The Cellar

The Cellar (http://cellar.org/index.php)
-   Current Events (http://cellar.org/forumdisplay.php?f=4)
-   -   Weird News (http://cellar.org/showthread.php?t=16997)

Shawnee123 04-20-2010 07:24 AM

Yeah. When will the government start legislating food, for people who are addicted to food and weigh 5000 pounds...and cost society in much the same ways as alcohol addiction in terms of being a productive member of our society or being a drain on resources and not contributing.

I would rather a person get home from work and relax by smoking a hoo-haa than lay around all day eating potato chips, buckets of chicken, and McDons by the truckload.

So, where does it end? When do we put shame on those with food addictions the way we put shame on smokers or drinkers? It's not nice to make fun of fat people. It's hilarious to make fun of smokers. :cool:

SamIam 04-20-2010 09:51 AM

Hold that thought, Shawnee. The military now considers school lunches to be a matter for national security.

Quote:

WASHINGTON – School lunches have been called many things, but a group of retired military officers is giving them a new label: national security threat.

That's not a reference to the mystery meat served up in the cafeteria line either. The retired officers are saying that school lunches have helped make the nation's young people so fat that fewer of them can meet the military's physical fitness standards, and recruitment is in jeopardy.

A new report being released Tuesday says more than 9 million young adults, or 27 percent of all Americans ages 17 to 24, are too overweight to join the military. Now, the officers are advocating for passage of a wide-ranging nutrition bill that aims to make the nation's school lunches healthier.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20100420/...lunches_threat

Shawnee123 04-20-2010 09:55 AM

Ha! Yeah, we need 'em healthy so they can go get shot. Well, if anyone can influence the country, it's the military and the fear they inject into people whenever anything is a question of "national security."

:worried:

jinx 04-20-2010 12:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DanaC (Post 650142)

[eta] it always amazes me that the country that purports to want small government that keeps out of your personal life, also wants that government to regulate what you put into your mouths and veins. It doesn't get more personal than that. It is not the state's job to decide what I eat, smoke or inject.

Yes, as you're such a raging libertarian I can see why this would wind you up. It's just the state's job to feed, clothe, house, medicate, and educate you - otherwise they need to butt the hell out of your life, man!
You sound like a teenager.

Shawnee123 04-20-2010 12:54 PM

Wait a gawdam minute. Teh gubmint should be feeding and clothing and housing me?

THAT's what the fuck I've been doing wrong all this time. Those people always seem to be sitting pretty: no worries about gas costs or car payments or rent or the rising cost of groceries.

*runs to quit job and apply for gubmint assistance and to eat until I qualify for fatass pay*

:lol:

It's funny because it's fucking true.

disclaimer: not about any of you, just my disgruntled and disgusted opinion from someone who's worked their ass off their whole lives and never seems to get out from under it.

Now, smoke 'em if you got 'em. Cause, fuck it. :joint:

classicman 04-20-2010 12:55 PM

don't forget vacationing jinx

Clodfobble 04-20-2010 01:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Shawnee123
Well, if anyone can influence the country, it's the military and the fear they inject into people whenever anything is a question of "national security."

Hell yeah. If there's one thing the military knows how to do, it's get things done. Maybe not in the most efficient or elegant way, but it gets done. If it takes the military to teach parents that french fries are not a goddamn vegetable, then so be it.

Shawnee123 04-20-2010 01:41 PM

:lol: @ Clod.

squirell nutkin 04-20-2010 03:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ZenGum (Post 650200)
Can anyone tell me a good reason why recreational drugs should be treated differently?

I think it was Terrence McKenna's book, "Food of the Gods" where he makes the argument that the only drugs that are sanctioned by society, are what he calls "industrial drugs." That is, drugs that make you a good industrial worker.
Caffeine to get you going in the morning and keep you going all day,Nicotine to keep your mind sharp, Then booze to take the edge off the caffeine and help you forget what a miserable shitty job you are enslaved to, sleeping pills to help you sleep so you are ready to get up and go again and even regular speed is tolerated as diet pills or to help you stay awake. The penalties for speed are lighter than for narcotics.

He posits that narcotics and psychedlics are not tolerated because they do not enhance your value as an industrial worker. Psychedelics especially since they encourage questioning of the status quo.

Gravdigr 04-20-2010 03:36 PM

Oh, for God's sake, let's not question anything...

lumberjim 04-20-2010 05:01 PM

question *these*

Gravdigr 04-20-2010 05:20 PM

They miss you.

DanaC 04-20-2010 05:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jinx (Post 650294)
Yes, as you're such a raging libertarian I can see why this would wind you up. It's just the state's job to feed, clothe, house, medicate, and educate you - otherwise they need to butt the hell out of your life, man!
You sound like a teenager.

Ok. I see we've stepped away from pleasant and into downright insulting.


My point still stands: a country that favours small government that has no responsibility to ensure health care for all, and considers such a thing an abuse of of its role at the same time has some of the most illiberal drugs laws (not in all states I know) in the western world. I see that as conflicting.

TheMercenary 04-20-2010 06:04 PM

SO basically

Welfare State = Good

Personal Responsiblity = Bad.

Correct?

DanaC 04-20-2010 06:13 PM

No. That's not what I believe in.

Welfare state = necessary
Personal responsibility = also necessary.

I don't see thse as mutually exclusive.

I have a personal responsibility and I also share in a societal responsibility.

TheMercenary 04-20-2010 06:26 PM

I don't want you to think this a total dig on you, more so what the attitude is (not that I need to tell you this). But somewhere there is a grey area. For some that is the width of a street, for others the width of the Channel. In that area lays both personal responsibility and Government responsibility. IMHO, in this country we have fostered and developed generations of people dependent on public assistance. We are seeing a resurgence with the latest roles of unemployment. People have just given up. Obama will save them. It is a false notion.

DanaC 04-20-2010 06:30 PM

i agree, there is definately a grey area. There's a point at which assistance ceases to be paliative and begins to form the central foundation of someone's life. At that point it is clear something has gone badly wrong.

Where i suspect we differ is in our response to that grey area.

jinx 04-20-2010 06:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DanaC (Post 650414)
Ok. I see we've stepped away from pleasant and into downright insulting.

We? Speak for yourself.
I'm trying to have a conversation about whether it makes sense to legalize opiates and you start shouting about the evils of my government, as if I'm in charge. Get over yourself and try to follow the plot.

DanaC 04-20-2010 06:44 PM

fair enough. Ignore anything I say at the moment. I'm really not myself.



i just had a stand up row with someone on the BF forum about girls and gaming. *shrugs* I am a heartbeat away from rage or tears at any given moment. I tried to explain that last night, but I probably didn;t do it very well :P

jinx 04-20-2010 06:47 PM

Does BF = Breast Feeding? Because that would explain everything...

DanaC 04-20-2010 06:48 PM

lol
no BF = Big Finish

squirell nutkin 04-20-2010 08:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jinx (Post 650439)
Does BF = Breast Feeding? Because that would explain everything...

The nursing mom defense. I'm still hearing it nearly two years after weaning...;)

HungLikeJesus 04-20-2010 08:53 PM

I'm glad to hear that you've been weaned, squirell. I bet you've got sharp teeth.

Bruce 9012 04-20-2010 09:06 PM

I would like to start a thread. The site says I'm enabled I know I'm looking in the wrong area,.Need some help .....the thread will be about....

Clodfobble 04-20-2010 09:30 PM

Bruce, go back to main page, pick a forum (Home Base, Nothingland, etc.) and then click the "New Thread" button towards the top left of the page.

Bruce 9012 04-20-2010 09:49 PM

Thanks Clodfobble, I will try to make the thread interesting, also funny.

squirell nutkin 04-20-2010 11:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bruce 9012 (Post 650472)
Thanks Clodfobble, I will try to make the thread interesting, also funny.

It doesn't get much better than that around here. Well, boobs are good too.

xoxoxoBruce 04-20-2010 11:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheMercenary (Post 650428)
IMHO, in this country we have fostered and developed generations of people dependent on public assistance. We are seeing a resurgence with the latest roles of unemployment. People have just given up. Obama will save them. It is a false notion.

One has nothing to do with the other. The welfare crowd isn't worried about becoming unemployed, they already are. The millions of people who've been throw out of work are depending on unemployment insurance, as we always have. That doesn't mean they are not looking for work. Yes, they are looking to our President, because they know they probably won't find work until the economy picks up. That's what they hear from employers and the media, and our President seems to be the only one that's trying to do anything about it.

Shawnee123 04-21-2010 09:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by xoxoxoBruce (Post 650509)
One has nothing to do with the other. The welfare crowd isn't worried about becoming unemployed, they already are. The millions of people who've been throw out of work are depending on unemployment insurance, as we always have. That doesn't mean they are not looking for work. Yes, they are looking to our President, because they know they probably won't find work until the economy picks up. That's what they hear from employers and the media, and our President seems to be the only one that's trying to do anything about it.

Bravo.

Yeah, our societal responsibility (as Dana so eloquently put it) is nothing new. It's not as if Obama came into office and everyone voluntarily quit working and went on unemployment, amid shouts of "YAY, we can loll about now! Woo hooo! I LOVES some struggles."

Shawnee123 04-21-2010 03:50 PM

Oh, well...my brother told me about the episode. Would've thought the bear suit would make it OK.

Nooooooooooooo, it's not a THREAT, per se.

http://www.nytimes.com/reuters/2010/...k-muslims.html

Shawnee123 04-26-2010 08:18 AM

Dust storm in Arizona closes Arizona highway.

Meanwhile, millions of illegal immigrants flooded the state, and illegals currently in the state walked about freely. After all, it's hard to see skin color in a dust storm. :neutral:

classicman 04-26-2010 12:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Shawnee123 (Post 651587)
illegals currently in the state walked about freely.

How is that any different than any other day in AZ. :yelsick:

Shawnee123 04-26-2010 12:20 PM

Haven't you heard? There's a new law. They can gun you down from suspicion that you are in the country illegally.

Don't play "huh?" Please. We both know better.

Sheldonrs 04-26-2010 12:27 PM

It's gotten to the point where I'm actually embarrassed to live in AZ.
First the OK to carry unlicensed concealed weapons, now the Mexican hunt and soon the birther law that will require any presidential candidate to present their birth certificate to AZ before they can go on the ballot.
Not to mention the fact that the choice for our next senate race comes down to McCain or Hayworth. It's like choosing which TYPE of cancer you would prefer.

Spexxvet 04-26-2010 12:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sheldonrs (Post 651636)
... It's like choosing which TYPE of cancer you would prefer.

republican cancer. :sweat:

classicman 04-26-2010 12:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Shawnee123 (Post 651634)
Haven't you heard? There's a new law. They can gun you down from suspicion that you are in the country illegally.

BULLSHIT!
Quote:

We both know better.
Apparently not.

Shawnee123 04-26-2010 01:10 PM

Hey, you know what? I've given up on reasonable discourse with you, I did so a long time ago.

So really, I'm not in the mood for your divisive crap.

You came into my headlights thread, just as I knew you would, I predicted the fucking shit though I guess I didn't post it, just to say "WHAT???" to tw for no reason. Or, to put it more plainly, you wouldn't have been like that if it had been someone else who had said something you didn't understand.

Like you didn't know my comment was tongue-in-cheek. Go fuck with someone else, I am NOT in the mood for your shit.

classicman 04-26-2010 02:33 PM

Please. I can't believe I'm even gonna lower myself & respond to this.
Your boy made yet another bullshit claim that was basically crap - I as well as other people called him on it, one even said it was "bullshit" Did you get into it with the other posters? Don't bother to answer - that was a rhetorical question.

I know you got shit going on, but really...

ETA - and no, I didn't realize your post in THIS THREAD (which was very similar to what you said in two other threads) was tongue-in-cheek.

spudcon 04-26-2010 07:20 PM

I thought it was open season on ranch owners in Arizona.

Cicero 04-26-2010 07:47 PM

Classic and Shaw...Shake hands and walk away. :) K?

Or you both will be on report. :)

TheMercenary 04-27-2010 10:43 AM

:)

Toilet Paper Bandit Sought

http://www.thesmokinggun.com/archive...427101tp1.html

lumberjim 04-27-2010 11:38 AM

oh shit: ( from the link in merc's post )

Quote:

Second Craigslist "Group Sex" Bust

Cops: Connecticut man placed phony ad to torment female neighbor

APRIL 22--Meet Philip Conran. In a bid to torment a female neighbor with whom he was fighting, the Connecticut man allegedly placed a phony Craigslist ad directing men seeking "group sex" to the woman's home, police charge. Conran, a 42-year-old chef, today made his initial court appearance in connection with reckless endangerment and harassment counts filed as a result of the fake April 5 online classified. Investigators tied Conran to the Craigslist "casual encounters" posting--which was purportedly placed by a "West Hartford soccer mom" and headlined "looking for lust"--through an analysis of records obtained from Craigslist and AT&T Internet Services, according to an arrest affidavit. When cops tracked an IP address to Conran's home, he confessed to posting the "party sex" ad directing men to next-door neighbor Terry Sharp's Dartmouth Avenue home. Conran, free on $75,000 bond, is the second person to be arrested as a result of the Craigslist posting. Richard Zeh, one of about a dozen men who showed up to answer the ad, was charged with burglary, sexual assault, and trespassing after he groped and made obscene comments to a 18-year-old woman. Zeh, a 29-year-old personal trainer, accosted the woman after mistakenly going to the wrong West Hartford address. Zeh told police that he was "bored" when he decided to answer the Craigslist ad. He acknowledged that the button on his shorts had "fallen off" and that his "pubic hair and his erect penis could have been sticking out of his pants" when he walked into the teenager's residence. (6 pages)

classicman 04-27-2010 12:51 PM

Quote:

He acknowledged that the button on his shorts had "fallen off" and that his "pubic hair and his erect penis could have been sticking out of his pants" when he walked into the teenager's residence.
HAHAHAHAHAHAHA what an ass!

Sheldonrs 04-27-2010 04:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by classicman (Post 652039)
HAHAHAHAHAHAHA what an ass!

It doesn't mention that THAT was showing.

Cicero 04-27-2010 05:38 PM

LOL! What a way to traumatize your neighbor.....Sounds like it turned into quite the side-show circus.... :)

xoxoxoBruce 04-30-2010 07:02 PM

They took away a toddler's cheese sandwich.:rolleyes:
Quote:

Yet the impossible has happened: staff at a nursery in Pemberton, near Wigan, have confiscated a cheese sandwich belonging to a two-year-old pupil, Jack Ormisher. Its failing was to contain neither lettuce nor tomato.

Wigan Council has since confirmed that the straight-up combination of cheese and bread contravenes its healthy eating guidelines — and fully supported the cheese-snatchers. “The centre has a list of recommended healthy food, according to national guidelines, which children are encouraged to eat,” said a spokesman. “A cheese sandwich would not feature on the list.”
Fucking unbelievable.

jinx 04-30-2010 07:05 PM

Well duh, needs mustard, clearly.

squirell nutkin 04-30-2010 09:51 PM

So fucking wrong where do we start?

Clodfobble 04-30-2010 10:01 PM

Meh. It's a private organization, with food rules that were known by the child's mother beforehand. Tons of preschools would confiscate a peanut butter sandwich these days. Or there are other private preschools that don't allow commercial characters on the premises (like Mickey Mouse on t-shirts.) And there was that big brouhaha awhile back, about a Catholic school that kicked out a student because her mother was a stripper and refused to take a different job. Private organizations get to make their own rules, and if you don't like it, you can pick a different one.

squirell nutkin 04-30-2010 10:12 PM

I guess actually reading the link makes for a more informed opinion. I'll have to agree with you in that case.

I'm frequently telling the malcontents at the coop: Don't like the way things run? Join the board or start your own coop.

(But the irony of it all --England making rules about food?)

xoxoxoBruce 04-30-2010 11:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Clodfobble (Post 652849)
Meh. It's a private organization, with food rules that were known by the child's mother beforehand.

Where do you get private organization from? If so, why is the Wigan council involved?
I still think they could have handled the situation better than snatching a 2 year olds sandwich away from him, take it up with his mother for christ's sake.

Cicero 05-01-2010 01:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jinx (Post 652816)
Well duh, needs mustard, clearly.

:sweat:

I am dying to know what they replaced the confiscated sandwich with...One of those things I guess I will just never know.....

I am so glad cheese sandwiches are of highest priority for the Wigan Council.....:facepalm: This has to be stopped. It's an outrage!!

Sundae 05-01-2010 05:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by xoxoxoBruce (Post 652814)
Fucking unbelievable.

Fucking untrue...?
Quote:

But nursery manager Aukje Clegg said: “This is absolutely untrue. That is all I can say. I know what happened. The mother knows what happened. If she wants to make this out of it, that’s her problem but it’s not the truth.”

Asked if children were allowed to eat cheese sandwiches, she said: “Of course they are.”

Clodfobble 05-01-2010 07:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by xoxoxoBruce
Where do you get private organization from? If so, why is the Wigan council involved?

Went back to the article to find the details that had given me that impression (I know I had thought that the "Wigan Council" was the preschool's board, not an elected council, but that definitely could have been wrong,) but the article's been taken down now.

monster 05-01-2010 08:08 AM

cheese sandwich is the punishment lunch in school here if you haven't paid your lunch bill....

the article linked to is sensationalist BS though, written for the rise, not necessarily in the interest of reporting the truth.

Besides, given the location and it's proximity to Liverpool, they nursery staff are probably just trying to cover up that some scouser stole the kids sandwich while they were on a fag break.

:p:

classicman 05-01-2010 08:58 AM

Quote:

Earlier this month a school in Atlanta, Georgia, penalised pupils who had indulged in a food fight by serving a “cheese sandwich only” menu for several consecutive days. Sounds like heaven to us.

Clodfobble 05-01-2010 09:21 AM

Don't forget, this would be school cafeteria "bread" and "cheese," not some fragrant emmantaler melted delicately atop a toasted baguette. School food is the same processed stuff they feed to prisoners.

jinx 05-01-2010 10:51 AM

mmmmmm... subsidized....

xoxoxoBruce 05-01-2010 11:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Clodfobble (Post 652893)
... but the article's been taken down now.

Strange, I got a 404 from my link, in IE7. But when I copied the link in Firefox, it connected ok. Then I tried in IE7 again, and it connected. The reason I tried that was, I had saved a link to the Cardboard Dad in another Brit paper, and when I tried to post last night the same thing happened.:rollanim:

jinx 05-02-2010 10:23 AM

Local, not weird, sorry.... didn't want to start a whole thread though.

Jimmy Johns burned down.


Quote:

CHADDS FORD — Fire ripped through Jimmy John’s Eatery about 8:19 a.m. Saturday following a propane-tank explosion in the kitchen grill area.

Restaurant employee Scott Gilmour described the fire as a tragedy. The historic eatery was to celebrate its 70th anniversary Saturday.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:14 AM.

Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.