The Cellar

The Cellar (http://cellar.org/index.php)
-   Politics (http://cellar.org/forumdisplay.php?f=5)
-   -   Al Franken...is this for real? (http://cellar.org/showthread.php?t=15324)

zippyt 09-07-2007 08:53 PM

he is the Prince Mongo of the election .

Urbane Guerrilla 09-08-2007 04:46 AM

High negatives, though -- he's the sort of guy the voters love to vote against. This will sink him without trace.

TheMercenary 09-13-2007 11:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Flint (Post 383065)
AL FRANKEN FOR U.S. SENATE
Is this already being discussed somewhere on the Cellar? If not, why not?

Now that if funny as hell. He is a joke. Now he wants to join the longest running comedy show ever. :D

Shawnee123 09-13-2007 11:28 AM

He'll never make it. His IQ is too high to be president (precedent set by president.)

Flint 09-13-2007 11:29 AM

Quote:

Now he wants to join the longest running comedy show ever.
The Onion is running a story right now: "Clinton Blasts Obama for Slamming Edwards Jab" . . . ha ha ha

Urbane Guerrilla 09-14-2007 07:52 AM

Shawnee, check Woodrow Wilson's IQ if you're looking for a Presidential precedent.

It is folly to assume that party affiliation either reflects or affects intelligence.

Shawnee123 09-14-2007 07:54 AM

I was assuming neither. He's a pretty smart guy. The current president is a not so smart guy. Party irrelevant. Pretty simple.

But I do like me some folly. ;)

Flint 12-19-2008 09:44 AM

Yeah, I guess this was for real. Some sources have theis race as close as two votes.

barefoot serpent 12-19-2008 10:07 AM

and here they are

plus the 'lizard people' ballot

classicman 12-19-2008 01:18 PM

Those are great - thanks BS

glatt 12-19-2008 01:41 PM

Yeah, they actually were very interesting ballots to see. For several of them, you can't get a sense of what the voter intended until you view the pdf of the entire ballot and see the logic the voter was using. Then the craziness actually makes some sense and you can see what the voter wanted. But in an antagonistic system like an election and later a lawsuit, you can see why even when the voter intent is clear, someone is going to dispute a ballot because the rules weren't followed.

lookout123 12-19-2008 02:00 PM

Very interesting. stupid, but interesting. if they are supposed to clearly and cleanly fill in the circle or ask for a new ballot in case of a mistake and they could do neither properly, the ballot shouldn't be counted.

glatt 12-19-2008 02:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by lookout123 (Post 515212)
Very interesting. stupid, but interesting. if they are supposed to clearly and cleanly fill in the circle or ask for a new ballot in case of a mistake and they could do neither properly, the ballot shouldn't be counted.

Except the Minnesota guidelines for counting votes say that if you can tell the intent of the voter, the neatness of the ballot doesn't matter.

lookout123 12-19-2008 02:13 PM

I know that's what it says and that's what they're trying to do. I'm just saying the law should be changed. If you're too stupid to scribble in a circle and barring that, ask for another ballot, you don't deserve to have your vote counted.

glatt 12-19-2008 02:19 PM

I can't argue with that.

Actually, that's not true. I could argue with that, but my heart wouldn't be in it.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:38 PM.

Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.