The Cellar

The Cellar (http://cellar.org/index.php)
-   Technology (http://cellar.org/forumdisplay.php?f=7)
-   -   Ditching Cable Television (http://cellar.org/showthread.php?t=23600)

Rhianne 09-24-2010 10:41 AM

No TW, that's not what I meant at all. I was referring to the range of frequencies that the digital signal is transmitted on, not the width of the channel. Should I get all technical? I have no working knowledge of the system changes in the US so perhaps I should have refrained from posting here.

I'm not a salesman.

classicman 09-24-2010 11:43 AM

Hi Rhianne - just make sure there are no WMD's in your antenna and you should be fine.

tw 09-24-2010 11:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rhianne (Post 684693)
I was referring to the range of frequencies that the digital signal is transmitted on, not the width of the channel. Should I get all technical?

Yes. Making statements without the always required reasons why and numbers means the statement is probably hearsay. And that was why I was shocked when so many knew Saddam had WMDs. They *knew* without first learning 'always required' technical reasons why and the numbers.

The old analog system had channels 2 through 82. With digital, all frequencies above channel 69 were removed. Later channels 53 through 69 were removed.

Remember a recent FCC auction for the 700 Mhz band to cell phones and for a national safety system band? Newspaper reporters mostly had so much contempt for facts as to not report where that spectrum was coming from. That was channels 53 through 69 being removed from commercial TV use.

Digital stations operate on the same bandwidth per channel. Number of TV channels (frequencies) have been reduced from 81 to 51 channels.

Always first learn the numbers. Always have the technicals.

There is no digital antenna. The antennas no longer have to coveer the 700 Mhz and 800 Hhz frequency bands. Most digital stations are broadcasting in the 500 and 600 Mhz band.

Some stations (ie Philadelphia's Channel 6) stupidly stayed on their original frequency - 83 Mhz. So an antenna designed for 500 and 600 Mhz (most all other stations) must also include another design for 83 Mhz. So many had problems getting Channel 6 when the transistion finished.

Rhianne 09-24-2010 02:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rhianne (Post 684693)
I have no working knowledge of the system changes in the US so perhaps I should have refrained from posting here.


Clodfobble 09-24-2010 04:57 PM

Don't let tw bum you out, Rhianne. He's just tw.

skysidhe 09-24-2010 05:01 PM

No, you should post here Rhianne. I like reading peoples posts.
Take TW with a grain of salt.

xoxoxoBruce 09-24-2010 05:03 PM

Or without the salt. ;)

skysidhe 09-24-2010 05:25 PM

Or Mrs. Dash :)

xoxoxoBruce 09-24-2010 05:31 PM

1 Attachment(s)
.

skysidhe 09-24-2010 05:34 PM

I like to do Mrs. Dash this way,,,,,:bolt:

tw 09-24-2010 07:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Clodfobble (Post 684771)
Don't let tw bum you out, Rhianne. He's just tw.

And god damn, motherfucking, piss ass, honest. That means numbers.

There is no digital antenna. Salesman who sold a 'digital antenna' deserves to be hung from his balls. But we let bin Laden and pedophile priests go free. And did nothing. That's the softer side of tw.

tw 09-24-2010 07:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rhianne (Post 684693)
I have no working knowledge of the system changes in the US so perhaps I should have refrained from posting here.

And, as noted earlier, the US uses a standard different from the rest of the world because a 1997 US Congress wanted to protect Zenith. Welfare to corporations resulted in a system not as robust as what exists elsewhere.

classicman 09-24-2010 10:27 PM

Put down the bottle, log off and go to bed.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:24 PM.

Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.