The Cellar  

Go Back   The Cellar > Main > Politics

Politics Where we learn not to think less of others who don't share our views

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-20-2016, 05:25 AM   #1
Big Sarge
Werepandas - lurking in your shadows
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: In the Deep South
Posts: 3,408
Does it Matter?

In the grand scheme of politics, does it really matter whom is elected president? I really truly feel the election process is becoming a farce. The true power is with the super pacs that fund politicians across party lines. In my humble opinion, the US is controlled by the military industrial complex and petro dollars.

Tell me if my head is up my ass. At this point, I can't support anyone for president.
__________________
Give a man a match, & he'll be warm for 20 seconds. But toss that man a white phosphorus grenade and he'll be warm for the rest of his life.
Big Sarge is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-20-2016, 05:27 AM   #2
Big Sarge
Werepandas - lurking in your shadows
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: In the Deep South
Posts: 3,408
I'm really stepping into this deep when I formally ask tw to comment.
__________________
Give a man a match, & he'll be warm for 20 seconds. But toss that man a white phosphorus grenade and he'll be warm for the rest of his life.
Big Sarge is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-20-2016, 05:42 AM   #3
DanaC
We have to go back, Kate!
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Yorkshire
Posts: 25,964
The way I see it, speaking as a complete outsider looking in, the president has very little power to make change that flies against the wishes of corporate players, but some power to act if what they hope to achieve is aligned with corporate wishes. Overall, I get the distinct impression that the office of the president is powerless to do much good, but fully able to cause an almighty fuck-up on the world stage.

At best a president may seek to achieve,or may achieve, some amelioration of the worst effects of the corporate stranglehold on american life, and at worst may deepen that hold and/or further mire the country in expensive and damaging conflicts.
__________________
Quote:
There's only so much punishment a man can take in pursuit of punani. - Sundae
http://sites.google.com/site/danispoetry/
DanaC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-20-2016, 05:46 AM   #4
Big Sarge
Werepandas - lurking in your shadows
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: In the Deep South
Posts: 3,408
I see your point Dana and it is a good observation.
__________________
Give a man a match, & he'll be warm for 20 seconds. But toss that man a white phosphorus grenade and he'll be warm for the rest of his life.
Big Sarge is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-20-2016, 07:27 AM   #5
Clodfobble
UNDER CONDITIONAL MITIGATION
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 20,012
With a Congress divided so clearly and viciously along partisan lines, the President's veto power becomes a potent ability. The Congress of recent decades couldn't get a 2/3 majority on practically any subject, no matter how genteel, out of spite for each other. If a Republican had been in place these last four years, we would not have had healthcare reform of any kind. Congressmen sympathetic to the idea wouldn't have even attempted it, because they'd know it would all be vetoed.

When we vote for President, we are effectively voting for what TYPE of laws will get to come out of Congress, and what type of Supreme Court justices will get nominated, both of which do have quite an impact.
Clodfobble is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-20-2016, 10:52 AM   #6
Beest
Adapt and Survive
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Ann Arbor, Mi
Posts: 957
Isn't that kind of how it is supposed to 'work'. The President, or any branch doesn't have ultimate power, they all just lurch along in a general direction influenced by the feeling of the populace.

It would be nice if Congress spent a bit less time just trying to tear the other side down and did some proper work
Beest is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-20-2016, 04:30 PM   #7
Gravdigr
The Un-Tuckian
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: South Central...KY that is
Posts: 39,517
The POTUS is essentially a spokesperson, a mouthpiece.

Whoever wins this next election, it will be a tragedy for the country.

A tragedy, I tell ya.
__________________


These statements have not been evaluated by the FDA, EPA, FBI, DEA, CDC, or FDIC. These statements are not intended to diagnose, cause, treat, cure, or prevent any disease. If you feel you have been harmed/offended by, or, disagree with any of the above statements or images, please feel free to fuck right off.
Gravdigr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-20-2016, 04:31 PM   #8
Gravdigr
The Un-Tuckian
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: South Central...KY that is
Posts: 39,517
Quote:
Originally Posted by Big Sarge View Post
...does it really matter whom is elected president?...
Not this time 'round.
__________________


These statements have not been evaluated by the FDA, EPA, FBI, DEA, CDC, or FDIC. These statements are not intended to diagnose, cause, treat, cure, or prevent any disease. If you feel you have been harmed/offended by, or, disagree with any of the above statements or images, please feel free to fuck right off.
Gravdigr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-21-2016, 10:08 AM   #9
Griff
still says videotape
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Posts: 26,813
Campaign finance along with the revolving door of gov job to corp job are the two main areas I see where the influence is pernicious. Rand Paul and Bernie Sanders were/are the only two to recognize it as a problem. Unfortunately we'd need to boot the corporate boot-lickers from Congress for the next couple cycles to get anything done. It is a difficult play in a country that has lost its belief in democratic process and has two completely corrupted parties. We do need to try.
__________________
If you would only recognize that life is hard, things would be so much easier for you.
- Louis D. Brandeis
Griff is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-21-2016, 04:59 PM   #10
xoxoxoBruce
The future is unwritten
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 71,105
Rand Paul, early in his last campaign, was following his fathers line pretty closely. Then he was called to Washington for a private meeting on K street. When he returned to the campaign he changed his priorities and his war chest swelled considerably. Sounds like he's now speaking from experience.
__________________
The descent of man ~ Nixon, Friedman, Reagan, Trump.
xoxoxoBruce is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-22-2016, 06:22 AM   #11
Griff
still says videotape
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Posts: 26,813
https://www.facebook.com/justin.lind...7575747264455/
__________________
If you would only recognize that life is hard, things would be so much easier for you.
- Louis D. Brandeis
Griff is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2016, 02:36 AM   #12
xoxoxoBruce
The future is unwritten
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 71,105
Vote
Attached Images
 
__________________
The descent of man ~ Nixon, Friedman, Reagan, Trump.
xoxoxoBruce is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2016, 07:38 AM   #13
Undertoad
Radical Centrist
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Cottage of Prussia
Posts: 31,423
if you don't vote, you lose the ability to bitch about the outcome.

~

oh wait, no you don't, you are free to bitch about whatever you like in this god-forsaken world. holy crap all these people worried about fascism are claiming the loss of some sort of right to bitch. how does it work? last time i checked there was no restriction at all. i didn't vote, comments sections are still available to me and people take me the exact same amount of serious.

It's just as effective too. If you elect a fascist, turns out, the complaints become currency! Oh no they don't, it turns out bitching does absolutely nothing. Oh well it was very important that we retained that right!

~

Remember,

"the good person" is the person YOU wanted to win

"the bad person" is the person YOU didn't want

and by definition in a close election where voting would actually matter, half the people are able to find the "bad" in one and the "good" in the other

and which one it is, is actually rather arbitrary and is largely a condition of your psychology, whom you were born to, whom you have spent time with, what happened in your lifetime, and how effective the colors in the logo and lawn signs are

and you've spent half your lifetime living under "bad" people's time in office and you are still here and still have, miraculously, the right to bitch

~

If you want a candidate to win it is a MUCH better use of your time to put up lawn signs, than it is to vote. In fact, if the BAD person wins, and you didn't put up lawn signs, I'm not sure where you are. You could have prevented fascism but all you did was fucking vote. The amount of influence you chose to have resulted in failure. I don't where how you have earned the right to bitch if you didn't put up lawn signs.
Undertoad is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2016, 07:47 AM   #14
glatt
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 27,717
Are lawn signs better than Facebook posts?
glatt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2016, 07:52 AM   #15
Undertoad
Radical Centrist
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Cottage of Prussia
Posts: 31,423
Absolutely. You know who sees lawn signs. Only 20% of the people you think see your FB posts, actually see your FB posts; and those are the people you've already influenced, or been influenced by.
Undertoad is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:33 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.