How do you know?

We don't know.. maybe the dinosaurs were sentient?

Maybe Atlantis was real?

Maybe there was a civilization so powerful that it brought us here, having fled from a distant Armageddon and crash landed, bred out the indigenous ape men (missing link, cave drawings of astronauts, etc) and forgot itself.

They are coming back to get me. Dec 24th.

I doubt any of you are in on it, but if you are I'll see you there.

Oh come on, UT! Now you're just being disingenuous. You can't compare poor people in a wealthy country like the US with people in the third world suffering from famine.

Would you call these African famine victims "obese"? You're comparing apples and oranges. :eyebrow:

PH, let's call it a decimation of human existence: a reduction by a tenth.

Those children existed during the Malthusian predictions and continue to exist now that the predictions are generally considered wrong.

That's oh for infinity+1, play again?

If I've told you once, I've told you an infinite number of times: don't exagerate!

You bet!

Just because you don't see such suffering and deaths from lack of food or severe malnutrition happening in Philly doesn't mean there isn't any problem.

We're talking about your outdated and generally considered wrong notion of ecological fairy tales about the world being unable to produce enough food

We're not talking about the inability of Africa to govern itself to the point where it can apply the basic agricultural technologies that improve such production.

Oh? Someone has figured out how African nations can govern themselves out of drought? (Drought being a major factor in the most recent famine in Somalia). :rolleyes:

Never mind.

Sam, check over the theory that in Africa famines only occur through some human intervention, perhaps well intentioned but as often malicious, and would not occur absent these interventions. There are those students of famines who figure this is why there are famines in the first place. Once a drought happens. The problem really springs from resource misallocations (viz. & e.g., corruption, thievery and so forth) during times of relative plenty in these pocket-handkerchief economies.

The United States, for an example of clearly doing something differently, has droughts and crop failures all the time. Localized. You don't see American skeletons shuffling down the Interstates as refugees trying to get away. You've never seen it in American history, period. Might have something to do with doing capitalism and free markets and other much-abused notions.

Do you mean to say that The United States had a decade of crippling poverty, breadlines, homelessness, chronic unemployment, malnutrition, mass migration of families, shanty-towns and a large percentage of people did not starve to death during the great depression? A quick note about how the U.S. handled the resource allocation during this time of great suffering. In September of 1934 over 6 million young pigs were slaughtered to stabilize prices, with most of the meat going to waste. Capitalism and free markets at it's finest for sure.

I love the U.S. and think it is important that we are honest about our past. Capitalism and free markets are definite components of a free society. But, if profit margin is the only moral compass then tragedies like the slaughter of 6 million pigs and wasting the meat during this countries worst drought will happen, and of course it's their own fault because this disaster was caused by human intervention and deserves no efforts on our part intervene.

Now, the native populations of the Continental U.S. estimated at between 5 and 10 million people in the 1500's was reduced to apprx. 250,000 in the territory of the United States at the end of the 19th century. Most died of disease and famine. But, they weren't Americans and probably don't count. They have a different history then American history.

Another truly remarkable statement that I don't think you want to hang your hat on... !

Try Google Images for just one word: "Okies"

Who knows, if you were born in Calif, Oregon, Washington, Idaho, etc.
these working people (farmers, etc) might be your ancestors just 3 generations back.
.

Over 12 million Americans died of starvation during the dust bowl/ Great Depression. As others here have stated, your understanding of American History (among other things) leaves something to be desired.

Also, you are misrepresenting what I posted. I never said that famines occur because of "human intervention". I believe that was UT's thesis, not mine.

Certainly, famine in Africa is a complex subject with many over-lapping factors. Human over population and climate change are important triggers to famine. And you really can't compare the US to Africa in that regard. The population density in Africa is much greater than it is here for one thing.

Unlike the US population, the population of Africa still tends to make a living from farming (or tries to). African farms tend to be extremely small and over-grazed, as well as over farmed. Too many grazing animals strip large areas of land of its vegetation, making it susceptible to wind erosion and flooding. The nutrients that each crop takes from the soil are not replaced due to lack of fertilizers and the inability to allow fields to lie fallow once a harvest has come in. I could write a book on this, but there are already ones out there far better written than anything I might attempt. Jared Diamond's "Collapse" is an excellent introduction to the subject.

Frankly, I am amazed that both you and UT are both touting the intervention of government. Roosevelt helped rise the US out of the Great Depression by increasing taxes on the wealthy, creating far reaching new social programs - like social security, and instituting the great public works projects of the time like the Hoover Dam.

In our current political atmosphere, Conservatives would rather roast in hell for eternity before raising taxes on the wealthy by so much as a penny. The Right wants to curtail or end as many social programs as possible and actually advocate leaving the less fortunate to die from hunger on the streets of our cities.

Far from rescuing us from any potential environmental disaster, conservatives would call upon social Darwinism to take care of the problem. Admit it guys. You can't have it both ways.

But in the end it was World War II that tipped the balance in lifting America out of depression.
No disrespect to FDR - he is one of my politcal heroes.

How come wars used to help the economy and now they hurt it?