The Cellar

The Cellar (http://cellar.org/index.php)
-   Current Events (http://cellar.org/forumdisplay.php?f=4)
-   -   Earthquake (http://cellar.org/showthread.php?t=21873)

Spexxvet 01-19-2010 10:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by classicman (Post 628173)
Spexxie - you stated your incorrect opinion without any supporting facts or figures. Others proved it wrong with supporting evidence because you were too lazy to do it yourself. Now after you've been proven wrong REPEATEDLY, you call me a moron? :eyebrow:

What was incorrect? I stated that we're giving all this charity to Haiti after the fact, when it would have been better to have contributed before, when it would have helped. Are you saying that this assertion is incorrect? I'm not saying we didn't give them foreign aid, I'm not saying that we should increase foreign aid - I'm saying that it would have been better if we had contributed to charities that help Haiti before the earthquake. Get it?

TheMercenary 01-19-2010 10:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Spexxvet (Post 627948)
We give now, but it's too late. 100,000 people are dead.

That is a completely ridiculous notion.

Shawnee123 01-19-2010 10:43 AM

Do y'all ever get tired of your "strength in numbers" assiness? Stand alone for once, I bet you don't have nearly as much to say, nor will you be nearly so puffed up and stupid looking. Yeah, that'll happen...not a spine between ya.

lumberjim 01-19-2010 10:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pete Zicato (Post 628180)
Not sure what you're getting at. "Due to" is the correct spelling in this context, not "do to".

However, I believe Spexx should have used the phrase "because of" instead.

http://web.ku.edu/~edit/because.html


the irony, dar, was his use of the incorrect spelling whilst calling someone else stupid.

classicman 01-19-2010 10:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Spexxvet (Post 628181)
What was incorrect? I stated that we're giving all this charity to Haiti after the fact, when it would have been better to have contributed before, when it would have helped.

We did.
Quote:

Are you saying that this assertion is incorrect? I'm not saying we didn't give them foreign aid, I'm not saying that we should increase foreign aid - I'm saying that it would have been better if we had contributed to charities that help Haiti before the earthquake. Get it?
You implied and argued that we didn't and you were wrong.
Then you called me a moron for proving you wrong.

xoxoxoBruce 01-19-2010 10:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Spexxvet (Post 628181)
What was incorrect? I stated that we're giving all this charity to Haiti after the fact, when it would have been better to have contributed before, when it would have helped. Are you saying that this assertion is incorrect? I'm not saying we didn't give them foreign aid, I'm not saying that we should increase foreign aid - I'm saying that it would have been better if we had contributed to charities that help Haiti before the earthquake. Get it?

No amount of aid would have stopped the earthquake, and I doubt like hell they would have changed the way they built their buildings. Even in retrospect, your theory doesn't hold up.:headshake

Shawnee123 01-19-2010 10:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by lumberjim (Post 628190)
the irony, dar, was his use of the incorrect spelling whilst calling someone else stupid.

It's damn near rediculous! ;)

classicman 01-19-2010 10:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Shawnee123 (Post 628189)
Do y'all ever get tired of your "strength in numbers" assiness? Stand alone for once, I bet you don't have nearly as much to say, nor will you be nearly so puffed up and stupid looking. Yeah, that'll happen...not a spine between ya.

http://static.briansolis.com/wp-cont...me-4001607.jpg

I've been alone in my opinions since I started posting here. There are however, many instances where others have jumped on the bandwagon and far more times its been against me rather than in support of my positions.

Shawnee123 01-19-2010 10:57 AM

SHORE! Yep!

Shawnee123 01-19-2010 10:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Spexxvet (Post 628166)
And failed due to your stupidity. Good response, moron.

Quote:

Originally Posted by lumberjim (Post 628168)
i loves me some irony.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pete Zicato (Post 628180)
Not sure what you're getting at. "Due to" is the correct spelling in this context, not "do to".

However, I believe Spexx should have used the phrase "because of" instead.

http://web.ku.edu/~edit/because.html

Yeah, I don't get it either. :headshake

jinx 01-19-2010 11:01 AM

What are you doing shawnee?

Shawnee123 01-19-2010 11:03 AM

Trying to figure out why "due to" was incorrect. :confused:

jinx 01-19-2010 11:03 AM

Spexx edited his post obviously.

Shawnee123 01-19-2010 11:05 AM

Oh, I see. Just what merc did with rediculous.

But it's just an old mod trick...only with less window of opportunity.

Aww, don't be ashamed and change your posts for misspellings. Only do so if you regret name-calling and want to hide the proof.

piercehawkeye45 01-19-2010 11:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Spexxvet (Post 628181)
I stated that we're giving all this charity to Haiti after the fact, when it would have been better to have contributed before, when it would have helped. Are you saying that this assertion is incorrect?

In order to have a drastic effect on the amount of deaths due to building infrastructure, the amount of money spent would be MUCH MUCH greater. Rebar is expensive and ineffective against 7.0 earthquakes and to make an effective structure against 7.0 earthquakes, the design is much much more expensive. This would also probably prove to be ineffective due to corruption and low code standards. And that is with the assumption that we only helped Haiti and not the numerous other 3rd world countries that have a probably of natural disasters


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:39 PM.

Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.