The Cellar  

Go Back   The Cellar > Images > Image of the Day

Image of the Day Images that will blow your mind - every day. [Blog] [RSS] [XML]

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 12-07-2006, 07:56 AM   #1
Undertoad
Radical Centrist
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Cottage of Prussia
Posts: 31,423
December 7, 2006: Bad skiing in Alps



Well this is one of those I's of the D that just strike me, in a strange way. I don't know if it'll strike you too. There's nothing immediately mind-boggling about it, but it tells a very large story that gets larger the longer you think about it.

What you're looking at there is the bottom of a ski run in Val Gardena, Italy. Officials are trying to figure out whether to cancel World Cup races that are scheduled to be held there. There have already been several races cancelled this year.

In one sense, it's fascinating to see snow making and snow management reach the point where they could concentrate all of it on one particular run. Fascinating to see what they'll do to try to put on the event.

In another sense, it's evidence of a larger story, because the Alps are experiencing their warmest period in 1300 years.

Of course, you don't want to connect the picture to the global warming theories, because it's only evidence of one area during one particular month. And you don't want to specifically look for evidence of global warming, because if you look for it, you'll find it. Psychologists call it Confirmation bias, a tendency to search for or interpret information in a way that confirms one's preconceptions. If it's freezing cold, you don't put it into your pile of evidence; if it's warm, you do.

(At this point, I believe there is roughly 99% scientific consensus that warming is occurring, two-thirds consensus about man's role in it and no consensus whatsoever about what should be done.)
Undertoad is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-2006, 08:27 AM   #2
Sheldonrs
Master Dwellar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 4,412
Global Warming Critic: "Move along people, nothing to see here". "Just a natural phenomenon".
__________________
Laugh and the world laughs with you; cry and the world laughs AT you.
Sheldonrs is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-2006, 08:42 AM   #3
kelso
Resident-in-Training
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Colombia
Posts: 7
When I lived in a ski village in Switzerland this is what we kept a pair of rock skis for, usually at the beginning and end of the winter season.
kelso is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-2006, 09:00 AM   #4
Emrikol
Compatriot-at-Arms
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 107
Duh. Simple answer: Nuclear Winter
Emrikol is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-2006, 09:22 AM   #5
Bromskloss
Breaking
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 29
Consensus

Quote:
(At this point, I believe there is roughly 99% scientific consensus that warming is occurring, two-thirds consensus about man's role in it and no consensus whatsoever about what should be done.
Really? Where did you get that from? I can absolutetly not say I'm sure myself, but I definitely have gotten another picture. Let me split it up:
  1. Is warming occuring?
  2. If yes, is it caused by man?
  3. If yes again, what should be done?
  1. I don't know what is asked for here, really. Seems like a matter of how you define "warming".
  2. This is a better question, IMO, but I sure would think there are more than 2/3 answering "yes".
  3. Aren't there some obvious answers to this one? Such as "do not let out CO_2 and similar"?

(How do you write subscripts, btw?)
Bromskloss is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-2006, 09:25 AM   #6
dar512
dar512 is now Pete Zicato
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Chicago suburb
Posts: 4,968
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bromskloss
Aren't there some obvious answers to this one? Such as "do not let out CO_2 and similar"?
That's a lot easier said than done...




Have you seen the fart thread?
__________________
"Against stupidity the gods themselves contend in vain."
-- Friedrich Schiller
dar512 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-2006, 09:43 AM   #7
9th Engineer
Bioengineer and aspiring lawer
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Pittsburgh
Posts: 872
Right, our brilliant and well educated CEO's and other MBA's can't seem to figure out how to reduce emissions without threatening to fire half the workforce. Does anyone have any idea how depressing it is to listen to these people talk about partying 4-5 nights a week while only carrying a basic credit load, and then realize that we're going to rely on them in situations like these? Perhaps we should follow China's example and place engineers in top government and corporate positions!
__________________
The most valuable renewable resource is stupidity.
9th Engineer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-2006, 09:44 AM   #8
Happy Monkey
I think this line's mostly filler.
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: DC
Posts: 13,575
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bromskloss
I don't know what is asked for here, really. Seems like a matter of how you define "warming".
What are the options?
__________________
_________________
|...............| We live in the nick of times.
| Len 17, Wid 3 |
|_______________| [pics]
Happy Monkey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-2006, 09:56 AM   #9
garren_bagley
The Man
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Fort Worth, TX
Posts: 1
If it were too warm.....

....then the artificial snow would melt. What we have here is a lack of precipitation.
garren_bagley is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-2006, 09:57 AM   #10
Undertoad
Radical Centrist
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Cottage of Prussia
Posts: 31,423
on (2) I would love to post a cite, but it's almost impossible to find anything not written by hand-wringers on either side. Last year I saw a set of poll numbers of scientists -- I think, maybe even climate scientists -- that showed an increasing trends in belief in climate change.
Undertoad is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-2006, 10:05 AM   #11
Bromskloss
Breaking
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 29
Quote:
Originally Posted by dar512
That's a lot easier said than done...




Have you seen the fart thread?
Haha. Don't try for too long or you'll turn .
Bromskloss is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-2006, 10:12 AM   #12
Bromskloss
Breaking
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 29
Quote:
Originally Posted by Happy Monkey
What are the options?
The average temperature, over some period of time, rising above some specific value, mabye. What I intended to say is that I'd like to see a more specific question than "are we having a global warming".

But actually, I might have changed my mind right now. Perhaps there is no obvious definition. This would enable one scientist to say "Look, the temperature has gone awry!" while another responds "Kind of looks like the normal noisy curve to me.".
Bromskloss is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-2006, 10:34 AM   #13
bhaemolytic
Person Who Has Posted
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 2
As for the scientific consensus on global warming, here it is, published in Science (a peer-reviewed and arguably one the most respected scientific publications in the world.)

"BEYOND THE IVORY TOWER: The Scientific Consensus on Climate Change" by Naolmi Oreskes. Published in Science 3 December 2004:
Vol. 306. no. 5702, p. 1686

As the author states, "The scientific consensus might, of course, be wrong. If the history of science teaches anything, it is humility, and no one can be faulted for failing to act on what is not known. But our grandchildren will surely blame us if they find that we understood the reality of anthropogenic climate change and failed to do anything about it.

Many details about climate interactions are not well understood, and there are ample grounds for continued research to provide a better basis for understanding climate dynamics. The question of what to do about climate change is also still open. But there is a scientific consensus on the reality of anthropogenic climate change. Climate scientists have repeatedly tried to make this clear. It is time for the rest of us to listen."
bhaemolytic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-2006, 10:41 AM   #14
Undertoad
Radical Centrist
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Cottage of Prussia
Posts: 31,423
I've read Oreskes, and I found it to be crap. here it is, judge for yourself

I've also read posts by climatologists whose published articles were mysteriously ignored by Oreskes although they should have been in her dataset.

I'm not a denier; I just want the science to be right.
Undertoad is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-2006, 10:46 AM   #15
Undertoad
Radical Centrist
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Cottage of Prussia
Posts: 31,423
I might add that the article is not a part of the peer-reviewed section of Science.
Undertoad is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:57 AM.


Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.