| sexobon |
11-17-2011 08:16 PM |
HB UT, here's something to think about as you're getting older ...
We have the theory of gravity to explain the relationships between large things like planets and galaxies in the universe. We have the theories of electromagnetism (effects attraction), the strong force (holds atoms together), and the weak force (accounts for radioactive decay), which when applied together explain the relationships between small things like atoms, electrons-neutrons-protons, and quarks. We also have string theory, vibrating or wiggling strands of energy as the basic components of all things matter and energy, that provides for multiple universes and is supposed to be a "unifying theory" or "theory of everything"; but, is it really? That theory addresses only the science, not the science and philosophy of everything. Mankind does not live by science alone. There's further need for a theory that unifies science and philosophy, a theory of one which in layman's terms might be called a god theory. The science would be proven through experimentation and the philosophy narrowed down through the process of elimination to one inescapable brilliant deduction. So, by taking the established scientific theories to their culmination in string theory and asking ourselves what kind of god would account for all of creation being made up of wiggling strings, the logical conclusion is that god is a cat [cats ARE fickle]. The Egyptians were right!
|
