The Cellar  

Go Back   The Cellar > Main > Politics
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Politics Where we learn not to think less of others who don't share our views

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-08-2005, 03:40 PM   #1
Troubleshooter
The urban Jane Goodall
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Florida
Posts: 3,012
The Next You Need a Cop, Call a Panhandler!

http://www.reason.com/hitandrun/2005...t_you_ne.shtml

Via reader Russ Dewey comes this To the People bit about how Washington State troopers are making it that much easier to hate the fuzz with the white-hot intensity of a thousand suns:

Washington State troopers have been posing as panhandlers (who skirt entrapment laws by allegedly neither asking for nor accepting money) in order to sidle up to the cars of unsuspecting motorists as part of an elaborate scheme to spy whether the operator is wearing a seatbelt. Those who aren't are then busted by another cop radioed by the "panhandler" -- who sometimes holds a "happy holidays" sign -- and given a ticket for $101 or worse. Some of the ticketed motorists have been so kind as to offer the "panhandler" money (which the officer -- again allegedly -- rejects).

I can already anticipate the conservative backlash to this policy: Why are those motherfuckin' cops holding Happy Holidays signs rather than Merry Christmas signs? Can't you just hear Catholic League capo Bill Donoghue shouting, "This clearly demonstrates that the Bush administration cops have suffered a loss of will and that they have capitulated to the worst elements in our culture."
__________________
I have gained this from philosophy: that I do without being commanded what others do only from fear of the law. - Aristotle
Troubleshooter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-08-2005, 04:36 PM   #2
glatt
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 27,717
People will stop giving money to panhandlers now, because they will be afraid they are cops.
glatt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-08-2005, 06:50 PM   #3
marichiko
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Not wearing your seatbelt is a relatively minor infraction of the law. The person you are most likely to harm is yourself if you're in an accident. Don't these cops have actual crimes they should be taking care of?

And why do they need to pose as panhandlers if they really are concerned about this crime wave of seatbelt scoff-laws in Washington? A person can get themselves a lawn chair and just sit near a street light on the sidewalk and watch the passengers and drivers of the cars that go by. You can get a pretty good look at the people inside a stopped car at a street light. It would be much easier. Or stand out there holding a sign that says "Lost Cat!" or some other neutral thing. Sounds more like a crack down on panhandlers to me.
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-08-2005, 08:51 PM   #4
xoxoxoBruce
The future is unwritten
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 71,105
When they come to the car window.....mace 'em.
__________________
The descent of man ~ Nixon, Friedman, Reagan, Trump.
xoxoxoBruce is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-08-2005, 09:06 PM   #5
Elspode
When Do I Get Virtual Unreality?
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Raytown, Missouri
Posts: 12,719
I just want them to be honest and admit that it is about generating revenue, and has nothing to do with public safety.
__________________
"To those of you who are wearing ties, I think my dad would appreciate it if you took them off." - Robert Moog
Elspode is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-09-2005, 03:11 AM   #6
lookout123
changed his status to single
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Right behind you. No, the other side.
Posts: 10,308
Quote:
People will stop giving money to panhandlers now, because they will be afraid they are cops.
nope, i quit giving to the panhandlers in phoenix when i saw a van "changing the shift" so to speak. picking up one guy and dropping another off. they kept the same sign though, so maybe it was a family affair.

want to piss a panhandler off? offer them a gift certificate to a restaurant.

Els - you are right - it is pure revenue. although i i don't suggest saying that while under oath. i did. it was worth it though, because i happened to have the $$ available to pay the contempt fine and i liked seeing the identical expressions of dismay and outrage on the faces of cop and judge. effffffff 'em.
lookout123 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:51 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.