Quote:
Quote:
|
Ohhhhh, I see. OK. Sure.
|
BITES TONGUE
|
tw sure is right about you sometimes...
I point out a glaring error. You dance and skate and can't concede your Chicken Little tendencies. Just admit it was a bad point? |
Quote:
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/34430893...ith_olbermann/ Or, here: http://www.votesmart.org/speech_deta...rase=&contain= Quote:
|
Quote:
Classic (and Merc) will find small issues to nitpick, as long as it is critical of the Democrats...then duck and weave when called out on the facts or the lack of context in their endless links.....because they care about America first! Or they will just call you a partisan. Its easy to nitpick the health care reform. The process and the results have been far from perfect. But if one focuses on the big picture.....it represents the most comprehensive health care reform ever in the US. And the results, when enacted, are that 30+ million of those currently uninsured will have access to affordable health care. And those 200+ million currently insured will have unprecedented security in knowing that they wont have coverage being denied or go broke as a result of a health issue....and by most objective analyses, they wont see their health care costs continue to rise at unmanageable rates. |
Yabbut, Sherrod Brown, a Demoncratic senator from Rhode Island...
:lol: |
Quote:
|
Quote:
But you go ahead and pat your Demoncratic buddies on the ass and congratulate each other for a partisan Bill that will do little to fix the problems. You are delusional. You traded a bad bill for passing anything at all costs. A very expensive one at that. Quote:
|
Quote:
Quote:
I found an article with information I thought of value and posted it for discussion. Both you and Shaw have glossed over the point of the article and tried to, how did you put it "duck and weave." Instead of discussing what the content was, you focus on a totally insignificant point. Quote:
Quote:
|
Same old tired tune....from both you guys.
Not your game? WTF! All you (both) do is cherry pick articles, never providing full context, and nitpicking minor issues. Or call me a partisan and imply that you are not and make sweeping generalizations that ignore the facts or nitpick more minor points. So whats new? As you suggested....look in the mirror, dude and you will a phony (or two). |
I always provide the link to the entire article for those who wish to read it. Posting the entire article is cumbersome and pointless when one wants to address a particular point being made.
Oh and you STILL haven't address what he said - you're still going on about nothing ... as usual. Where is the true tort reform? What about the medicare cuts and the repeated delays in payments to providers? Why do we need to pay for four years before any change is enacted? Why the elimination of payment codes for providers to pay the specialist for performing an independent physical or for getting a separate history of the patient, or to set a correct diagnosis and returning to the referring physician a written report of the findings? Why does this or rather will this now need to be done repetitiously? I am as much for reform as anyone, but this is not really reform its getting a bill passed so that those in power can say to the sheep that they did something for them come reelection time. The vast majority of reform was stripped out of this bill in order to pass "a bill, any bill." I am not the enemy here and I'm a little tired of being treated as such. Since when did you all stop questioning things. Just because a bill is passed by a D or an R administration doesn't make it inherently good or bad. It still needs to be looked at, reviewed and questioned. |
Quote:
So what? We know there are disagreements between the House and Senate and changes will need to be made that wont please either side 100 percent. That is how the process works. It is called compromise and consensus building. ...but of course, you guys will nitpick the differences and blow them out of proportion or suggest it has never happened before. And in the end, they will agree that it would be a huge mistake to throw out a good bill in pursuit of the perfect bill. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
The public option? Quote:
And, IMO, which I am fully entitled to have whether you like it or no, you are a hypocrite. |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:44 PM. |
Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.