The Cellar  

Go Back   The Cellar > Main > Home Base

Home Base A starting point, and place for threads don't seem to belong anywhere else

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 06-19-2010, 07:36 AM   #46
casimendocina
Professor
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,622
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shawnee123 View Post
My brother asked me about the 'you and I/you and me' thing. I told him whatever works alone is what you use.

You and I went to the movies. (I went to the movies.)

It doesn't matter to you and me. (It doesn't matter to me.)


I hear it misused by some fairly intelligent folks.
Wouldn't you just say "We went to the movies" (Here 'you' and 'I' is being used as a subject.
AND
"It doesn't matter to us/either of us" (whereas here it's being used as an object and this is what determines which pronoun you use).

If I've missed the point completely (entirely possible), let me know immediately.
casimendocina is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-19-2010, 10:16 PM   #47
Shawnee123
Why, you're a regular Alfred E Einstein, ain't ya?
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 21,206
You've missed the point completely.

Those sentences were just simple ones I came up with to make the point. No one ever has to go to the movies if they don't want to.
__________________
A word to the wise ain't necessary - it's the stupid ones who need the advice.
--Bill Cosby
Shawnee123 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-22-2010, 03:04 PM   #48
BigV
Goon Squad Leader
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Seattle
Posts: 27,063
Quote:
Originally Posted by Undertoad View Post
It's a singulare tantum, according to the plurale tantum Wikipedia page.
"This is the evidence."

"These are the evidence."

I stand corrected. Undertoad is right, singulare tantum. Evidence is "singular".
__________________
Be Just and Fear Not.
BigV is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-22-2010, 03:08 PM   #49
Cloud
...
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 8,360
So, to reiterate:

"
Quote:
The only evidence were the affidavits."

Now, to me, that's incorrect agreement between the subject and verb. If "evidence" is the subject, then it should read, "The only evidence was the affidavits."
Do you think I'm right, and it should read, "The only evidence was . . . "?
__________________
"Guard your honor. Let your reputation fall where it will. And outlive the bastards!"
Cloud is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-22-2010, 05:31 PM   #50
BigV
Goon Squad Leader
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Seattle
Posts: 27,063
I think it is an unnecessarily awkward construction. I think your suggestion is an improvement. I think another improvement would be "The affidavits were...". That way you can marry the subject/verb agreement *and* keep the original singular evidence.
__________________
Be Just and Fear Not.
BigV is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-22-2010, 08:26 PM   #51
Cloud
...
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 8,360
thanks.
__________________
"Guard your honor. Let your reputation fall where it will. And outlive the bastards!"
Cloud is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-23-2010, 12:29 PM   #52
Undertoad
Radical Centrist
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Cottage of Prussia
Posts: 31,423
Quote:
Originally Posted by BigV View Post
Undertoad is right, singulare tantum. Evidence is "singular".
How about "advice", I was just thinking about that word, is that plural or singluarey?

"I got lots of advice"

"I got one person's advice"

but one wouldn't say "I got a good advice from my friend"
Undertoad is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-23-2010, 12:40 PM   #53
glatt
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 27,717
same with "water" and "smoke"
glatt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-23-2010, 12:41 PM   #54
Shawnee123
Why, you're a regular Alfred E Einstein, ain't ya?
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 21,206
Yeah, it would be "some good smoke" as in "damn, that was some good smoke your friend had."
__________________
A word to the wise ain't necessary - it's the stupid ones who need the advice.
--Bill Cosby
Shawnee123 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-23-2010, 12:51 PM   #55
glatt
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 27,717
Although I suppose you could say you want a smoke.
glatt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-23-2010, 01:09 PM   #56
limey
Encroaching on your decrees
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: An island within the south-west coast of Scotland
Posts: 7,016
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cloud View Post
So, to reiterate:

"

Do you think I'm right, and it should read, "The only evidence was . . . "?
[professional linguist]Yes. [/professional linguist]
__________________
Living it up on the edge ... of civilisation, within the southwest coast of
limey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-23-2010, 01:28 PM   #57
BigV
Goon Squad Leader
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Seattle
Posts: 27,063
Quote:
Originally Posted by Undertoad View Post
How about "advice", I was just thinking about that word, is that plural or singluarey?

"I got lots of advice"

"I got one person's advice"

but one wouldn't say "I got a good advice from my friend"
Quote:
Originally Posted by glatt View Post
same with "water" and "smoke"
"This is my advice."
"These are my advice."

"This is the water."
"These are the water."

"This is smoke."
"These are the smoke."

In each case, these words ring singular to my ear. So, since there isn't a plural form of these words, that makes them singulare tantum. Additionally, they are examples of mass nouns. Ones that can't be quantified by a number, in contrast to collective nouns, as Cloud identified "evidence" earlier, in error I believe. I think evidence is another mass noun.

Also, in the examples quoted above, the change in subj/verb agreement was happening with the count modifier. "This is the (one)" "These are the (several)". The very fact that you attach this counter is because they're uncountable. What you are counting is not advice, it's "lots" or "person".
__________________
Be Just and Fear Not.
BigV is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2010, 08:29 AM   #58
HungLikeJesus
Only looks like a disaster tourist
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: above 7,000 feet
Posts: 7,208
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shawnee123 View Post
My brother asked me about the 'you and I/you and me' thing. I told him whatever works alone is what you use.

You and I went to the movies. (I went to the movies.)

It doesn't matter to you and me. (It doesn't matter to me.)


I hear it misused by some fairly intelligent folks.
When I leave a voice message for my wife I often start with, "Hey, it's me..."

But I wonder if it shoud be "Hey, it is I..."
__________________
Keep Your Bodies Off My Lawn

SteveDallas's Random Thread Picker.
HungLikeJesus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2010, 08:32 AM   #59
Shawnee123
Why, you're a regular Alfred E Einstein, ain't ya?
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 21,206
Probably, but it is a causal relationship where casual created a casualty of the more formal language.
Quote:
But I wonder if it shoud be "Hey, it is I..."
I call, therefore I am.
__________________
A word to the wise ain't necessary - it's the stupid ones who need the advice.
--Bill Cosby
Shawnee123 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2010, 08:36 AM   #60
HungLikeJesus
Only looks like a disaster tourist
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: above 7,000 feet
Posts: 7,208
I blame it all on Janis Joplin and Kris Kristopherson.
__________________
Keep Your Bodies Off My Lawn

SteveDallas's Random Thread Picker.
HungLikeJesus is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:34 AM.


Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.