I bet you got dressed in the basement after that.
|
I think it's funny that the Republicans are represented by pink. Not that I care, but because I know they do.
|
is the house control part of the graphic correct toward the later part of the axis?
|
looks wrong to me
|
2 Attachment(s)
Here are a couple interesting, if not frightening from yesterday's MJ show.
This link will take you to their page. I couldn't find the video of the segment on youtube. |
First graph ... defense, discretionary and other mandatory will flatline for 30 years? :eyebrow: :headshake
It is worth noting that the biggest consistent increase is in health care. In fact, if you spent less on that, it might cut back the social security obligations a bit too. :bolt: Second graph ... incomprehensible. What is the vertical axis? What was at zero in 2008? |
Go to the link ZG ...
The first graph - These are current projections as a % of GDP. The second graph is employment change from 2008. Based upon employment in 2008. Thats why its at 0. |
Quote:
Quote:
|
1 Attachment(s)
Government spending vs Unemployment
|
oops - from here admittedly biased source, but if the numbers are correct, it is an interesting trend.
|
It would be interesting to see those two parameters plotted against each other.
From the link: Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Well, rising unemployment can lead to government stimulus packages, which would explain the correlation in 2008-2010. Man, those lines got ugly there, didn't they?
|
1 Attachment(s)
|
Can't get the pics out, but a good look at a couple more.
I'm in this BIG EFFIN RED area with a few other dwellars. 27+ weeks 45.9% Gah! Wall Street Journal |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:21 AM. |
Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.