That will solve all our problems!
Hardly a progressive response given that the US govt has been investing in R&D at a significant level since the 1950s, only leveling off in the Bush years to pay for a war and tax cuts that primarily benefit the top taxpayers.

You can ignore the economic impact, but that wont change the fact that in a global economy, if we dont invest, we dont compete on a level playing field.
Fair&Balanced is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-02-2011, 07:33 AM   #867
TheMercenary
“Hypocrisy: prejudice with a halo”
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Savannah, Georgia
Posts: 21,393
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fair&Balanced View Post
Hardly a progressive response given that the US govt has been investing in R&D at a significant level since the 1950s, only leveling off in the Bush years to pay for a war and tax cuts that primarily benefit the top taxpayers.

You can ignore the economic impact, but that wont change the fact that in a global economy, if we dont invest, we dont compete on a level playing field.
Sort of like the ponzi scheme of Cap and Trade? Rigggghttttt......
__________________
Anyone but the this most fuked up President in History in 2012!
TheMercenary is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-02-2011, 07:37 AM   #868
TheMercenary
“Hypocrisy: prejudice with a halo”
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Savannah, Georgia
Posts: 21,393
__________________
Anyone but the this most fuked up President in History in 2012!
TheMercenary is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-02-2011, 07:40 AM   #869
Fair&Balanced
Operations Operative
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 495
Do you think those diversions really contribute to a discussion of the need to invest in R&D to remain economically competitive?
Fair&Balanced is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-02-2011, 07:44 AM   #870
TheMercenary
“Hypocrisy: prejudice with a halo”
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Savannah, Georgia
Posts: 21,393
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fair&Balanced View Post
Do you think those diversions really contribute to a discussion of the need to invest in R&D to remain economically competitive?
Oh, you mean like this one?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fair&Balanced View Post
Don't Worry, Be Happy
You are such a tool...
__________________
Anyone but the this most fuked up President in History in 2012!
TheMercenary is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:46 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.