![]() |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
oh apparently, whilst phileeeeep is a prince consort, he is not titled as such. so clear. Thank goodness for Wikipedia, source of everything correct... ;)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prince_consort ....but it does seem to be because a king would outrank the queen which is obviously undesirable when the bloke in question is a mere consort. I wonder if this still stands, now the males-over-females element has been removed from the line of succession? |
Monster is pretty much correct as far as the UK is concerned at least. It would take an act of parliament for a male consort to take the title 'King'. Victoria tried to make Albert a King but the commoners wouldn't allow it (because he was a dirty foreigner) and he, like Phil the Greek, had to make do with just being a Prince.
But these people love titles, they make half them up as they go along, but I don't mind, I'm sure it makes them feel relevant. |
From my link, which is by no means the final word, it's been a while since the last King Consort:
Quote:
|
The Scottish have always done things differently:P
Their property laws are frikkin baffling |
Quote:
|
Consort sounds saucier.
|
Toad Consomme sounds saucier.
|
Toad pregnant sounds weirder
|
Quote:
\allaboutme |
:jig:
|
#notallfeetfeetfeet
|
OMGOMGOMGOMG O. M. G.
Meghan Markle left the tag on her dress:eek::eek::eek::eek: ALERT THE MEDIA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:11 PM. |
Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.